Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Validity of the global alignment proportion (GAP) score in predicting mechanical complications after adult spinal deformity surgery in elderly patients

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Spine Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

This study aimed to validate the usefulness of the global alignment proportion (GAP) score to predict postoperative mechanical failure in the elderly (mean age, 70.5 years) individuals with severe sagittal imbalance.

Methods

A total of 84 patients were enrolled: mechanical complications (MC), minor mechanical complications (mMC), proximal junctional failure (PJF), and revision surgery occurred in 61% (51/84), 58% (49/84), 44% (37/84), and 13% (11/84) of the patients, respectively. The GAP score was calculated using the X-ray obtained in the early postoperative period. The validity of the GAP score’s predictive ability was evaluated by calculating the area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristics curve. Univariate logistic regression analysis and Cochran–Armitage test of trend were performed to determine the association between mechanical complications and GAP score.

Results

The discriminatory power of GAP score to predict MC, mMC, and PJF was “moderately accurate,” with an AUC of 0.839 (confidence interval [CI] 0.755–0.824, p < 0.001), 0.836 (CI 0.749–0.923, p < 0.001), and 0.702 (CI 0.588–0.851, p < 0.001), respectively. The GAP score showed a statistically significant association with MC, mMC, and PJF in univariate logistic regression analysis and Cochran–Armitage test for trend. However, it was not significantly associated with revision surgery.

Conclusion

This study showed promising results regarding the GAP score’s predictive power for MC, mMC, and PJF in the elderly population with degenerative kyphoscoliosis. Using the GAP score, we can determine the patient’s specific correction goal preoperatively to prevent mechanical failure based on individual patient’s characteristics such as pelvic incidence.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cerpa M, Sardar Z, Lenke L (2020) Revision surgery in proximal junctional kyphosis. Eur Spine J 29:78–85

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Drazin D, Shirzadi A, Rosner J, Eboli P, Safee M, Baron EM, Liu JC, Acosta FL Jr (2011) Complications and outcomes after spinal deformity surgery in the elderly: review of the existing literature and future directions. Neurosurg Focus 31(4):E3. https://doi.org/10.3171/2011.7.focus11145

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Yoshida G, Hasegawa T, Yamato Y, Kobayashi S, Shin O, Banno T, Mihara Y, Arima H, Ushirozako H, Yasuda T, Togawa D, Matsuyama Y (2019) Minimum clinically important differences in oswestry disability index domains and their impact on adult spinal deformity surgery. Asian Spine J 13 (1):35–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Sciubba DM, Yurter A, Smith JS, Kelly MP, Scheer JK, Goodwin CR, Lafage V, Hart RA, Bess S, Kebaish K, Schwab F, Shaffrey CI, Ames CP (2015) A comprehensive review of complication rates after surgery for adult deformity: a reference for informed consent. Spine Deform 3(6):575–594. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jspd.2015.04.005

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Thomas K, Wong KH, Steelman SC, Rodriguez A (2019) Surgical risk assessment and prevention in elderly spinal deformity patients. Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil 10:2151459319851681. https://doi.org/10.1177/2151459319851681

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Zimmerman RM, Mohamed AS, Skolasky RL, Robinson MD, Kebaish KM (2010) Functional outcomes and complications after primary spinal surgery for scoliosis in adults aged forty years or older: a prospective study with minimum two-year follow-up. Spine 35(20):1861–1866

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Koike Y, Kotani Y, Terao H, Iwasaki N (2020) Risk factor analysis of proximal junctional kyphosis after surgical treatment of adult spinal deformity with oblique lateral interbody fusion. Asian Spine J. https://doi.org/10.31616/asj.2019.0341

  8. Decker S, Lafage R, Krettek C, Hart R, Ames C, Smith JS, Burton D, Klineberg E, Bess S, Schwab FJ, Lafage V (2020) Is sacral extension a risk factor for early proximal junctional kyphosis in adult spinal deformity surgery? Asian Spine J 14 (2):212–219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Kim YJ, Bridwell KH, Lenke LG, Glattes CR, Rhim S, Cheh G (2008) Proximal junctional kyphosis in adult spinal deformity after segmental posterior spinal instrumentation and fusion: minimum five-year follow-up. Spine 33(20):2179–2184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Hart R, McCarthy I, O’brien M, Bess S, Line B, Adjei OB, Burton D, Gupta M, Ames C, Deviren V (2013) Identification of decision criteria for revision surgery among patients with proximal junctional failure after surgical treatment of spinal deformity. Spine 38(19):E1223–E1227

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Yilgor C, Sogunmez N, Boissiere L, Yavuz Y, Obeid I, Kleinstuck F, Perez-Grueso FJS, Acaroglu E, Haddad S, Mannion AF, Pellise F, Alanay A (2017) Global alignment and proportion (gap) score: development and validation of a new method of analyzing spinopelvic alignment to predict mechanical complications after adult spinal deformity surgery. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 99(19):1661–1672. https://doi.org/10.2106/jbjs.16.01594

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Jacobs E, van Royen BJ, van Kuijk SM, Merk JM, Stadhouder A, van Rhijn LW, Willems PC (2019) Prediction of mechanical complications in adult spinal deformity surgery—the GAP score versus the Schwab classification. Spine J 19(5):781–788

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Bari TJ, Ohrt-Nissen S, Hansen LV, Dahl B, Gehrchen M (2019) Ability of the global alignment and proportion score to predict mechanical failure following adult spinal deformity surgery-validation in 149 patients with two-year follow-up. Spine Deform 7(2):331–337. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jspd.2018.08.002

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Kwan KYH, Lenke LG, Shaffrey CI, Carreon LY, Dahl BT, Fehlings MG, Ames CP, Boachie-Adjei O, Dekutoski MB, Kebaish KM (2020) Are Higher Global Alignment and Proportion Scores Associated With Increased Risks of Mechanical Complications after Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery? An External Validation. Clin Orthop Relat Res 479:312–320. https://doi.org/10.1097/corr.0000000000001521

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Glattes RC, Bridwell KH, Lenke LG, Kim YJ, Rinella A, Edwards C 2nd (2005) Proximal junctional kyphosis in adult spinal deformity following long instrumented posterior spinal fusion: incidence, outcomes, and risk factor analysis. Spine 30(14):1643–1649. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.brs.0000169451.76359.49

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Rabin R, de Charro F (2001) EQ-5D: a measure of health status from the EuroQol Group. Ann Med 33(5):337–343. https://doi.org/10.3109/07853890109002087

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Moon HJ, Bridwell KH, Theologis AA, Kelly MP, Lertudomphonwanit T, Kim HJ, Lenke LG, Gupta MC (2019) Thoracolumbar junction orientation: its impact on thoracic kyphosis and sagittal alignment in both asymptomatic volunteers and symptomatic patients. Eur Spine J 28(9):1937–1947

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Moon HJ, Bridwell KH, Theologis AA, Kelly MP, Lertudomphonwanit T, Lenke LG, Gupta MC (2020) Thoracolumbar junction orientation: a novel guide for sagittal correction and proximal junctional kyphosis prediction in adult spinal deformity patients. Neurosurgery 88:55–62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Lau D, Clark AJ, Scheer JK, Daubs MD, Coe JD, Paonessa KJ, LaGrone MO, Kasten MD, Amaral RA, Trobisch PD (2014) Proximal junctional kyphosis and failure after spinal deformity surgery: a systematic review of the literature as a background to classification development. Spine 39(25):2093–2102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Diebo BG, Henry J, Lafage V, Berjano P (2015) Sagittal deformities of the spine: factors influencing the outcomes and complications. Eur Spine J 24(1):3–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Yagi M, King AB, Boachie-Adjei O (2012) Incidence, risk factors, and natural course of proximal junctional kyphosis: surgical outcomes review of adult idiopathic scoliosis. Minimum 5 years of follow-up. Spine 37(17):1479–1489

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Spine Center and Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea

    Dae-Woong Ham, Ho-Joong Kim, Jae Heouk Choi, Jiwon Park & Jin S. Yeom

  2. Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, 166 Gumiro Bundang-gu, Seongnam, 463-707, Republic of Korea

    Ho-Joong Kim

  3. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea

    Junpyo Lee

Authors
  1. Dae-Woong Ham
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ho-Joong Kim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Jae Heouk Choi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Jiwon Park
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Junpyo Lee
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Jin S. Yeom
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ho-Joong Kim.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ham, DW., Kim, HJ., Choi, J.H. et al. Validity of the global alignment proportion (GAP) score in predicting mechanical complications after adult spinal deformity surgery in elderly patients. Eur Spine J 30, 1190–1198 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-021-06734-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-021-06734-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation