Minimally invasive surgery and percutaneous surgery of the hindfoot and midfoot

Expert's Opinion • FOOT - MINIMAL SURGERY
  • 1 Downloads

Abstract

Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) and percutaneous (PC) surgery recently spread as a new technique in operative forefoot correction, and by extension in hindfoot and midfoot. Numerous procedures were described, and a race for MIS and PC has started. However, performing surgery with small incisions should not be an end in itself. Biomechanical and anatomical concerns must be taken into account and shall not be sacrificed for cosmetic reasons. For the most common hindfoot and midfoot pathologies, we discuss what we consider the surgical necessities and then describe the MIS and/or PC procedure we choose, according to these fundamentals.

Keywords

Minimally invasive surgery Percutaneous surgery Hindfoot Midfoot 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors have received or will receive benefits for personal or professional use from a commercial party related directly or indirectly to the subject of this article.

References

  1. 1.
    Lawrence JE, Nasr P, Fountain DM, Berman L, Robinson AH (2017) Functional outcomes of conservatively managed acute ruptures of the Achilles tendon. Bone Jt J 99-B(1):87–93.  https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620x.99b1.bjj-2016-0452.r1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Zhang H, Tang H, He Q, Wei Q, Tong D, Wang C, Wu D, Wang G, Zhang X, Ding W, Li D, Ding C, Liu K, Ji F (2015) Surgical VERSUS conservative intervention for acute achilles tendon rupture: a PRISMA-compliant systematic review of overlapping meta-analyses. Medicine (Baltimore) 94(45):e1951.  https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000001951 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Krueger H, David S (2016) The effectiveness of open repair versus percutaneous repair for an acute achilles tendon rupture. J Sport Rehabil 25(4):404–410.  https://doi.org/10.1123/jsr.2015-0024 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Li Q, Wang C, Huo Y, Jia Z, Wang X (2016) Minimally invasive versus open surgery for acute Achilles tendon rupture: a systematic review of overlapping meta-analyses. J Orthop Surg Res 11(1):65.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-016-0401-2 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Delponte P, Potier L, de Poulpiquet P, Buisson P (1992) Treatment of subcutaneous ruptures of the Achilles tendon by percutaneous tenorraphy. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 78(6):404–407PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Maes R, Copin G, Averous C (2006) Is percutaneous repair of the Achilles tendon a safe technique? A study of 124 cases. Acta Orthop Belg 72(2):179–183PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    McCormack R, Bovard J (2015) Early functional rehabilitation or cast immobilisation for the postoperative management of acute Achilles tendon rupture? A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Br J Sports Med 49(20):1329–1335.  https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2015-094935 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Carvalho FA, Kamper SJ (2016) Effects of early rehabilitation following operative repair of Achilles tendon rupture (PEDro synthesis). Br J Sports Med 50(13):829–830.  https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2016-096093 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Davies H, Agrawal Y, Blundell C, Davies MB (2017) Outcome following use of the Achillon jig for the repair of acutely ruptured Achilles tendons. Injury 48(3):781–783.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2017.01.018 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kolodziej L, Bohatyrewicz A, Kromuszczynska J, Jezierski J, Biedron M (2013) Efficacy and complications of open and minimally invasive surgery in acute Achilles tendon rupture: a prospective randomised clinical study—preliminary report. Int Orthop 37(4):625–629.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-012-1737-9 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ahn JH, Ahn CY, Byun CH, Kim YC (2015) Operative treatment of Haglund syndrome with central Achilles tendon-splitting approach. J Foot Ankle Surg 54(6):1053–1056.  https://doi.org/10.1053/j.jfas.2015.05.002 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Vernois J, Redfern D, Ferraz L, Laborde J (2015) Minimally invasive surgery osteotomy of the hindfoot. Clin Podiatr Med Surg 32(3):419–434.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpm.2015.03.008 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Lin C, Ma L, Chen W, Tao X, Yuan CS, Zhou BH, Tang KL (2017) A comparative study of the calcaneal closing-wedge calcaneal osteotomy versus posterior–superior prominence removal in both sides with Haglund syndrome. Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi 97(35):2733–2736.  https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.0376-2491.2017.35.004 PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Jarde O, Quenot P, Trinquier-Lautard JL, Tran-Van F, Vives P (1997) Haglund disease treated by simple resection of calcaneus tuberosity. An angular and therapeutic study. Apropos of 74 cases with 2 years follow-up. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 83(6):566–573PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Jerosch J (2015) Endoscopic calcaneoplasty. Foot Ankle Clin 20(1):149–165.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcl.2014.10.004 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Jerosch J, Nasef NM (2003) Endoscopic calcaneoplasty—rationale, surgical technique, and early results: a preliminary report. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 11(3):190–195.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-003-0365-8 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Leitze Z, Sella EJ, Aversa JM (2003) Endoscopic decompression of the retrocalcaneal space. J Bone Joint Surg Am 85-A(8):1488–1496CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Lohrer H, Nauck T, Dorn NV, Konerding MA (2006) Comparison of endoscopic and open resection for Haglund tuberosity in a cadaver study. Foot Ankle Int 27(6):445–450.  https://doi.org/10.1177/107110070602700610 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ortmann FW, McBryde AM (2007) Endoscopic bony and soft-tissue decompression of the retrocalcaneal space for the treatment of Haglund deformity and retrocalcaneal bursitis. Foot Ankle Int 28(2):149–153.  https://doi.org/10.3113/FAI.2007.0149 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Rak V, Matonoha P, Otahal M, Masek MM (2007) Vascularization of the lateral heel in relation to extensive skin incisions in osteosynthesis of calcaneal fractures. Rozhl Chir 86(9):483–488PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Andermahr J, Helling HJ, Rehm KE, Koebke Z (1999) The vascularization of the os calcaneum and the clinical consequences. Clin Orthop Relat Res 363:212–218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Bauer T (2016) Percutaneous Hindfoot and Midfoot fusion. Foot Ankle Clin 21(3):629–640.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcl.2016.04.008 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Probe R (2016) In situ subtalar arthrodesis for posttraumatic arthritis of the calcaneus. J Orthop Trauma 30(Suppl 2):S45–S46.  https://doi.org/10.1097/BOT.0000000000000609 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Roster B, Kreulen C, Giza E (2015) Subtalar joint arthrodesis: open and arthroscopic indications and surgical techniques. Foot Ankle Clin 20(2):319–334.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcl.2015.02.003 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Tuijthof GJ, Beimers L, Kerkhoffs GM, Dankelman J, Dijk CN (2010) Overview of subtalar arthrodesis techniques: options, pitfalls and solutions. Foot Ankle Surg 16(3):107–116.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fas.2009.07.002 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Neufeld SK, Uribe J, Myerson MS (2002) Use of structural allograft to compensate for bone loss in arthrodesis of the foot and ankle. Foot Ankle Clin 7(1):1–17CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Lapidus PW (1960) The author’s bunion operation from 1931 to 1959. Clin Orthop 16:119–135PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Clark HR, Veith RG, Hansen ST Jr (1987) Adolescent bunions treated by the modified Lapidus procedure. Bull Hosp Jt Dis Orthop Inst 47(2):109–122PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Cottom JM, Baker JS (2017) Comparison of locking plate with interfragmentary screw versus plantarly applied anatomic locking plate for Lapidus Arthrodesis: a biomechanical cadaveric study. Foot Ankle Spec 10(3):227–231.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1938640016676341 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Plaass C, Claassen L, Daniilidis K, Fumy M, Stukenborg-Colsman C, Schmiedl A, Ettinger S (2016) Placement of plantar plates for lapidus arthrodesis: anatomical considerations. Foot Ankle Int 37(4):427–432.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1071100715619607 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Simons P, Frober R, Loracher C, Knobe M, Gras F, Hofmann GO, Klos K (2015) First tarsometatarsal arthrodesis: an anatomic evaluation of dorsomedial versus plantar plating. J Foot Ankle Surg 54(5):787–792.  https://doi.org/10.1053/j.jfas.2014.12.028 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Roth KE, Peters J, Schmidtmann I, Maus U, Stephan D, Augat P (2014) Intraosseous fixation compared to plantar plate fixation for first metatarsocuneiform arthrodesis: a cadaveric biomechanical analysis. Foot Ankle Int 35(11):1209–1216.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1071100714547082 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Gutteck N, Wohlrab D, Zeh A, Radetzki F, Delank KS, Lebek S (2015) Immediate fullweightbearing after tarsometatarsal arthrodesis for hallux valgus correction—Does it increase the complication rate? Foot Ankle Surg 21(3):198–201.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fas.2014.11.010 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag France SAS, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Hôpital Raymond PoincaréGarchesFrance
  2. 2.Clinique Victor HugoParisFrance
  3. 3.Hôpital Hôtel-DieuParisFrance

Personalised recommendations