Advertisement

TEN versus external fixator in the management of pediatric diaphyseal femoral fractures: evaluation of the outcomes

  • Giuseppe Rollo
  • Pasquale Guida
  • Michele Bisaccia
  • Paolo Pichierri
  • Marco Filipponi
  • Riccardo Maria Lanzetti
  • Auro Caraffa
  • Alessandro Stasi
  • Valentina Russi
  • Domenico Lupariello
  • Luigi Meccariello
Original Article • LOWER LIMB - FRACTURES
  • 102 Downloads

Abstract

Introduction

Over the last 20 years, the incidence of pediatric diaphyseal femoral fractures was increased, due to changes in the children’s daily activities. The healing times are different according to the chosen treatment and to other factors such as age, type of fracture, involvement of the soft tissues, and concomitance with other injuries.

Materials and methods

From 2000 to 2015, 38 pediatric patients with diaphyseal femoral fractures were surgically treated and enrolled in the study. The average age of the patients was between 3 and 15 years. Twenty-two patients were treated with endomedullary titanium nails (TEN) and the other 16 with external axial fixators. Comparing the two groups, radiographic images were taken to assess the fracture reduction and consolidation.

Results

The average follow-up was 14 months. The average time needed to remove the TEN nails was 5 months; while 2.5 months was the time to remove the external fixator. At the final follow-up, there were no differences between two groups in term of significant rotation defects, angulation, growth, and/or nonunion.

Conclusions

This study showed that TENS and external fixation have similar results in term of fracture healing and complication, even if patients treated with TENS are more satisfied.

Keywords

Pediatric fractures Femoral fractures TEN External fixator 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Human and animal rights

This type of study does not require any statement relating to studies on humans and animals. All patients gave the informed consent prior to being included into the study. All procedures involving human participants were in accordance with the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments.

References

  1. 1.
    Flynn John M, Schwend Richard M (2004) Management of pediatric femoral shaft fractures. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 12:347–359CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Petković L, Djan I, Gajdobranski D, Marić D, Petković M (2011) Pediatric femur fractures, epidemiology and treatment. Vojnosanit Pregl 68(1):9–14CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kong H, Sabharwal S (2014) External fixation for closed pediatric femoral shaft fractures: where are we now? Clin Orthop Relat Res 472(12):3814–3822CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ferguson J, Nicol RO (2000) Early spica treatment of pediatric femoral shaft fractures. J PediatrOrthop. 20(2):189–192Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Berne D, Mary P, Damsin JP, Filipe G (2003) Femoral shaft fracture in children: treatment with early spica cast. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 89(7):599–604PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kosuge D, Barry M (2015) Changing trends in the management of children’s fractures. Bone Joint J 97-B(4):442–448CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    MacNeil JA, Francis A, El-Hawary R (2011) A systematic review of rigid, locked, intramedullary nail insertion sites and avascular necrosis of the femoral head in the skeletally immature. J Pediatr Orthop 31:377–380CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lanzetti RM, Caraffa A, Lupariello D, Ceccarini P, Gambaracci G, Meccariello L, Manfreda F, Maiettini D, Vicente CI, Scialpi M, Bisaccia O, Rinonapoli G, Bisaccia M (2018) Comparison between locked and unlocked intramedullary nails in intertrochanteric fractures. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 28(4):649–658CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lanzetti RM, Lupariello D, De Carli A, Monaco E, Guzzini M, Fabbri M, Vadalà A, Ferretti A (2017) Can the outside-in half-tunnel technique reduce femoral tunnel widening in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction? A CT study. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 27(5):659–664CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lanzetti RM, Ciompi A, Lupariello D, Guzzini M, De Carli A, Ferretti A (2017) Safety of third-generation artificial turf in male elite professional soccer players in Italian major league. Scand J Med Sci Sports 27(4):435–439CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    De Carli A, Lanzetti RM, Ciompi A, Lupariello D, Vadalà A, Argento G, Ferretti A, Vulpiani MC, Vetrano M (2016) Can platelet-rich plasma have a role in Achilles tendon surgical repair? Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 24(7):2231–2237CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Rathjen Karl E, Riccio Anthony I, De La Garza D (2007) Stainless steel flexible intramedullary fixation of unstable femoral shaft fractures in children. J Pediatr Orthop 27:432–441CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Greene Walter B (1998) Displaced fractures of the femoral shaft in children, unique features and therapeutic options. Clin Orthop Relat Res 353:86–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Stans AA, Morrissy RT, Renwick SE (1999) Femoral shaft fracture treatment in patients age 6 to 16 years. J Pediatr Orthop 19:222–228CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Miner T, Carrolo KL (2000) Outcomes of external fixation of pediatric femoral shaft fractures. J Pediatr Orthop 20:405–410PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Khan MI, Saqib M (2014) Outcome of external fixation in pediatric femoral shaft fractures. Pak J Surg 30(2):156–158Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Metaizeau JP (2004) Stable elastic intramedullary nailing for fractures of the femur in children. J Bone Joint Surg Br 86(7):954–957CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Ozdemir HM, Yensel U, Senaran H et al (2003) Immediate percutaneous intramedullary fixation and functional bracing for the treatment of pediatric femoral shaft fractures. J Pediatr Orthop 23:453–457PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Buchholz IM, Bolhuis HW, Broker FH et al (2002) Overgrowth and correction of rotational deformity in 12 femoral shaft fractures in 3-6-year-old children treated with an external fixatior. Acta Orthop Scand 73:170–174CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Sela Y, Hershkovich O, Sher-Lurie N, Schindler A, Givon U (2013) Pediatric femoral shaft fractures: treatment strategies according to age-13 years of experience in one medical center. J Orthop Surg Res 8:23.  https://doi.org/10.1186/1749-799X-8-23 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Khurram B, Humayun B (2006) Flexible intramedullary nailing versus external fixation of paediatric femoral fractures. Acta Orthop Belg 72:159–163Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Sponseller PD (2002) Surgical management of pediatric femoral fractures [review]. Instr Course Lect 51:361–365PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Wright JG, Wang EE, Owen JL, Stephens D, Graham HK, Hanlon M, Nattrass GR, Reynolds RA, Coyte P (2005) Treatments for paediatric femoral fractures: a randomised trial. Lancet 365(9465):1153–1158CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag France SAS, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Giuseppe Rollo
    • 1
  • Pasquale Guida
    • 2
  • Michele Bisaccia
    • 3
  • Paolo Pichierri
    • 1
  • Marco Filipponi
    • 1
  • Riccardo Maria Lanzetti
    • 3
    • 6
  • Auro Caraffa
    • 3
  • Alessandro Stasi
    • 1
  • Valentina Russi
    • 4
  • Domenico Lupariello
    • 5
  • Luigi Meccariello
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Orthopedics and TraumatologyVito Fazzi HospitalLecceItaly
  2. 2.Department of Orthopedics and TraumatologyPediatric Hospital Santobono PausiliponNaplesItaly
  3. 3.Division of Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery, S. Maria della Misericordia Hospital PerugiaUniversity of PerugiaPerugiaItaly
  4. 4.Orthopaedics and Traumatology DepartmentUniversity of PalermoPalermoItaly
  5. 5.University of Rome La SapienzaRomeItaly
  6. 6.U.O.C. Orthopedics and Traumatology Department, SM Misericordia HospitalUniversity of PerugiaPerugiaItaly

Personalised recommendations