Advertisement

Closed femoral intramedullary nailing in the lateral decubitus position with the aid of intraoperative skeletal traction

  • Kap Jung Kim
  • Won-Sik Choy
  • Sang Ki Lee
  • Hyun Jong Park
Original Article

Abstract

The closed intramedullary nailing is the treatment of choice for femoral diaphyseal fractures. These procedures typically have been performed on a fracture table with either supine or lateral position. However, the use of a fracture table has a lot of disadvantages compared to a lateral position on radiolucent routine table. We reviewed one hundred and twenty-eight patients with femur fractures between 2005 and 2009, who were treated with closed femoral intramedullary nailing in lateral decubitus position on radiolucent routine table. Indirect reduction was facilitated by the aid of intraoperative skeletal traction. Clinical and radiologic results were evaluated. There were no rotational or length malreductions that required surgical revision. There were no injuries to the perineum or contralateral leg, nerve palsies, or fracture table–related complications. There were three cases of non-union and two cases of interlocking screw loosening. Lateral decubitus position obviates the need for fracture table, making it easier to establish an entry point for an intramedullary device. Closed femoral intramedullary nailing in lateral decubitus position with the aid of intraoperative skeletal traction is safe and an effective technique with a low incidence of complications compared to the use of fracture table.

Keywords

Femur fracture Intramedullary nailing Lateral decubitus position 

Notes

Conflict of interest

None.

References

  1. 1.
    McFerran MA, Johnson KD (1992) Intramedullary nailing of acute femoral shaft fractures without a fracture table: technique of using a femoral distractor. Orthop Trauma 6:271–278Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Brumback RJ, Ellison TS, Molligan H et al (1992) Pudendal nerve palsy complicating intramedullary nailing of the femur. J Bone Joint Surg Am 74:1450–1455PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Winquist RA, Hansen ST Jr, Clawson DK (1984) Closed intramedullary nailing of femoral fractures. A report of five hundred and twenty cases. J Bone Joint Surg Am 66:529–539PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Wolinsky P, Tejwani N, Richmond JH et al (2002) Controversies in intramedullary nailing of femoral shaft fractures. Instr Course Lect 51:291–303PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Callanan I, Choudhry V, Smith H (1994) Perineal sloughing as a result of pressure necrosis from the traction post during prolonged bilateral femoral nailing. Injury 25:472PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Anglen J, Banovetz J (1994) Compartment syndrome in the well leg resulting from fracture-table positioning. Clin Orthop Relat Res 301:239–242PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Karpos PA, McFerran MA, Johnson KD (1995) Intramedullary nailing of acute femoral shaft fractures using manual traction without a fracture table. J Orthop Traum 9:57–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Stephen DJ, Kreder HJ, Schemitsch EH et al (2002) Femoral intramedullary nailing: comparison of fracture-table and manual traction. A prospective, randomized study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 84:1514–1521PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Wolinsky PR, McCarty EC, Shyr Y, Johnson KD (1998) Length of operative procedures: reamed femoral intramedullary nailing performed with and without a fracture table. J Orthop Trauma 12:485–495PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Iagulli ND, Mallory TH, Berend KR et al (2006) A simple and accurate method for determining leg length in primary total hip arthroplasty. Am J Orthop 35:455–457PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Liu HT, Wang IC, Yu CM et al (2005) Closed femoral nailing in lateral decubitus position without a fracture table: a preliminary report of fifteen patients. Chang Gung Med J 28:629–635PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Dora C, Leunig M, Beck M, Rothenfluh D, Ganz R (2001) Entry point soft tissue damage in antegrade femoral nailing: a cadaver study. J Orthop Trauma 15:488–493PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    McConnell T, Tornetta P III, Benson E, Manuel J (2003) Gluteus medius tendon injury during reaming for gamma nail. Clin Orthop Relat Res 407:199–202PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Miller SD, Burkart B, Damson E, Shrive N, Bray RC (1993) The effect of the entry hole for an intramedullary nail on the strength of the proximal femur. J Bone Joint Surg Br 75:202–206PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ostrum RF, Marcantonio A, Marburger R (2005) A critical analysis of the eccentric starting point for trochanteric intramedullary femoral nailing. J Orthop Trauma 19:681–686PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ozsoy MH, Basarir K, Bayramoglu A et al (2007) Risk of superior gluteal nerve and gluteus medius muscle injury during femoral nail insertion. J Bone Joint Surg Am 89:829–834PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Haddad FS, Cobiella CE, Wilson L (1998) Inferior epigastric artery avulsion: a fracture table complication. J Orthop Trauma 12:587–588PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Tucker MC, Schwappach JR, Leighton RK, Coupe K, Ricci WM (2007) Results of femoral intramedullary nailing in patients who are obese versus those who are not obese: a prospective multicenter comparison study. J Orthop Trauma 21:523–529PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Carr JB, Williams D, Richards M. (2009) Lateral decubitus positioning for intramedullary nailing of the femur without the use of a fracture table. Orthopedics. doi:  10.3928/01477447-20090818-05

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kap Jung Kim
    • 1
  • Won-Sik Choy
    • 1
  • Sang Ki Lee
    • 1
  • Hyun Jong Park
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Orthopedic SurgeryEulji University College of MedicineSeo-gu, DaejeonRepublic of Korea

Personalised recommendations