Advertisement

Decreased tibial nerve movement in patients with failed back surgery syndrome and persistent leg pain

  • G. ShumEmail author
  • S. Cinnamond
  • M. Hutton
  • D. Chan
  • R. Chauhan
  • S. Bloxham
  • S. Choy
  • R. Cheung
  • S. Eldabe
  • A. Clarke
Original Article

Abstract

Purpose

To measure and compare the total and normalised tibial nerve movements during forward bending in patients with and without failed back surgery syndrome (FBSS) and persistent leg pain following anatomically successful lumbar decompression surgery and demonstrated no psychological stress. Nerve pathomechanics may contribute to FBSS with persistent leg pain following anatomically successful lumbar decompression surgery.

Methods

Tibial nerve movement during forward bending was measured in two groups of patients following anatomically successful lumbar decompression surgery. FBSS group (N = 37) consisted of patients with persistent leg pain following lumbar surgery, and non-FBSS (N = 37) were patients with no remaining leg pain following lumbar surgery. Total and normalised tibial nerve movement at the popliteal fossa was measured by a previously validated ultrasound imaging technique and compared between the two groups, and also between the painful and non-painful leg within the FBSS group.

Results

Both the mean total and normalised tibial nerve movement were significantly decreased in the FBSS group in both legs when compared to the non-FBSS group (P < 0.05). The total and normalised tibial nerve movements were also more restricted in the painful leg (P < 0.05) when compared to the non-painful side within the FBSS group.

Conclusion

This was the first study to quantify the decreased total and normalised tibial nerve mobility in FBSS patients with persistent leg pain when compared with non-FBSS patients following anatomically successful lumbar decompression surgery. Further research could investigate the efficacy of intervention, such as nerve mobilisation in this particular group of patients with failed back surgery syndrome and limited nerve mobility.

Graphic abstract

These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.

Keywords

Failed back surgery syndrome Neuropathic pain Sciatica Nerve movement Post-operative pain 

Notes

Funding

The Royal Devon and Exeter NHS Foundation Trust, United Kingdom (13/SW/0029 and 14/NW/0110).

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Supplementary material

586_2019_6056_MOESM1_ESM.pptx (380 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (PPTX 381 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Weir S, Samnaliev M, Kuo TC, Ni Choitir C, Tierney TS, Cumming D, Bruce J, Manca A, Taylor RS, Eldabe S (2017) The incidence and healthcare costs of persistent postoperative pain following lumbar spine surgery in the UK: a cohort study using the Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD) and Hospital Episode Statistics (HES). BMJ Open 7(9):e017585.  https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017585 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Suthar P, Patel R, Mehta C, Patel N (2015) MRI evaluation of lumbar disc degenerative disease. J Clin Diagn Res 9(4):TC04–TC09.  https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2015/11927.5761 Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Lurie JD, Birkmeyer NJ, Weinstein JN (2003) Rates of advanced spinal imaging and spine surgery. Spine 28(6):616–620.  https://doi.org/10.1097/01.BRS.0000049927.37696.DC Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Eldabe S, Kumar K, Buchser E, Taylor RS (2010) An analysis of the components of pain, function, and health-related quality of life in patients with failed back surgery syndrome treated with spinal cord stimulation or conventional medical management. Neuromodulation 13(3):201–209.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1525-1403.2009.00271.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Fokter SK, Yerby SA (2006) Patient-based outcomes for the operative treatment of degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis. Eur Spine J 15(11):1661–1669.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-005-0033-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Asch HL, Lewis PJ, Moreland DB, Egnatchik JG, Yu YJ, Clabeaux DE, Hyland AH (2002) Prospective multiple outcomes study of outpatient lumbar microdiscectomy: should 75 to 80% success rates be the norm? J Neurosurg 96(1 Suppl):34–44Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Dewing CB, Provencher MT, Riffenburgh RH, Kerr S, Manos RE (2008) The outcomes of lumbar microdiscectomy in a young, active population: correlation by herniation type and level. Spine 33(1):33–38.  https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e31815e3a42 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ellis RF, Hing WA (2008) Neural mobilization: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials with an analysis of therapeutic efficacy. J Man Manip Ther 16(1):8–22.  https://doi.org/10.1179/106698108790818594 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Millesi H, Zoch G, Rath T (1990) The gliding apparatus of peripheral nerve and its clinical significance. Ann Chir Main Memb Super 9(2):87–97Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Dilley A, Lynn B, Pang SJ (2005) Pressure and stretch mechanosensitivity of peripheral nerve fibres following local inflammation of the nerve trunk. Pain 117(3):462–472.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pain.2005.08.018 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Yayama T, Kobayashi S, Nakanishi Y, Uchida K, Kokubo Y, Miyazaki T, Takeno K, Awara K, Mwaka ES, Iwamoto Y, Baba H (2010) Effects of graded mechanical compression of rabbit sciatic nerve on nerve blood flow and electrophysiological properties. J Clin Neurosci 17(4):501–505.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocn.2009.07.110 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Shum GL, Attenborough AS, Marsden JF, Hough AD (2013) Tibial nerve excursion during lumbar spine and hip flexion measured with diagnostic ultrasound. Ultrasound Med Biol 39(5):784–790.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2012.11.023 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Dworkin RH, Turk DC, Farrar JT, Haythornthwaite JA, Jensen MP, Katz NP, Kerns RD, Stucki G, Allen RR, Bellamy N, Carr DB, Chandler J, Cowan P, Dionne R, Galer BS, Hertz S, Jadad AR, Kramer LD, Manning DC, Martin S, McCormick CG, McDermott MP, McGrath P, Quessy S, Rappaport BA, Robbins W, Robinson JP, Rothman M, Royal MA, Simon L, Stauffer JW, Stein W, Tollett J, Wernicke J, Witter J, Immpact (2005) Core outcome measures for chronic pain clinical trials: IMMPACT recommendations. Pain 113(1–2):9–19.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pain.2004.09.012 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Stratford PW, Binkley J, Solomon P, Gill C, Finch E (1994) Assessing change over time in patients with low back pain. Phys Ther 74(6):528–533CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Shum GL, Crosbie J, Lee RY (2005) Effect of low back pain on the kinematics and joint coordination of the lumbar spine and hip during sit-to-stand and stand-to-sit. Spine 30(17):1998–2004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hobby JL, Lutchman LN, Powell JM, Sharp DJ (2001) The distress and risk assessment method (DRAM). J Bone Joint Surg Br 83(1):19–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Rebain R, Baxter GD, McDonough S (2002) A systematic review of the passive straight leg raising test as a diagnostic aid for low back pain (1989 to 2000). Spine 27(17):E388–E395CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Coppieters MW, Hough AD, Dilley A (2009) Different nerve-gliding exercises induce different magnitudes of median nerve longitudinal excursion: an in vivo study using dynamic ultrasound imaging. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 39(3):164–171.  https://doi.org/10.2519/jospt.2009.2913 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Jensen MP, Turner LR, Turner JA, Romano JM (1996) The use of multiple-item scales for pain intensity measurement in chronic pain patients. Pain 67(1):35–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Smith SA, Massie JB, Chesnut R, Garfin SR (1993) Straight leg raising. Anatomical effects on the spinal nerve root without and with fusion. Spine 18(8):992–999CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Thomson S, Jacques L (2009) Demographic characteristics of patients with severe neuropathic pain secondary to failed back surgery syndrome. Pain Pract 9(3):206–215.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1533-2500.2009.00276.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Lemke A, Penzenstadler C, Ferguson J, Lidinsky D, Hopf R, Bradl M, Redl H, Wolbank S, Hausner T (2017) A novel experimental rat model of peripheral nerve scarring that reliably mimics post-surgical complications and recurring adhesions. Dis Model Mech 10(8):1015–1025.  https://doi.org/10.1242/dmm.028852 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Topp KS, Boyd BS (2012) Peripheral nerve: from the microscopic functional unit of the axon to the biomechanically loaded macroscopic structure. J Hand Ther 25(2):142–151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jht.2011.09.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Gilbert KK, Roger James C, Apte G, Brown C, Sizer PS, Brismee JM, Smith MP (2015) Effects of simulated neural mobilization on fluid movement in cadaveric peripheral nerve sections: implications for the treatment of neuropathic pain and dysfunction. J Man Manip Ther 23(4):219–225.  https://doi.org/10.1179/2042618614Y.0000000094 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Apeldoorn AT, Bosselaar H, Ostelo RW, Blom-Luberti T, van der Ploeg T, Fritz JM, de Vet HC, van Tulder MW (2012) Identification of patients with chronic low back pain who might benefit from additional psychological assessment. Clin J Pain 28(1):23–31.  https://doi.org/10.1097/AJP.0b013e31822019d0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Sport, Health and WellbeingPlymouth Marjon UniversityPlymouthUK
  2. 2.Exeter Spinal Unit, Princess Elizabeth Orthopaedic CentreRoyal Devon and Exeter NHS Foundation TrustExeterUK
  3. 3.Department of Rehabilitation SciencesThe Hong Kong Polytechnic UniversityKowloonHong Kong
  4. 4.Department of AnaesthesiaSouth Tees Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustMiddlesbroughUK

Personalised recommendations