Two-stage, combined, three-level en bloc spondylectomy for a recurrent post-radiation sarcoma of the lumbar spine

  • Roberto Casadei
  • Andreas F. Mavrogenis
  • Massimiliano De Paolis
  • Pietro Ruggieri
Technical Note
First Online:
Received:
Accepted:

Abstract

En bloc or extralesional resection means resection of the tumor in one piece together with a layer of healthy tissue: the margin is either marginal or wide. The prerequisite for an en bloc or extralesional spondylectomy is a tumor involvement of no more than one side of the posterior structures, so that a corridor can be created through which the spinal cord is released. This article presents a two-stage, combined anterior and posterolateral, three-level en bloc spondylectomy, and local flap wound coverage for a patient with a recurrent post-radiation sarcoma of the lumbar spine and infected wound after intralesional treatment. The patient had radiation therapy for an L4 Hodgkin’s lymphoma 5 years before the development of the post-radiation sarcoma. Two-stage, three-level en bloc spondylectomy was done through a combined anterior and posterolateral approach. The resection margins were microscopically negative. Dural tear occurred intraoperatively because of tightly adherent dense scar tissue. Two years after spondylectomy, there was no evidence of tumor or infection recurrence; however, the patient died from her lymphoma. In surgically difficult spinal resections, we recommend the two-stage, combined anterior and posterolateral approach for en bloc spondylectomy. The staged procedure may provide for reduced perioperative complications and mortality, and meticulous dissection in the irradiated area, especially if infected. The combined approach provides for easier and safer dissection of the tumor and the spine from the anterior elements under direct visual control, and wide tumor resection.

Keywords

En bloc spondylectomy Post-radiation sarcoma Lumbar spine 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Notes

Conflict of interest

None of the authors declare any conflict of interest, grant or financial profit related with the study that might inappropriately bias their work.

References

  1. 1.
    Weatherby RP, Dahlin DC, Ivins JC (1981) Postirradiation sarcoma of bone: review of 78 Mayo Clinic cases. Mayo Clin Proc 56:294–306PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Huvos AG, Woodard HQ, Cahan WG et al (1985) Postradiation osteogenic sarcoma of bone and soft tissues. A clinicopathologic study of 66 patients. Cancer 55(6):1244–1255PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Inoue YZ, Frassica FJ, Sim FH et al (2000) Clinicopathologic features and treatment of post-irradiation sarcoma of bone and soft tissue. J Surg Oncol 75:42–50PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Sheppard DG, Libshitz HI (2001) Post-radiation sarcomas: a review of the clinical and imaging features in 63 cases. Clin Radiol 56:22–29PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cannon CP, Ballo MT, Zagars GK et al (2006) Complications of combined modality treatment of primary lower extremity soft-tissue sarcomas. Cancer 107:2455–2461PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hundsdoerfer P, Albrecht M, Rühl U et al (2009) Long-term outcome after polychemotherapy and intensive local radiation therapy of high-grade osteosarcoma. Eur J Cancer 45:2447–2451PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Shapeero LG, De Visschere PJL, Verstraete KL et al (2009) Post-treatment complications of soft tissue tumours. Eur J Radiol 69:209–221PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Erel E, Vlachou E, Athanasiadou M et al (2010) Management of radiation-induced sarcomas in a tertiary referral centre: a review of 25 cases. Breast 19(5):424–427PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Arlen M, Higinbotham NL, Huvos AG et al (1971) Radiation-induced sarcoma of bone. Cancer 28(5):1087–1099PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bobin JY, Rivoire M, Delay E et al (1994) Radiation induced sarcomas following treatment for breast cancer: presentation of a series of 14 cases treated with an aggressive surgical approach. J Surg Oncol 57(3):171–177PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lagrange JL, Ramaioli A, Chateau MC et al (2000) Sarcoma after radiation therapy: retrospective multiinstitutional study of 80 histologically confirmed cases. Radiation Therapist and Pathologist Groups of the Fédération Nationale des Centres de Lutte Contre le Cancer. Radiology 216(1):197–205PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Weinstein JN, McLain RF (1987) Primary tumors of the spine. Spine 12:843–851PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Tomita K, Kawahara N, Baba H et al (1997) Total en bloc spondylectomy. A new surgical technique for primary malignant vertebral tumors. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 22(3):324–333CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Boriani S, Biagini R, DeLure F (1996) En bloc resections of bone tumors of the thoracolumbar spine. Spine 21:1927–1931PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Heary R, Vaccaro A, Benevenia J et al (1998) “En bloc” vertebrectomy in the mobile lumbar spine. Surg Neurol 50:548–556PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Bilsky MH, Boland P, Lis E et al (2000) Single-stage posterolateral transpedicle approach for spondylectomy, epidural decompression, and circumferential fusion of spinal metastases. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 25(17):2240–2250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Liljenqvist U, Lerner T, Halm H et al (2008) En bloc spondylectomy in malignant tumors of the spine. Eur Spine J 17(4):600–609PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Stener B (1989) Complete removal of vertebrae for extirpation of tumors: a 20-year experience. Clin Orthop Rel Res 245:72–82Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Roy-Camille R, Saillant G, Mazel Ch, Monpierre H (1990) Total vertebrectomy as treatment of malignant tumors of the spine. Chir Organ Mov 75:94–96Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Roy-Camille R, Mazel Ch (1991) Vertebrectomy through an enlarged posterior approach for tumors and malunions. In: Bridwell KH, De Wald RL (eds) The text book of spinal surgery. Lippincott, Philadelphia, pp 1245–1256Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Fidler MW (1994) Radical resection of vertebral body tumors: a surgical technique used in ten cases. J Bone Joint Surg Br 76B:765–772Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Fisher C, Keynan O, Boyd M et al (2005) The surgical management of primary tumors of the spine. Spine 30:1899–1908PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Krepler P, Windhager R, Bretschneider W et al (2002) Total vertebrectomy for primary malignant tumours of the spine. J Bone Joint Surg Br 84B:712–715CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Mazel C, Grunenwald D, Laudrin P, Marmorat JL (2003) Radical excision in the management of thoracic and cervicothoracic tumors involving the spine: results in a series of 36 cases. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 28(8):782–792Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Hardes J, Gosheger G, Halm H et al (2003) Three-level en bloc spondylectomy for desmoplastic fibroma of the thoracic spine: a case report. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 28(9):E169–E172Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Oda I, Cunningham BW, Abumi K et al (1999) The stability of reconstruction methods after thoracolumbar total spondylectomy. An in vitro investigation. Spine 24(16):1634–1638PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Boriani S, Weinstein JN, Biagini R (1997) Primary bone tumors of the spine: terminology and surgical staging. Spine 22:1036–1044PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Talac R, Yaszemski M, Currier B et al (2002) Relationship between surgical margins and local recurrence in sarcomas of the spine. Clin Orthop Rel Res 397:127–132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Grunenwald D, Mazel C, Girard P et al (1996) Total vertebrectomy for en bloc resection of lung cancer invaded the spine. Ann Thorac Surg 61:723–726PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Abe E, Kobayashi T, Murai H et al (2001) Total spondylectomy for primary malignant, aggressive benign, and solitary metastatic bone tumors of the thoracolumbar spine. J Spinal Disord 14(3):237–246PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Samartzis D, Marco RA, Benjamin R et al (2005) Multilevel en bloc spondylectomy and chest wall excision via a simultaneous anterior and posterior approach for Ewing sarcoma. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 30(7):831–837CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Cahill DW, Kumar R (1999) Palliative subtotal vertebrectomy with anterior and posterior reconstruction via a single posterior approach. J Neurosurg 90(1 Suppl):42–47PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Magerl F, Coscia MF (1988) Total posterior vertebrectomy of the thoracic or lumbar spine. Clin Orthop Relat Res 232:62–69PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Fourney DR, Abi-Said D, Rhines LD et al (2001) Simultaneous anteriorposterior approach to the thoracic and lumbar spine for the radical resection of tumors followed by reconstruction and stabilization. J Neurosurg 94(2 Suppl):232–244PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Yao KC, Boriani S, Gokaslan ZL, Sundaresan N (2003) En bloc spondylectomy for spinal metastases: a review of techniques. Neurosurg Focus 15(5):E6PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Disch AC, Schaser KD, Melcher I et al (2008) En bloc spondylectomy reconstructions in a biomechanical in vitro study. Eur Spine J 17(5):715–725PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Shannon FJ, DiResta GR, Ottaviano D et al (2004) Biomechanical analysis of anterior polymethyl-methacrylate reconstruction following total spondylectomy for metastatic disease. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 29(19):2096–2112PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Kunisada T, Ngan SY, Powell G, Choong PF (2002) Wound complications following pre-operative radiotherapy for soft tissue sarcoma. Eur J Surg Oncol 28:75–79PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Stone HB, Coleman CN, Anscher MS, McBride WH (2003) Effects of radiation on normal tissue: consequences and mechanisms. Lancet Oncol 4:529–536PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Cheon YW, Lee MC, Kim YS et al (2010) Gluteal artery perforator flap: a viable alternative for sacral radiation ulcer and osteoradionecrosis. J Plast Recon Aesthrt Surg 63:642–647CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Rossi G, Mavrogenis AF, Rimondi E et al (2011) Selective arterial embolisation for bone tumours: experience of 454 cases. Radiol Med 116(5):793–808PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Rossi G, Mavrogenis AF, Rimondi E et al (2011) Selective embolization with N-butyl cyanoacrylate for metastatic bone disease. J Vasc Interv Radiol 22(4):462–470PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Barton PP, Waneck RE, Karnel FJ et al (1996) Embolization of bone metastases. J Vasc Interv Radiol 7(1):81–88PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag France 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Roberto Casadei
    • 1
  • Andreas F. Mavrogenis
    • 1
  • Massimiliano De Paolis
    • 1
  • Pietro Ruggieri
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Orthopaedics, Istituto Ortopedico RizzoliUniversity of BolognaBolognaItaly

Personalised recommendations