Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Variations in the position of the aorta and vertebral safe zones in supine, prone, and lateral decubitus for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Spine Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Analyze the modifications in the “safe zones” of T4–L4 vertebral bodies relative to aorta according to patient positioning, as well as in the relationship between the aorta and the vertebrae.

Methods

Patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis who underwent surgical treatment during 2017 were included. Preoperative whole spine MRI in supine, prone, and LD positions was performed. The safe zone right (SZR) was defined as the angle formed between X-axis (0º) and a line connecting the origin and the edge of the aorta, and the safe zone left (SZL) was the angle between the edge of the aorta to 180º (X-axis).

Results

A total of 21 patients were studied, median age was 15.2 years, and 71.4% were female. The mean SZR lied from 0°–86.1º at T4 to 0°–76.9º at L4 in supine, from 0°–84.05º at T4 to 0º–78.5º at L4 in prone, and from 0° to 91.75º at T4 to 0°–80.4º at L4 in LD. While the mean SZL was located from 155.4º–180º at T4 to 107.9º–180º at L4 in supine, from 134°–180° at T4 to 103.9°–180° at L4 in prone, and from 143.8º–180º at T4 to 106º–180º at L4 in LD. Statistically significant differences were found almost at all levels when comparing supine versus prone and LD.

Conclusions

Patient positioning during spinal surgery significantly modifies T4–L4 vertebral safe zones relative to aorta. These variations should be taken into account when analyzing an MRI performed in supine if the patient is undergoing surgery in a different position, to avoid vascular-related injuries.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Fantini GA, Pappou IP, Girardi FP, Sandhu HS, Cammisa FP Jr (2007) Major vascular injury during anterior lumbar spinal surgery: incidence, risk factors, and management. Spine 32(24):2751–2758. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e31815a996e

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Lavigne F, Mascard E, Laurian C, Dubousset J, Wicart P (2009) Delayed-iatrogenic injury of the thoracic aorta by an anterior spinal instrumentation. Eur Spine J Official Publicat Eur Spine Soc Eur Spinal Deform Soc, Eur Sect Cerv Spine Res Soc 18(2):265–268. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-009-0974-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Uribe JS, Deukmedjian AR (2015) Visceral, vascular, and wound complications following over 13,000 lateral interbody fusions: a survey study and literature review. Eur Spine J 24(3):386–396

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Szolar DH, Preidler KW, Steiner H, Riepl T, Flaschka G, Stiskal M, Norman D (1996) Vascular complications in lumbar disk surgery: report of four cases. Neuroradiology 38(6):521–525

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Hicks JM, Singla A, Shen FH, Arlet V (2010) Complications of pedicle screw fixation in scoliosis surgery: a systematic review. Spine 35(11):E465–E470

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Moore KL (2010) The thoracic and abdominal aorta. In: Moore KL (ed) Clinacally Oriented Anatomy, 6thd edn. Williams & Wilkins, Baltimor, pp 167–313

    Google Scholar 

  7. Sucato DJ, Duchene C (2003) The position of the aorta relative to the spine: a comparison of patients with and without idiopathic scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 85(8):1461–1469

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Milbrandt TA, Sucato DJ (2007) The position of the aorta relative to the spine in patients with left thoracic scoliosis: a comparison with normal patients. Spine 32(12):E348–E353

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Chiu CK, Lee KJ, Chung WH, Chandren JR, Chan C, Kwan MK (2019) Does the Severity of the curve in Lenke 1 and 2 adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients affect the distance and position of the aorta from vertebra? Spine 44(11):785–792. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000002945

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Smorgick Y, Millgram MA, Anekstein Y, Floman Y, Mirovsky Y (2005) Accuracy and safety of thoracic pedicle screw placement in spinal deformities. J Spin Disord Techniq 18(6):522–526

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Şarlak AY, Tosun B, Atmaca H, Sarisoy HT, Buluç L (2009) Evaluation of thoracic pedicle screw placement in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Eur Spine J 18(12):1892–1897

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Jiang H, Qiu X, Wang W, Zhu Z, Qian B, Guo J, Qiu Y (2012) The position of the aorta changes with altered body position in single right thoracic adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a magnetic resonance imaging study. Spine 37(17):E1054–E1061

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Huitema GC, Cornips EM, Castelijns MH et al (2007) The position of the aorta relative to the spine: is it mobile or not? Spine 32(12):1259–1264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Plataniotis N, Evangelopoulos DS, Katzouraki G, Pneumaticos S (2019) The effect of patient positioning on the relative position of the aorta to the thoracic spine. Euro Spine J Official Publicat Euro Spine Soc Euro Spinal Deform Soc Euro Sect Cerv Spine Res Soc 28(3):477–483. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-018-5812-9

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Sucato DJ, Kassab F, Dempsey M (2004) Analysis of screw placement relative to the aorta and spinal canal following anterior instrumentation for thoracic idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 29(5):554–559. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.brs.0000106495.91477.92

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Takeshita K, Maruyama T, Ono T, Ogihara S, Chikuda H, Shoda N, Nakamura K (2010) New parameters to represent the position of the aorta relative to the spine for pedicle screw placement. Eur Spine J 19(5):815–820

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Qiao J, Zhu F, Xu L, Zhu Z, Qian B, Liu Z, Qiu Y (2012) Comparison of the aorta impingement risks between thoracolumbar/lumbar curves with different convexities in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a computed tomography study. Eur Spine J 21(10):2043–2049

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Liu J, Shen J, Zhang J, Li S, Zhao H, Qiu G, Wang Y (2012) The position of the aorta relative to the spine for pedicle screw placement in the correction of idiopathic scoliosis. Clinical Spine Surgery 25(4):E103–E107

    Google Scholar 

  19. Bekki H, Harimaya K, Matsumoto Y, Hayashida M, Okada S, Doi T, Iwamoto Y (2016) The position of the aorta relative to the vertebrae in patients with lenke type 1 adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 41(7):585–590

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Egea-Gámez RM, Wilson-MacDonald J, Murray D, González-Díaz R (2020) Definition of safe zone in vertebral body in relation to anterior instrumentation. Spine Deform. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43390-020-00100-w

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Lenke LG, Betz RR, Harms J et al (2001) Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a new classification to determine extent of spinal arthrodesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 83:1169–1181

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Bullmann V, Fallenberg EM, Meier N, Fischbach R, Lerner T, Schulte TL, Liljenqvist UR (2006) The position of the aorta relative to the spine before and after anterior instrumentation in right thoracic scoliosis. Spine 31(15):1706–1713

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Vaccaro AR, Kepler CK, Rihn JA, Suzuki H, Ratliff JK, Harrop JS, Albert TJ (2012) Anatomical relationships of the anterior blood vessels to the lower lumbar intervertebral discs. J Bone Joint Surg 94(12):1088–1094

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Takeshita K, Maruyama T, Nakao Y, Ono T, Taniguchi Y, Chikuda H, Nakamura K (2010) Aorta movement in patients with scoliosis after posterior surgery. Spine 35(26):E1571–E1576

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Chan C, Kwan MK (2018) Zonal differences in risk and pattern of pedicle screw perforations in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS): a computerized tomography (CT) review of 1986 screws. Eur Spine J Official Publicat Euro Spine Soc Euro Spinal Deform Soc Euro Sect Cerv Spine Res Soc 27(2):340–349. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-017-5350-x

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rosa M. Egea-Gámez.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

I and the other authors have NO financial relationship(s) with a commercial interest producing healthcare goods or services.

Ethical approval

This study was carried out in accordance with the World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki (JBJS 79A:1089-98, 1997).

Informed consent

Patients confidentiality was protected according to the U.S. Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA).

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Egea-Gámez, R.M., Galán-Olleros, M., Rodríguez del Real, T. et al. Variations in the position of the aorta and vertebral safe zones in supine, prone, and lateral decubitus for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Eur Spine J 30, 1950–1958 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-021-06813-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-021-06813-4

Keywords

Navigation