Curve progression in de novo degenerative lumbar scoliosis combined with degenerative segment disease after short-segment fusion
To validate the reliability of Berjano and Lamartina classification system of surgical planning in cases of de novo degenerative lumbar scoliosis (DNDLS) combined with degenerative segment disease and identify factors contributing to curve progression.
Fifty-four cases of type I or II DNDLS were retrospectively reviewed. Health-related quality of life (HRQOL) was assessed using visual analogue scale (VAS) scores for the back and leg, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) scores. Radiographic parameters were obtained from X-rays. Improvements in HRQOL were confirmed by a paired t test. Changes in radiographic parameters were confirmed by paired t test and Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Clinical relevance between spinopelvic parameters and Cobb angle progression was analyzed by Spearman correlation coefficient.
The mean follow-up period was 36.8 ± 14.8 months. The scores taken preoperatively versus at the last follow-up were as follows: mean VAS back score, 4.5 ± 2.4 versus 1.8 ± 1.5 (p < 0.01); and mean VAS leg score, 5.2 ± 2.5 versus 1.7 ± 2.1 (p < 0.01). The ODI score improved from 25.3 ± 8.9% to 10.1 ± 5.4% (p < 0.01), whereas the mean JOA score improved from 14.3 ± 4.9 to 21.0 ± 3.7 (p < 0.01). The mean Cobb angle decreased from 17.1° ± 7.4° to 9.4° ± 4.5° postoperatively but worsened to 14.1° ± 6.4° at the last follow-up with a mean progression of 2.1° per year. Cobb angle correction was lost at a mean 2.1° ± 3.3° per year with correlation to T1 pelvic angle and sagittal vertical axis preoperatively.
Selective decompression and short-segment fusion were effective for treating type I and II cases DNDLS. The Cobb angle increased relative to preoperative sagittal spine alignment.
KeywordsDe novo degenerative lumbar scoliosis Degenerative segment disease Spinopelvic parameter Cobb angle Short fusion Curve progression
We thank the support from the Editage in language editing.
This study was not funded.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. For this type of study, formal consent was not required.
- 4.Transfeldt EE, Topp R, Mehbod AA et al (2010) Surgical outcomes of decompression, decompression with limited fusion, and decompression with full curve fusion for degenerative scoliosis with radiculopathy. Spine 35(20):1872–1875. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181ce63a2 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 14.Lee CH, Chung CK, Sohn MJ et al (2017) Short limited fusion versus long fusion with deformity correction for spinal stenosis with balanced de novo degenerative lumbar scoliosis: a meta-analysis of direct comparative studies. Spine. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000002306 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 16.Zimmerman RM, Mohamed AS, Skolasky RL et al (2010) Functional outcomes and complications after primary spinal surgery for scoliosis in adults aged forty years or older: a prospective study with minimum two-year follow-up. Spine. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181e57827 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 19.Cecchinato R, Redaelli A, Martini C et al (2017) Long fusions to S1 with or without pelvic fixation can induce relevant acute variations in pelvic incidence: a retrospective cohort study of adult spine deformity surgery. Eur Spine J 26(Suppl 4):436–441. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-017-5154-z CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 23.Watanuki A, Yamada H, Tsutsui S et al (2012) Radiographic features and risk of curve progression of de-novo degenerative lumbar scoliosis in the elderly: a 15-year follow-up study in a community-based cohort. J Orthop Sci 17(5):526–531. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00776-012-0253-5 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 25.Protopsaltis T, Schwab F, Bronsard N et al (2014) TheT1 pelvic angle, a novel radiographic measure of global sagittal deformity, accounts for both spinal inclination and pelvic tilt and correlates with health-related quality of life. J Bone Joint Surg Am 96(19):1631–1640. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.M.01459 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar