Advertisement

Cortical onlay strut allograft with cerclage wiring of periprosthetic fractures of the humerus without stem loosening: technique and preliminary results

  • André Thés
  • Shahnaz KloucheEmail author
  • Marine de Tienda
  • Thomas Bauer
  • Philippe Hardy
Technical Note • SHOULDER - ARTHROPLASTY

Abstract

The goal of this study was to describe an internal fixation technique for periprosthetic humeral fractures using a cortical onlay strut allograft stabilized with cerclage wires and to evaluate the preliminary results of this approach. An anterolateral approach was used to direct access the fracture and to protect the radial nerve. The fracture was reduced with two forceps, under visual control. The fracture was surrounded by two hemicylinder tibial allografts, placed around the humerus with no prior reaming to create a “sarcophagus” system. The allograft was as long as possible for optimal mechanical stability, without creating impingement with the glenoid and the elbow. Final fixation of the allograft was obtained with two cerclage wires. The arm was immobilized in a simple sling. Passive then active rehabilitation was begun after 1 month. Six women, mean age 74.3 ± 10.9 years old, were included in the study between 2013 and 2015 with a mean follow-up of 10 ± 2 months. Bone union was obtained in all patients after 6 months of follow-up with no recurrent fractures.

Keywords

Shoulder arthroplasty Periprosthetic fractures Sarcophagus technique Internal fixation 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

T. Bauer is consultant for Arthrex. P. Hardy is consultant for Arthrex and Zimmer. The other authors (A. Thès, S. Klouche, M. de Tienda) declare that they have no conflicts of interest concerning this article.

IRB/Ethical committee

According to the past Huriet law on biomedical research and to the current regulation that went into effect in August 2006 (law n°2004-806), such studies do not require prior submission or approval to/from an IRB, and they do not require written consent. The database was declared at the National Commission for Data Protection (Commission Nationale de l’Informatique et des Libertés, CNIL, No. 470235).

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

References

  1. 1.
    Bohsali KI, Wirth MA, Rockwood CA (2006) Complications of total shoulder arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 88:2279–2292. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.F.00125 PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Boyd AD, Thornhill TS, Barnes CL (1992) Fractures adjacent to humeral prostheses. J Bone Joint Surg Am 74:1498–1504CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Cameron B, Iannotti JP (1999) Periprosthetic fractures of the humerus and scapula: management and prevention. Orthop Clin North Am 30:305–318CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Chandler HP, King D, Limbird R, Hedley A, McCarthy J, Penenberg B, Danylchuck K (1993) The use of cortical allograft struts for fixation of fractures associated with well-fixed total joint prostheses. Semin Arthroplasty 4:99–107PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Constant CR, Murley AH (1987) A clinical method of functional assessment of the shoulder. Clin Orthop 1987:160–164Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gogus A, Ozturk C, Tezer M, Çamurdan K, Hamzaoglu A (2007) “Sandwich technique” in the surgical treatment of primary complex fractures of the femur and humerus. Int Orthop 31:87–92. doi: 10.1007/s00264-006-0134-7 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Haddad FS, Duncan CP, Berry DJ, Lewallen DG, Gross AE, Chandler HP (2002) Periprosthetic femoral fractures around well-fixed implants: use of cortical onlay allografts with or without a plate. J Bone Joint Surg Am 84:945–950CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hornicek FJ, Zych GA, Hutson JJ, Malinin TI (2001) Salvage of humeral nonunions with onlay bone plate allograft augmentation. Clin Orthop Relat Res (386):203–209Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Khashan M, Amar E, Drexler M, Chechik O, Cohen Z, Steinberg EL (2013) Superior outcome of strut allograft-augmented plate fixation for the treatment of periprosthetic fractures around a stable femoral stem. Injury 44:1556–1560. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2013.04.025 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kumar S, Sperling JW, Haidukewych GH, Cofield RH (2004) Periprosthetic humeral fractures after shoulder arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 86:680–689CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Martinez AA, Calvo A, Cuenca J, Herrera A (2011) Internal fixation and strut allograft augmentation for periprosthetic humeral fractures. J Orthop Surg Hong Kong 19:191–193. doi: 10.1177/230949901101900212 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Michener LA, McClure PW, Sennett BJ (2002) American shoulder and elbow surgeons standardized shoulder assessment form, patient self-report section: reliability, validity, and responsiveness. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 11:587–594. doi: 10.1067/mse.2002.127096 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Mineo GV, Accetta R, Franceschini M, Pedrotti Dell’Acqua G, Calori GM, Meersseman A (2013) Management of shoulder periprosthetic fractures: our institutional experience and review of the literature. Injury 44:S82–S85. doi: 10.1016/S0020-1383(13)70018-4 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Sanchez-Sotelo J, Cofield RH, Rowland CM (2001) Shoulder hemiarthroplasty for glenohumeral arthritis associated with severe rotator cuff deficiency. J Bone Joint Surg Am 83-A:1814–1822CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Van Houwelingen AP, McKee MD (2005) Treatment of osteopenic humeral shaft nonunion with compression plating, humeral cortical allograft struts, and bone grafting. J Orthop Trauma 19:36–42CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Worland RL, Kim DY, Arredondo J (1999) Periprosthetic humeral fractures: management and classification. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 8:590–594CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag France 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Hôpitaux Universitaires Paris Ile de France Ouest, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de ParisBoulogne-BillancourtFrance
  2. 2.Université de Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines, UFR des Sciences de la SantéVersaillesFrance
  3. 3.Ambroise Paré HospitalBoulogne-BillancourtFrance

Personalised recommendations