Restoring the ideal Roussouly sagittal profile in adult scoliosis surgery decreases the risk of mechanical complications
There are still no data proving whether restoring the ideal sagittal profile (according to Roussouly classification) in adult scoliosis (AS) patients leads to any additional benefit, especially regarding mechanical complications.
Retrospective analysis of operated AS patients recorded in a prospective multicenter database. Demographic and radiographic (preoperative and 6-week postoperative) data were analyzed. Patients with and without mechanical complications were compared looking especially at the surgical restoration of the ideal (based on Pelvic Incidence) sagittal profile. Univariate and multivariate analysis was performed to identify causes of mechanical complications at 2-year minimum follow-up.
Ninty-six AS patients were analyzed. Thirty-nine patients suffered a mechanical complication (18 PJK, 11 pseudoarthrosis, 10 screw pull-out), and 57 patients had no mechanical complications. Postoperatively, 72% of patients not matching the ideal Roussouly-type suffered mechanical complications compared to 15% of matched patients (P < 0.001). Univariate analysis showed that older patients 64.9 ± 13 versus 40.7 ± 15.6 years (P < 0.001), higher postoperative Global Tilt (27° vs. 14.7°) and Pelvic Tilt (25° vs. 16°) (P < 0.001), upper instrumented vertebra at the thoracolumbar junction (62% vs. 21%) (P < 0.001), fixation to the Iliac (76% vs. 6%) (P < 0.001), and postoperative Roussouly-type mismatch (72% vs. 15%) (P < 0.001) significantly increased the rate of mechanical complications. Multivariate logistic regression analysis selected: postoperative Roussouly-type mismatch (OR = 41.9; 95%CI = 5.5–315.7; P < 0.001), iliac instrumentation (OR = 19.4; 95%CI = 2.6–142.5; P = 0.004), and age (OR = 1.1; 95%CI = 1.02–1.16; P = 0.004), as the most important variables.
Adult scoliosis surgery should restore the ideal Roussouly sagittal profile to decrease the rate of mechanical complications, especially in patients older than 65, instrumented to the pelvis.
KeywordsAdult scoliosis Roussouly classification Sagittal profiles Mechanical complications Adult deformity surgery
Johnson and Johnson DePuy-Synthes Spine and Medtronic research grant were received in partial support of this work.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
This study has institutional review board (IRB) approval/research ethics committee approval.
- 7.Dubousset J (1994) Three-dimensional analysis of the scoliotic deformity. In: Weinstein SL (ed) The pediatric spine: principles and practice. Raven Press Ltd, New York, pp 479–496Google Scholar
- 12.Takemoto M, Boissière L, Vital J-M et al (2017) Are sagittal spinopelvic radiographic parameters significantly associated with quality of life of adult spinal deformity patients? Multivariate linear regression analyses for pre-operative and short-term post-operative health-related quality of life. Eur Spine J 26(8):2176–2186. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-016-4872-y CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 15.Yilgor C, Sogunmez N, Yavuz Y et al (2017) Relative lumbar lordosis and lordosis distribution index: individualized pelvic incidence–based proportional parameters that quantify lumbar lordosis more precisely than the concept of pelvic incidence minus lumbar lordosis. Neurosurg Focus 43:E5–E9. https://doi.org/10.3171/2017.8.FOCUS17498 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 27.Cecchinato R, Redaelli A, Martini C et al (2017) Long fusions to S1 with or without pelvic fixation can induce relevant acute variations in pelvic incidence: a retrospective cohort study of adult spine deformity surgery. Eur Spine J 26:436–441. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-017-5154-z CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar