Cement augmentation of odontoid peg fractures: the effect of cement volume and distribution on construct stiffness
The cement augmentation of a conventional anterior screw fixation in type II odontoid process fractures for elderly patients significantly increased stiffness and load to failure under anterior–posterior load in comparison with non-augmented fixation. The amount and quality of bone cement are usually taken ad hoc in clinical practise. In this study, we wanted to clarify the role of bone cement amount and its quality to the stiffness of odontoid and vertebrae body junction.
Finite-element method was used to achieve different scenarios of cement augmentation. For all models, an initial stiffness was calculated. Model (1) the intact vertebrae were virtually potted into a polymethylmethacrylate base via the posterior vertebral arches. A V-shaped punch was used for loading the odontoid in an anterior–posterior direction. (2) The odontoid fracture type IIa (Anderson–D’Alonzo classification) was achieved by virtual transverse osteotomy. Anterior screw fixation was virtually performed by putting self-drilling titanium alloy 3.5 mm diameter anterior cannulated lag screw with a 12 mm thread into the inspected vertebrae. A V-shaped punch was used for loading the odontoid in an anterior–posterior direction. The vertebrae body was assumed to be non-cemented and cemented with different volume.
The mean cement volume was lowest for body base filling with 0.47 ± 0.03 ml. The standard body filling corresponds to 0.95 ± 0.15 ml. The largest volume corresponds to 1.62 ± 0.12 ml in the presence of cement leakage. The initial stiffness of the intact C2 vertebrae was taken as the reference value. The mean initial stiffness for non-porous cement (E = 3000 MPa) increased linearly (R2 = 0.98). The lowest stiffness (123.3 ± 5.8 N/mm) was measured in the intact C2 vertebrae. However, the highest stiffness (165.2 ± 5.2 N/mm) was measured when cement leakage out of the odontoid peg occurred. The mean initial stiffness of the base-only cemented group was 147.2 ± 8.4 N/mm compared with 157.9 ± 6.6 N/mm for the base and body cemented group. This difference was statistically significant (p < 0.0061). The mean initial stiffness for porous cement (E = 500 MPa) remains constant. Therefore, there is no difference between cemented and non-cemented junction. This difference was not statistically significant (p < 0.18).
The present study showed that the low porous cement was able to significantly influence the stiffness of the augmented odontoid screw fixation in vitro, although further in vivo clinical studies should be undertaken. Our results suggest that only a small amount of non-porous cement is needed to restore stiffness at least to its pre-fracture level and this can be achieved with the injection of 0.7–1.2 ml of cement.
KeywordsFracture Spine Finite element Bone cement Odontoid
This work was supported by the Charles University Grant Agency (GAUK) no. 816016.
The manuscript has not previously been published in print or electronic form and is not under consideration by another publication.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
Authors declare that there is no ethical problem or conflict of interest.
- 9.Sun HB, Jing XS, Liu YZ, Qi M, Wang XK, Hai Y (2018) The optimal volume fraction in percutaneous vertebroplasty evaluated by pain relief, cement dispersion, and cement leakage: a prospective cohort study of 130 patients with painful osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture in the thoracolumbar vertebra. World Neurosurg 114:e677–e688CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 10.Yang EZ, Xu JG, Huang GZ, Xiao WZ, Liu XK, Zeng BF et al (2016) Percutaneous vertebroplasty versus conservative treatment in aged patients with acute osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures: a prospective randomized controlled clinical study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 41(8):653–660CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 17.Pauchard Y, Fitze T, Browarnik D, Eskandari A, Enns-Bray W, Pálsson H, Sigurdsson S, Ferguson Stephen J, Harris Tamara B, Gudnason V, Helgason B (2016) Interactive graph-cut segmentation for fast creation of finite element models from clinical CT data for hip fracture prediction. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Eng 19(16):1693–1703CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 25.Belkoff SM, Molloy S (2003) Temperature measurement during polymerization of polymethylmethacrylate cement used for vertebroplasty. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 28(14):1555–1559Google Scholar
- 27.Kurutza M, Vargab P, Jakab G (2019) Prophylactic vertebroplasty versus kyphoplasty in osteoporosis: A comprehensive biomechanical matched-pair study by in vitro compressive testing. Med Eng Phys 65:45–46Google Scholar