Asymmetrical thigh creases or isolated thigh crease may be a false positive sign with low predictive value in the diagnosis of developmental dysplasia of the hip in infants: a prospective cohort study of 117 patients
- 9 Downloads
The clinical importance of asymmetrical thigh creases in the diagnosis of developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) in infants remains controversial. The aim of this study is to investigate the association of asymmetrical skinfolds of the thigh as the only clinical finding with the DDH in infants.
One hundred and thirty-four infants between January 2010 and December 2015 were referred to our clinics for DDH with the only clinical sign being asymmetrical or isolated thigh creases and met the inclusion criteria of the study. Patients with another clinical sign for DDH in our initial evaluation, those infants suspicious for syndrome and those older than 6 months were excluded. Finally, 117 patients had undergone clinical and ultrasound evaluation and were included to statistical analysis.
There were 82 females and 35 males, with mean age of 2.2 months old. In 96 of the 117 infants (82.1%), there were provocative skin creases in the opposite thigh after a little pressure of the thigh by the examiner during the evaluation. Three of the babies (3.1%) with provocative skin creases and 1 (4.8%) with true isolated thigh crease had immature hips in ultrasonography. Positive predictive value for DDH of an isolated or asymmetrical thigh crease was 4.55% (95% CI 0.83–21.36%), and negative predictive value was 96.97% (95% CI 94.75–98.27%). Sensitivity of skinfold asymmetry found to be 25% (95% CI 0.63–80.59%), and specificity was 82.05% (95% CI 73.88–88.53%) for DDH.
The positive predictive value of asymmetrical or isolated thigh creases for DDH in infants was found to be low, as the majority of hips with normal clinical examination and asymmetry in thigh skinfolds seemed to be normal. Moreover, in-depth evaluation of the patients could highlight new provocative thigh creases in the opposite thigh, which could limit the referrals to expert physicians to exclude DDH.
Level of evidence
KeywordsAsymmetrical skin creases Isolated skin crease Developmental dysplasia of the hip Thigh crease
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
All authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- 2.Paton RW, Hossain S, Eccles K (2002) Eight-year prospective targeted ultrasound screening program for instability and at-risk hip joints in developmental dysplasia of the hip. J Pediatr Orthop 22(3):338–341Google Scholar
- 6.Wood MK, Conboy V, Benson MKD (2000) Does early treatment by abduction splintage improve the development of dysplastic but stable neonatal hips? J Pediatr Orthop 20(3):302–305Google Scholar
- 12.Ortolani M (1937) Un segno poco noto e sua importanza per la diagnosi precoce di prelussazione congenita dell’anca. Pediatria 45:129–136Google Scholar
- 14.Storer SK, Skaggs DL (2006) Developmental dysplasia of the hip. Am Fam Phys 74(8):1310–1316Google Scholar
- 19.De Pellegrin M (1991) Ultrasound screening for congenital dislocation of the hip. Results and correlations between clinical and ultrasound findings. Ital J Orthop Traumatol 17(4):547–553Google Scholar
- 22.Rosendahl K, Markestad T, Lie RT (1994) Ultrasound screening for developmental dysplasia of the hip in the neonate: the effect on treatment rate and prevalence of late cases. Pediatrics 94(1):47–52Google Scholar
- 24.Ömeroǧlu H, Koparal S (2001) The role of clinical examination and risk factors in the diagnosis of developmental dysplasia of the hip: a prospective study in 188 referred young infants. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 121(1–2):7–11Google Scholar
- 25.Ryder CT, Mellin GW, Caffey J (1962) The infant’s hipnormal or dysplastic? Clin Orthop 22:7–15Google Scholar
- 30.Palmen K (1961) Preluxation of the hip joint. Diagnosis and treatment in the newborn and the diagnosis of congenital dislocation of the hip joint in Sweden during the years 1948–1960. Acta Paediatr Suppl 50(129):1–71Google Scholar
- 34.Graf R, Tschauner C, Steindl M (1987) Need the Type-IIa hip be treated? A longitudinal ultrasound study of hips of infants less than three months old. Monatsschrift fur Kinderheilkunde 135(12):832–837Google Scholar