Preoperative grip strength measurement and duration of hospital stay in patients undergoing total hip and knee arthroplasty

  • A. J. Shyam Kumar
  • N. Beresford-ClearyEmail author
  • P. Kumar
  • A. Barai
  • N. Vasukutty
  • S. Yasin
  • A. Sinha
Original Article



This study explored whether a relationship exists between preoperative pinch and power grip strength, and length of hospital stay in patients undergoing hip and knee arthroplasty at a busy UK hospital. We investigated whether handgrip dynamometry could be used preoperatively to identify patients at greater risk of longer inpatient stays. This would allow focussed intervention preoperatively and facilitate predictors of length of stay postoperatively.


One hundred and sixty-four patients (64 male, 100 female) undergoing lower limb arthroplasty (83 total knee replacement, 81 total hip replacement) were assessed in pre-admission clinic. Average measurements of pinch grip, power grip and grip endurance were taken from each patient using the Jamar hydraulic dynamometer (Jamar, USA). Duration of inpatient stay of each patient was recorded.


Average duration of hospital stay was 9.4 days. Both average pinch grip strength and average power grip strength had a significant negative correlation with duration of inpatient stay. Those patients with a pinch grip strength less than 6.3 kg remained an inpatient for an average of 2 days longer than those with a pinch grip greater than 6.3 kg.


This simple test may be highly beneficial preoperatively in identifying those patients likely to require longer inpatient stays and therefore those who would benefit from early nutritional intervention and focussed physiotherapy. It may also facilitate predictors of length of stay postoperatively. We believe this may effect significant cost reductions in the NHS.


Hand strength Nutritional status Length of stay Arthroplasty 


Conflict of interest

The authors declare they have no conflict of interest. All authors have approved the manuscript and are fully conversant with its contents. No author has any potential or actual personal, financial or political interest in the material. An abstract of the work has not previously been published nor have any papers using the same data set or relating to the same topic been published or submitted by any of the authors for consideration elsewhere. There is no patient identifiable information included in the manuscript.


  1. 1.
    Gregg JR, Cookson MS, Phillips S et al (2011) Effect of preoperative nutritional deficiency on mortality after radical cystectomy for bladder cancer. J Urol 185(1):90–96PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Awad S, Lobo DN (2011) What’s new in perioperative nutritional support? Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 24(3):339–348PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Klidjian AM, Foster KJ, Kammerling RM, Cooper A, Karran SJ (1980) Relation of anthropometric and dynamometric variables to serious postoperative complications. Br Med J 281(6245):899–901PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Klidjian AM, Archer J, Foster KJ, Karranet SJ (1982) Detection of dangerous malnutrition. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr 6(2):119–121PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hunt DR, Rowlands BJ, Johnston D (1985) Hand grip strength—a simple prognostic indicator in surgical patients. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr 9(6):701–704PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Watter JM, Clancey SM, Moulton SB, Briere KM, Zhu JM (1993) Impaired recovery of strength in older patients after major abdominal surgery. Ann Surg 218(3):380–390 discussion 390–393CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Griffith CD, Whyman M, Bassey EJ, Hopkinson BR, Makin GS (1989) Delayed recovery of hand grip strength predicts postoperative morbidity following major vascular surgery. Br J Surg 76(7):704–705PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
  9. 9.
    Mathiowetz V, Weber K, Volland G, Kashman N (1984) Reliability and validity of grip and pinch strength evaluations. J Hand Surg Am 9(2):222–226PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Davies CW, Jones DM, Shearer JR (1984) Hand grip—a simple test for morbidity after fracture of the neck of femur. J R Soc Med 77(10):833–836PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Bohannon RW (2008) Hand-grip dynamometry predicts future outcomes in aging adults. J Geriatr Phys Ther 31(1):3–10PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Norman K, Schutz T, Kemps M, Josef Lubke H, Lochs H, Pirlich M (2005) The subjective global assessment reliably identifies malnutrition-related muscle dysfunction. Clin Nutr 24(1):143–150PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Edwards C, Counsell A, Boulton C, Moran CG (2008) Early infection after hip fracture surgery: risk factors, costs and outcome. J Bone Joint Surg Br 90(6):770–777PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Abraham A, Hajipour L, Innes AR, Phillips H, McCaskie AW (2006) Are national guidelines for total hip replacement in the UK reflected in practice? Ann R Coll Surg Engl 88(2):108–115PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. J. Shyam Kumar
    • 1
  • N. Beresford-Cleary
    • 1
    Email author
  • P. Kumar
    • 2
  • A. Barai
    • 2
  • N. Vasukutty
    • 2
  • S. Yasin
    • 2
  • A. Sinha
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Orthopaedic SurgeryRoyal Lancaster InfirmaryLancasterUK
  2. 2.Glan Clwyd Hospital, RhylDenbighshireUK

Personalised recommendations