Comparison of percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic lumbar discectomy through unilateral versus bilateral approach for L3/4 or L4/5 lumbar disc herniation with bilateral symptoms: technical notes and a prospective randomized study
In this study, the authors described the technical notes of percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic lumbar discectomy (PTELD) through unilateral approach and compared PTELD through unilateral versus bilateral approach for L3/4 or L4/5 lumbar disc herniation with bilateral symptoms.
A prospective randomized clinical study was performed from June 2014 to October 2016. A total of 71 patients with lumbar disc herniation (L3/4 or L4/5) and bilateral symptoms were divided randomly into Unilateral-Approach group (n = 35) or Bilateral-Approach group (n = 36). Operation time, blood loss, intraoperative fluoroscopy and recurrences were recorded and analyzed statistically. Visual Analogue Scale scores, Oswestry Disability Index and the MacNab standard were used to analyze the clinical outcomes of the two groups.
The baseline data of the two groups were statistically similar. There was significant postoperative improvement in VAS and ODI scores in both the groups, and clinical outcomes are comparable according to the MacNab standard. However, VAS score of back pain at 1 day after surgery in Unilateral-Approach group was significantly lower than that in Bilateral-Approach group (P < 0.05). Moreover, operation time and cumulative time of intraoperative fluoroscopy of Unilateral-Approach group were significantly shorter than that of Bilateral-Approach group (P < 0.05).
For L3/4 or L4/5 LDH with bilateral symptoms, PTELD through unilateral approach is effective, with advantage of shorter operation time, shorter cumulative time of intraoperative fluoroscopy and milder postoperative short-term back pain compared to bilateral approach.
KeywordsPercutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy Unilateral transforaminal approach Lumbar disc herniation Bilateral symptoms
This study was supported by Shandong Science and Technology Development Plan on Medicine and Hygiene in China (Grant Number: 2017WS519). This study was also supported by Jining Science and Technology Boosting New and Old Energy Conversion Plan in China (Grant Number: 2017SMNS010).
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- 2.Tsou PM, Alan Yeung C, Yeung AT (2004) Posterolateral transforaminal selective endoscopic discectomy and thermal annuloplasty for chronic lumbar discogenic pain: a minimal access visualized intradiscal surgical procedure. Spine J 4(5):564–573. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2004.01.014 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 7.Choi G, Lee SH, Lokhande P, Kong BJ, Shim CS, Jung B, Kim JS (2008) Percutaneous endoscopic approach for highly migrated intracanal disc herniations by foraminoplastic technique using rigid working channel endoscope. Spine 33(15):E508–515. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e31817bfa1a CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 12.Choi SH, Adsul NM, Kim HS, Kim KJ, Kim JH, Chung SK, Choi JH, Jang JS, Jang IT, Oh SH (2018) Percutaneous endoscopic interlaminar unilateral ventral dural approach for symptomatic bilateral L5-S1 herniated nucleus pulposus: technical note. J Neurol Surg Part A Cent Eur Neurosurg 79(6):518–523. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0038-1639505 CrossRefGoogle Scholar