Validation of bioelectrical impedance analysis to hydrostatic weighing in male body builders
- 713 Downloads
The purpose of this study was to compare bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) to hydrostatic weighing (HW) in male weight lifters and body builders. Twenty-two male body builders and weight lifters, 23 ± 3 years of age (mean ± SD), were studied to determine the efficacy of BIA to HW in this population. Subjects were measured on two separate occasions, 6 weeks apart, for test–retest reliability purposes. Participants recorded 3-day dietary intakes and average work-out times and regimens between the two testing periods. Subjects were, on average, 75 ± 8 kg of body weight and 175 ± 7 cm tall. Validation results were as follows: constant error for HW–BIA = 0.128 ± 3.7%, r for HW versus BIA = −0.294. Standard error of the estimate for BIA = 2.32% and the total error for BIA = 3.6%. Percent body fat was 7.8 ± 1% from BIA and 8.5 ± 2% from HW (P > 0.05). Subjects consumed 3,217 ± 1,027 kcals; 1,848 ± 768 kcals from carbohydrates; 604 ± 300 kcals from protein; and 783 ± 369 kcals from fat. Although work-outs differed among one another, within subject training did not vary. These results suggest that measurement of percent body fat in male body builders and weight trainers is equally as accurate using BIA or HW.
KeywordsBioelectrical impedance analysis Body composition Hydrostatic weighing Weight training
The authors would like to thank all of the subjects who participated in the study and Mary Jane Laus, M.S. and Heather Fantini, B.S. for their assistance with analyses of the diet records. This grant was supported by the University of Massachusetts, Amherst, Healey Endowment Grant.
- 4.Beshyah SA, Freemantle C, Thomas E, Page B, Murphy M, Johnston DG (1995) Comparison of measurements of body composition by total body potassium, bioimpedance analysis, and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in hypopituitary adults before and after growth hormone treatment. Am J Clin Nutr 61(6):1186–1194PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 9.Forbes GB (1987) Techniques for estimating body composition. In: Forbes GB (ed) Human body composition. Springer, New York, pp 5–100Google Scholar
- 12.Guo S, Roche AF, Houtkooper L (1989) Fat-free mass in children and young adults predicted from bioelectric impedance and anthropometric variables. Am J Clin Nutr 50:433–443Google Scholar
- 18.McArdle WD, Katch FI, Katch VI (1991) Exercise physiology: energy, nutrition, and human performance, 3rd edn. Lea and Febiger, Philadelphia, pp 599–633Google Scholar
- 19.Pace N, Rathbun EN (1945) Studies on body composition III. The body water and chemically combined nitrogen content in relation to fat content. J Biol Chem 158:685–691Google Scholar
- 21.Roberts SB, Coward WA, Schilingenseipen K-H, Nohria V, Lucas A (1986) Comparison of doubly labeled water (2H218O) method with indirect calorimetry and a nutrient- balance study for simultaneous determination of energy expenditure, water intake, and metabolizable energy in preterm infants. Am J Clin Nutr 44:315–322PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 24.Siri WE (1956) Gross composition of the body. In: Lawrence JH, Tobias CA (eds) Advances in biological and medical physics, vol 4. Academic, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- 26.van Raaj JMA, Peek MEM, Vermat-Miedema SH, Schonk CM, Hautvast JG (1988) New equations for estimating body fat mass in pregnancy from body density or total body water. Am J Clin Nutr 48:24–29Google Scholar
- 28.Wilmore JH (1969) The use of actual, predicted and constant residual volumes in the assessment of body composition by underwater weighing. Med Sci Sports 2:87–90Google Scholar