Outcomes of posterior cruciate ligament tibial avulsion treated with staple fixation: stress TELOS X-ray evaluation
- 39 Downloads
Tibial-side avulsion injuries of the posterior cruciate ligament are rare injuries. In displaced fracture, the reduction and fixation is the treatment of choice, although the optimal surgical management has not yet been determined. The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical, functional, and radiological outcome after an open reduction and internal fixation with staples of a posterior cruciate ligament tibial avulsion.
A historical cohort of patients who underwent open reduction and internal fixation with staple due to a posterior cruciate ligament tibial avulsion were reviewed. Minimum follow-up was 2 years. Demographic, clinical, and radiological data, including stress X-ray, were analyzed. Also, International Knee Documentation Committee Score, Tegner Knee Score, Lysholm Knee Score, Short-Form Health Survey, and four-point Likert scale were evaluated.
Four males (57%) and 3 females (43%) were included in the final analysis. The mean age was 39 years (range 27–54). All patients had a fracture union. No implant migration was observed. Postoperative posterior drawer, reverse pivot shift, and varus/valgus stress were negative. In stress TELOS X-ray, no statistically significant differences were observed between the postoperative and contralateral knee. All evaluated scores had good or excellent results.
Our study provides further evidence that the use of an open reduction and internal fixation with a staple could be a simple and reliable management for posterior cruciate ligament avulsion fractures of the tibia. In our study, the postoperative stress TELOS X-ray analyze showed a correct fixation and biomechanical function of the posterior cruciate ligament.
KeywordsKnee Posterior cruciate ligament Fracture Internal fixation Staple
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
No conflicts of interest were declared by the authors.
- 7.Pardiwala DN, Agrawal D, Patil V, Saini U, Dhawal P (2012) Paper 133: comparison of open versus arthroscopic fixation for isolated pcl tibial bony avulsions: a prospective randomized study with minimum 2 year follow-up. Arthroscopy 28:e413–e414. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2012.05.616 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 22.Zhang C, Xu H, Li MQ (2006) Posteromedial approach of gastrocnemius for reduction and internal fixation of avulsed tibial attachment of posterior cruciate ligament. Chin J Traumatol 9:25–28Google Scholar
- 23.Kashani FO, Mazloumi M, Ariamanesh A (2007) Fixation of tibial avulsion fractures of the posterior cruciate ligament using pull through suture and malleolar screw. J Res Med Sci 12:24–27Google Scholar
- 24.Nicandri GT, Klineberg EO, Wahl CJ, Mills WJ (2008) Treatment of posterior cruciate ligament tibial avulsion fractures through a modified open posterior approach: operative technique and 12- to 48-month outcomes. J Orthop Trauma 22:317–324. https://doi.org/10.1097/BOT.0b013e31817279d1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 26.Chiarapattanakom P, Pakpianpairoj C, Liupolvanish P, Malungpaishrope K (2009) Isolated PCl avulsion from the tibial attachment: residual laxity and function of the knee after screw fixation. J Med Assoc Thail 92:S181–S188Google Scholar
- 30.Lamichhane A, Mahara DP (2012) Management of posterior cruciate ligament avulsion by cannulated screw fixation. J Inst Med 34:28–31Google Scholar