Observer variability in the assessment of the acromiohumeral interval using anteroposterior shoulder radiographs
- 290 Downloads
An acromiohumeral interval narrower than 6 mm measured on AP shoulder radiographs has been considered pathological and suggestive of rotator cuff tears. This prospective study was conducted to assess inter- and intraobserver variation in the radiographic assessment of the acromiohumeral interval and its critical value on routinely taken AP shoulder radiographs off-study use to evaluate the accuracy of this measurement method.
The acromiohumeral distance from the inferior anterior acromial aspect to the humeral head was measured in millimeters. Thirty blinded, anteroposterior shoulder radiographs were independently reviewed by five board-certified orthopedic shoulder surgeons at two time points in random order.
The results of three investigators showed significant intraobserver variation. Five investigator pairs showed significant interobserver variation at both examination time points. The maximum interobserver difference for the same radiograph was 8 mm (range 0 to 8 mm).
Our results indicate that the assessment of the acromiohumeral interval using non-standardized anteroposterior radiographs off-study use cannot be seen as a reproducible and reliable method of measurement.
KeywordsShoulder X-ray Radiography Acromiohumeral interval Distance measurement Rotator cuff
Conflict of interest
- 2.Pijls BG, Kok FP, Penning LIF, Guldemond NA, Arens HJ (2009) Reliability study of the sonographic measurement of the acromiohumeral distance in symptomatic patients. J Clin Ultrasound 38:128–134Google Scholar
- 5.Graichen H, Bonel H, Stammberger T, Haubner M, Rohrer H, Englmeier KH, Reiser M, Eckstein F (1999) Three-dimensional analysis of the width of the subacromial space in healthy subjects and patients with impingement syndrome. Am J Roentgenol 172:1081–1086Google Scholar
- 9.Cotton RE, Rideout DF (1964) Tears of the humeral rotator cuff: a radiological and pathological necropsy survey. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 46:314–328Google Scholar
- 12.Hardy D, Vogler JB 3rd, White RH (1986) The shoulder impingement syndrome: prevalence of radiographic findings and correlation with response to therapy. Am J Roentgenol 147:557–561Google Scholar
- 16.Weiner D, Macnab I (1970) Superior migration of the humeral head: a radiological aid in the diagnosis of tears of the rotator cuff. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 52:524–527Google Scholar
- 20.O’Regan D, Harvey CJ, Allen SD (2006) Interpretation of the shoulder radiograph. Br J Hosp Med 67:27–29Google Scholar
- 26.Teefey SA, Rubin DA, Middleton WD et al (2004) Detection and quantification of rotator cuff tears. Comparison of ultrasonographic, magnetic resonance imaging, and arthroscopic findings in seventy-one consecutive cases. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 86:708–716Google Scholar