This prospective study aimed to clarify whether this novel device can evaluate the cup orientation during total hip arthroplasty (THA) more closely to that measured in postoperative computed tomography (CT) compared to the surgeon’s estimate using a manual goniometer.
We prospectively performed 30 cementless THAs via the anterolateral approach in supine position between October 2018 and July 2019, wherein cup orientation was evaluated by both a portable imageless navigation system (HipAlign) and a manual goniometer during surgeries. Primary outcome was the absolute estimate error [the absolute value of the difference between cup angles measured by postoperative CT and those measured by HipAlign (group H) or surgeon’s estimate using the manual goniometer (group S) during surgery]. The number of outliers of the absolute estimate error (> 10°) in each group was also estimated.
The absolute estimate error of cup inclination in groups H and S was 3.3° ± 2.7° and 3.0° ± 2.5°, respectively (p = 0.51), whereas that of cup anteversion was 3.8° ± 3.4° and 6.0° ± 3.7°, respectively (p = 0.0008). The number of outliers of the estimate error in groups H and S was one case (3.3%) and six cases (20.0%), respectively (p = 0.04). In all six outlier cases, surgeons underestimated cup anteversion during surgeries.
This portable imageless navigation system was a useful method, especially for avoiding incorrect cup anteversion. Underestimation of cup anteversion during THA in the supine position with the conventional alignment assisting device should be given attention.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Buy single article
Instant unlimited access to the full article PDF.
Price includes VAT for USA
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
This is the net price. Taxes to be calculated in checkout.
Callanan MC, Jarrett B, Bragdon CR et al (2011) The John Charnley Award: risk factors for cup malpositioning: quality improvement through a joint registry at a tertiary hospital. Clin Orthop Relat Res 469:319–329. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-010-1487-1
Malik A, Maheshwari A, Dorr LD (2007) Impingement with total hip replacement. J Bone Jt Surg Am 89:1832–1842. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.F.01313
Kummer FJ, Shah S, Iyer S et al (1999) The effect of acetabular cup orientations on limiting hip rotation. J Arthroplasty 14:509–513. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0883-5403(99)90110-9
Widmer KH, Zurfluh B (2004) Compliant positioning of total hip components for optimal range of motion. J Orthop Res 22:815–821. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orthres.2003.11.001
Reina N, Putman S, Desmarchelier R et al (2017) Can a target zone safer than Lewinnek’s safe zone be defined to prevent instability of total hip arthroplasties? Case-control study of 56 dislocated THA and 93 matched controls. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 103:657–661. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otsr.2017.05.015
Dorr LD, Malik A, Dastane M et al (2009) Combined anteversion technique for total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 467:119–127. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-008-0598-4
Sugano N, Nishii T, Miki H et al (2007) Mid-term results of cementless total hip replacement using a ceramic-on-ceramic bearing with and without computer navigation. J Bone Jt Surg Br 89:455–460. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.89B4.18458
Ogawa H, Hasegawa S, Tsukada S et al (2018) A pilot study of augmented reality technology applied to the acetabular cup placement during total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 33:1833–1837. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2018.01.067
Verdier N, Billaud A, Masquefa T et al (2016) EOS-based cup navigation: randomised controlled trial in 78 total hip arthroplasties. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 102:417–421. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otsr.2016.02.006
Aoude AA, Aldebeyan SA, Nooh A et al (2016) Thirty-day complications of conventional and computer-assisted total knee and total hip arthroplasty: analysis of 103,855 patients in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database. J Arthroplasty 31:1674–1679. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2016.01.042
Kalteis T, Handel M, Bäthis H et al (2006) Imageless navigation for insertion of the acetabular component in total hip arthroplasty: is it as accurate as CT-based navigation? J Bone Jt Surg Br 88:163–167. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.88B2.17163
Lass R, Kubista B, Olischar B et al (2014) Total hip arthroplasty using imageless computer-assisted hip navigation: a prospective randomized study. J Arthroplasty 29:786–791. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2013.08.020
Kamenaga T, Hayashi S, Hashimoto S et al (2019) Accuracy of cup orientation and learning curve of the accelerometer-based portable navigation system for total hip arthroplasty in the supine position. J Orthop Surg 27:2309499019848871. https://doi.org/10.1177/2309499019848871
Bertin KC, Röttinger H (2004) Anterolateral mini-incision hip replacement surgery: a modified Watson–Jones approach. Clin Orthop Relat Res 429:248–255. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.blo.0000150294.81825.8c
Takada R, Jinno T, Miyatake K et al (2018) Direct anterior versus anterolateral approach in one-stage supine total hip arthroplasty. Focused on nerve injury: a prospective, randomized, controlled trial. J Orthop Sci 23:783–787. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jos.2018.05.005
Murray DW (1993) The definition and measurement of acetabular orientation. J Bone Jt Surg Br 75:228–232. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.75B2.8444942
Nam D, Weeks KD, Reinhardt KR et al (2013) Accelerometer-based, portable navigation versus imageless, large-console computer-assisted navigation in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 28:255–261. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2012.04.023
Nakata K, Nishikawa M, Yamamoto K et al (2009) A clinical comparative study of the direct anterior with mini-posterior approach: two consecutive series. J Arthroplasty 24:698–704. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2008.04.012
Grammatopoulos G, Gofton W, Cochran M et al (2018) Pelvic positioning in the supine position leads to more consistent orientation of the acetabular component after total hip arthroplasty. Bone Jt J 100-B:1280–1288. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620x.100b10.bjj-2018-0134.r1
Takada R, Jinno T, Miyatake K et al (2019) Supine versus lateral position for accurate positioning of acetabular cup in total hip arthroplasty using the modified Watson–Jones approach: a randomized single-blind controlled trial. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 105:915–922. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otsr.2019.05.004
Maeda Y, Sugano N, Nakamura N et al (2015) The accuracy of a mechanical cup alignment guide in total hip arthroplasty (THA) through direct anterior and posterior approaches measured with CT-based navigation. J Arthroplasty 30:1561–1564. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2015.04.011
Kawarai Y, Iida S, Nakamura J et al (2017) Does the surgical approach influence the implant alignment in total hip arthroplasty? Comparative study between the direct anterior and the anterolateral approaches in the supine position. Int Orthop 41:2487–2493. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-017-3521-3
Conflict of interest
Dr. Takada reports personal fees from Stryker, Medtronic Sofamor Danek, and HOYA, outside the submitted work. Dr. Jinno reports grants and personal fees from Stryker and personal fees from Zimmer Biomet and Depuy Synthes, outside the submitted work. Dr. Miyatake, Dr. Hirao, Dr. Yoshii, and Dr. Okawa declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Takada, R., Jinno, T., Miyatake, K. et al. Portable imageless navigation system and surgeon’s estimate for accurate evaluation of acetabular cup orientation during total hip arthroplasty in supine position. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-020-02625-2
- Acetabular cup orientation
- Total hip arthroplasty
- Portable imageless navigation system
- Range of motion