The effect of the metal-on-metal hip controversy on Internet search activity

Original Article

Abstract

The recall of the articular surface replacement (ASR) hip prosthesis in 2010 represents one of the most controversial areas in orthopaedic surgery in recent years. The aim of this study was to compare the impact of the metal-on-metal hip controversy on Internet search activity in four different regions and determine whether the number of related news reports affected Internet search activity. The Google Trends, Keywords and News applications were used to record the number of news articles and Internet search activity for the terms “hip recall”, “metal-on-metal hip” and “ASR hip” from October 2009 to October 2012 in the USA, the UK, Australia and Ireland. There was a large increase in search activity following the official recall in August 2010 in all countries. There was significantly greater search activity after the recall in Ireland compared with the UK for the search term “hip recall” (P = 0.004). For the term “metal-on-metal hip”, the UK had significantly more search activity (P = 0.0009). There was a positive correlation between the number of news stories in UK and Ireland with Internet search activity but not in the USA or Australia. Differences between countries affected by the same recall highlight the complex effects of the media on public awareness. The data demonstrates a window of opportunity prior to the official recall for the development of an awareness campaign to provide patients with accurate information.

Keywords

Hip arthroplasty Metal-on-metal Google Trends Internet Patient information 

Notes

Conflict of interest

None.

References

  1. 1.
    Wiles P (1958) The surgery of the osteoarthritic hip. Br J Surg 45(193):488–497PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Judet J, Judet R (1950) The use of an artificial femoral head for arthroplasty of the hip joint. J Bone Joint Surg Br 32-B(2):166–173PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Fischer LP, Planchamp W, Fischer B, Chauvin F (2000) The first total hip prostheses in man (1890–1960). Hist Sci Med 34(1):57–70PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Learmonth ID, Young C, Rorabeck C (2007) The operation of the century: total hip replacement. Lancet 370(9597):1508–1519. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(07)60457-7 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Zahiri CA, Schmalzried TP, Ebramzadeh E, Szuszczewicz ES, Salib D, Kim C, Amstutz HC (1999) Lessons learned from loosening of the McKee-Farrar metal-on-metal total hip replacement. J Arthroplast 14(3):326–332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Schmalzried TP, Peters PC, Maurer BT, Bragdon CR, Harris WH (1996) Long-duration metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasties with low wear of the articulating surfaces. J Arthroplast 11(3):322–331CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry annual report 2007. https://aoanjrr.dmac.adelaide.edu.au. Accessed 1 Oct 2012
  8. 8.
    Cohen D (2012) How safe are metal-on-metal hip implants? BMJ 344:e1410. doi:10.1136/bmj.e1410 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Grilli R, Ramsay C, Minozzi S (2002) Mass media interventions: effects on health services utilisation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (1):CD000389. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD000389
  10. 10.
    Google Trends. http://www.google.com/trends/. Accessed 3 Jan 2013
  11. 11.
    Google Keywords. http://adwords.google.com. Accessed 3 Jan 2013
  12. 12.
    Google News. http://news.google.com. Accessed 15 Feb 2013
  13. 13.
    Ginsberg J, Mohebbi MH, Patel RS, Brammer L, Smolinski MS, Brilliant L (2009) Detecting influenza epidemics using search engine query data. Nature 457(7232):1012–1014. doi:10.1038/nature07634 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
  15. 15.
    Updates on advice for metal-on-metal hip replacements. http://www.mhra.gov.uk/home. Accessed 2 Jan 2013
  16. 16.
    Health warning over hip implants. http://www.telegraph.co.uk (Donnelly L). Accessed 12 Dec 2012
  17. 17.
    Smith AJ, Dieppe P, Vernon K, Porter M, Blom AW (2012) Failure rates of stemmed metal-on-metal hip replacements: analysis of data from the National Joint Registry of England and Wales. Lancet 379(9822):1199–1204. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60353-5 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    ABC News Australia. http://www.abc.net.au/4corners. Accessed 24 Jan 2013
  19. 19.
    Australian Government Therapeutic Goods Administration. http://www.tga.gov.au/newsroom/btn-dupuy-recall.htm. Accessed 7 Jan 2013
  20. 20.
    New York Times. http://www.nytimes.com/ (Barry Meier). Accessed 12 Nov 2012
  21. 21.
    Glynn RW, Kelly JC, Coffey N, Sweeney KJ, Kerin MJ (2011) The effect of breast cancer awareness month on internet search activity—a comparison with awareness campaigns for lung and prostate cancer. BMC Cancer 11:442. doi:10.1186/1471-2407-11-442 PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Deary IJ, Whiteman MC, Fowkes FG (1998) Medical research and the popular media. Lancet 351(9117):1726–1727PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Bartlett C, Sterne J, Egger M (2002) What is newsworthy? Longitudinal study of the reporting of medical research in two British newspapers. BMJ 325(7355):81–84. doi:10.1136/bmj.325.7355.81 PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    The Pew Research Group Internet & American Life Project Winter 2012 Tracking Survey. www.pewinternet.org. Accessed 10 Jan 2013
  25. 25.
    Cooper CP, Mallon KP, Leadbetter S, Pollack LA, Peipins LA (2005) Cancer internet search activity on a major search engine, United States 2001–2003. J Med Internet Res 7(3):e36. doi:10.2196/jmir.7.3.e36 PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Weeks BE, Friedenberg LM, Southwell BG, Slater JS (2012) Behavioral consequences of conflict-oriented health news coverage: the 2009 mammography guideline controversy and online information seeking. Health Commun 27(2):158–166. doi:10.1080/10410236.2011.571757 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Morr S, Shanti N, Carrer A, Kubeck J, Gerling MC (2010) Quality of information concerning cervical disc herniation on the internet. Spine J 10(4):350–354. doi:10.1016/j.spinee.2010.02.009 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Jariwala AC, Kandasamy, Abboud RJ, Wigderowitz CA (2004) Patients and the internet: a demographic study of a cohort of orthopaedic out-patients. Surgeon 2(2):103–106Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Nason GJ, Baker Byrne DP, Noel J, Moore D, Kiely PJ (2012) Scoliosis-specific information on the internet: has the “information highway” led to better information provision? Spine 37(21):E1364–E1369. doi:10.1097/BRS.0b013e31826619b5 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag France 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Orthopaedic SurgeryCappagh National Orthopaedic HospitalDublinIreland

Personalised recommendations