Advertisement

The evolution and impact of the “damage control orthopedics” paradigm in combat surgery: a review

  • Georgios Kalinterakis
  • Antonios Koutras
  • Athanasios Syllaios
  • Nikolaos Michalakeas
  • Dimitrios Lytras
  • Ioannis Tsilikis
General Review • GENERAL ORTHOPAEDICS - TRAUMA
  • 15 Downloads

Abstract

The idea of damage control (DC) is grounded on a sequential therapeutic strategy that supports physiological restoration over anatomic repair in critically injured patients. This concept is firstly described as damage control surgery (DCS) for war-wounded patients with abdominal exsanguinating trauma. The goal was to avoid prolonged operative times and prevent the outset of the lethal cycle of hypothermia, acidosis and coagulopathy. Damage control orthopedics (DCO) is also based on this concept and it is applied in the treatment of some polytrauma patients with pelvic and long bones fractures as to avoid the “second hit” of a lengthy definitive operation and eliminate initial morbidity and mortality. It is in favor of primary fracture stabilization utilizing provisional external fixation. When the patient is in stable condition, conversion to definitive open reduction and intramedullary nailing can be done. This stepwise approach should be considered as a part of the resuscitation process, and it follows the saying “do no further harm”.

Keywords

Damage control surgery Trauma Damage control orthopedics War 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

All authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Giannoudis PV, Giannoudi M, Stavlas P (2009) Damage control orthopaedics: lessons learned. Injury 40(Suppl 4):S47–S52.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2009.10.036 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Rotondo MF, Schwab CW, McGonigal MD, Phillips GR, Fruchterman TM, Kauder DR et al (1993) ‘Damage control’: an approach for improved survival in exsanguinating penetrating abdominal injury. J Trauma 35(3):375–382 (discussion 382–383) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bowley DM, Barker P, Boffard KD (2000) Damage control surgery–concepts and practice. J R Army Med Corps 146(3):176–182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    McArthur BJ (2006) Damage control surgery for the patient who has experienced multiple traumatic injuries. AORN J 84(6):992–1000 (quiz 1001–1002) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Simmons JW, Powell MF (2016) Acute traumatic coagulopathy: pathophysiology and resuscitation. Br J Anaesth 117(suppl 3):iii31–iii43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Jaunoo SS, Harji DP (2009) Damage control surgery. Int J Surg Lond Engl 7(2):110–113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Mikhail J (1999) The trauma triad of death: hypothermia, acidosis, and coagulopathy. AACN Clin Issues 10(1):85–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    De Waele JJ, Vermassen FEG (2002) Coagulopathy, hypothermia and acidosis in trauma patients: the rationale for damage control surgery. Acta Chir Belg 102(5):313–316CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Pape HC, Giannoudis PV, Krettek C, Trentz O (2005) Timing of fixation of major fractures in blunt polytrauma: role of conventional indicators in clinical decision making. J Orthop Trauma 19(8):551–562CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Malgras B, Prunet B, Lesaffre X, Boddaert G, Travers S, Cungi P-J et al (2017) Damage control: concept and implementation. J Visc Surg 154(Suppl 1):S19–S29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Rao PP, Singh DV (2017) Combat surgery: status of tactical abbreviated surgical control. Med J Armed Forces India 73(4):407–409CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Giannoudis PV (2003) Surgical priorities in damage control in polytrauma. J Bone Jt Surg Br 85(4):478–483CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Pape H-C, Tornetta P, Tarkin I, Tzioupis C, Sabeson V, Olson SA (2009) Timing of fracture fixation in multitrauma patients: the role of early total care and damage control surgery. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 17(9):541–549CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hildebrand F, Giannoudis P, Kretteck C, Pape H-C (2004) Damage control: extremities. Injury 35(7):678–689CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Nicola R (2013) Early total care versus damage control: current concepts in the orthopedic care of polytrauma patients. ISRN Orthop 2013:329452.  https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/329452 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    D’Alleyrand JC, O’Toole RV (2013) The evolution of damage control orthopedics: current evidence and practical applications of early appropriate care. Orthop Clin North Am 44(4):499–507.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocl.2013.06.004 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Nahm NJ, Como JJ, Wilber JH, Vallier HA (2011) Early appropriate care: definitive stabilization of femoral fractures within 24 hours of injury is safe in most patients with multiple injuries. J Trauma 71(1):175–185.  https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0b013e3181fc93a2 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Vallier HA, Wang X, Moore TA, Wilber JH, Como JJ (2013) Timing of orthopaedic surgery in multiple trauma patients: development of a protocol for early appropriate care. J Orthop Trauma 27(10):543–551.  https://doi.org/10.1097/BOT.0b013e31829efda1 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Vallier HA, Dolenc AJ, Moore TA (2016) Early appropriate care: a protocol to standardize resuscitation assessment and to expedite fracture care reduces hospital stay and enhances revenue. J Orthop Trauma 30(6):306–311.  https://doi.org/10.1097/BOT.0000000000000524 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Costantini TW, Coimbra R, Holcomb JB et al (2016) Current management of hemorrhage from severe pelvic fractures: results of an American Association for the Surgery of Trauma multiinstitutional trial. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 80:717–723CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Coccolini F et al (2017) Pelvic trauma: WSES classification and guidelines. World J Emerg Surg 18(12):5.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s13017-017-0117-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Burlew CC et al (2017) Preperitoneal pelvic packing reduces mortality in patients with life-threatening hemorrhage due to unstable pelvic fractures. J. Trauma Acute Care Surg 82(2):233–242CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Mathieu L, Bazile F, Barthélémy R, Duhamel P, Rigal S (2011) Damage control orthopaedics in the context of battlefield injuries: the use of temporary external fixation on combat trauma soldiers. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res OTSR 97(8):852–859CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag France SAS, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Georgios Kalinterakis
    • 1
  • Antonios Koutras
    • 2
  • Athanasios Syllaios
    • 3
  • Nikolaos Michalakeas
    • 4
  • Dimitrios Lytras
    • 5
  • Ioannis Tsilikis
    • 6
  1. 1.Department of Orthopedics401 General Military HospitalAthensGreece
  2. 2.Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyLaiko University Hospital of AthensAthensGreece
  3. 3.1st Department of SurgeryLaiko University Hospital of AthensAthensGreece
  4. 4.Department of PathologyGeneral Hospital of KalamataKalamataGreece
  5. 5.Department of OrthopedicsGeneral Hospital of KarditsaKarditsaGreece
  6. 6.Department of Ιnterventional Radiology and Neuroradiology-Interventional CardiologyEuroclinicAthensGreece

Personalised recommendations