Systematic review of diagnostic accuracy of patient history, clinical findings, and physical tests in the diagnosis of lumbar spinal stenosis
To update evidence of diagnostic potential for identification of lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) based on demographic and patient history, clinical findings, and physical tests, and report posttest probabilities associated with test findings.
An electronic search of PubMed, CINAHL and Embase was conducted combining terms related to low back pain, stenosis and diagnostic accuracy. Prospective or retrospective studies investigating diagnostic accuracy of LSS using patient history, clinical findings and/or physical tests were included. The risk of bias and applicability were assessed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS 2) tool. Diagnostic accuracy including sensitivities (SN), specificities (SP), likelihood ratios (+LR and −LR) and posttest probabilities (+PTP and −PTP) with 95% confidence intervals were summarized.
Nine studies were included (pooled n = 36,228 participants) investigating 49 different index tests (30 demographic and patient history and 19 clinical findings/physical tests). Of the nine studies included, only two exhibited a low risk of bias and seven exhibited good applicability according to QUADAS 2. The demographic and patient history measures (self-reported history questionnaire, no pain when seated, numbness of perineal region) and the clinical findings/physical tests (two-stage treadmill test, symptoms after a March test and abnormal Romberg test) highly improved positive posttest probability by > 25% to diagnose LSS.
Outside of one study that was able to completely rule out LSS with no functional neurological changes none of the stand-alone findings were strong enough to rule in or rule out LSS.
KeywordsAccuracy Diagnostic Low back pain Stenosis Systematic review
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.
- 4.De Villiers PD, Booysen EL (1976) Fibrous spinal stenosis. A report on 850 myelograms with a water-soluble contrast medium. Clin Orthop Relat Res 115:140–144Google Scholar
- 7.de Graaf I, Prak A, Bierma-Zeinstra S, Thomas S, Peul W, Koes B (2006) Diagnosis of lumbar spinal stenosis: a systematic review of the accuracy of diagnostic tests. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 31(10):1168–1176. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.brs.0000216463.32136.7b CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 8.de Schepper EI, Overdevest GM, Suri P, Peul WC, Oei EH, Koes BW, Bierma-Zeinstra SM, Luijsterburg PA (2013) Diagnosis of lumbar spinal stenosis: an updated systematic review of the accuracy of diagnostic tests. Spine 38(8):E469–E481. https://doi.org/10.1097/brs.0b013e31828935ac CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 10.Whiting PF, Rutjes AW, Westwood ME, Mallett S, Deeks JJ, Reitsma JB, Leeflang MM, Sterne JA, Bossuyt PM, Group Q (2011) QUADAS-2: a revised tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies. Ann Intern Med 155(8):529–536. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-155-8-201110180-00009 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 11.McInnes MDF, Moher D, Thombs BD, McGrath TA, Bossuyt PM, Clifford T, Cohen JF, Deeks JJ, Gatsonis C, Hooft L, Hunt HA, Hyde CJ, Korevaar DA, Leeflang MMG, Macaskill P, Reitsma JB, Rodin R, Rutjes AWS, Salameh JP, Stevens A, Takwoingi Y, Tonelli M, Weeks L, Whiting P, Willis BH (2018) Preferred reporting items for a systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies: the PRISMA-DTA statement. JAMA 319(4):388–396. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2017.19163 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 12.Shea BJ, Reeves BC, Wells G, Thuku M, Hamel C, Moran J, Moher D, Tugwell P, Welch V, Kristjansson E, Henry DA (2017) AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both. BMJ 358:j4008. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.j4008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 13.Bossuyt P, Leeflang M (2008) Chapter 6: developing criteria for including studies. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy version 04 [updated September 2008] The Cochrane CollaborationGoogle Scholar
- 14.Worster A, Carpenter C (2008) Incorporation bias in studies of diagnostic tests: how to avoid being biased about bias. Can J Emerg Med 10(2):174–175Google Scholar
- 15.Wayne J (2005) Mosby’s dicfionary of complementary & alternafive medicine. Mosby, St LouisGoogle Scholar
- 16.Harris P, Nagy S, Vardaxis N (2014) ) Mosby’s Dictionary of Medicine, Nursing and Health Professions-Australian & New Zealand Edition. Elsevier Health Sciences, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
- 18.Cook C, Hegedus EJ (2008) Orthopedic physical examination tests: an evidence-based approach. Prentice Hall, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- 19.Toolbox E-BM (2018) EBM calculators. https://ebm-tools.knowledgetranslation.net/calculator
- 20.Analysis wCT (2018) 2-way contingency table analysis. http://statpages.info/ctab/2x2.html
- 21.Calculation E (2018) Diagnostic post test probability of disease calculation. https://www.easycalculation.com/statistics/post-test-probability.php
- 22.Cook C, Brown C, Michael K, Isaacs R, Howes C, Richardson W, Roman M, Hegedus E (2011) The clinical value of a cluster of patient history and observational findings as a diagnostic support tool for lumbar spine stenosis. Physiother Res Int 16(3):170–178. https://doi.org/10.1002/pri.500 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 26.Kato K, Sekiguchi M, Yonemoto K, Kakuma T, Nikaido T, Watanabe K, Otani K, Yabuki S, Kikuchi S, Konno S (2015) Diagnostic accuracy of the Self-administered, Self-reported History Questionnaire for lumbar spinal stenosis patients in Japanese primary care settings: a multicenter cross-sectional study (DISTO-project). J Orthop Sci 20(5):805–810. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00776-015-0740-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 28.Konno S, Hayashino Y, Fukuhara S, Kikuchi S, Kaneda K, Seichi A, Chiba K, Satomi K, Nagata K, Kawai S (2007) Development of a clinical diagnosis support tool to identify patients with lumbar spinal stenosis. Eur Spine J 16(11):1951–1957. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-007-0402-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 31.Simel DL, Rennie D (2016) Low back pain, lumbar spinal stenosis. In: The rational clinical examination: evidence-based clinical diagnosis. McGraw-Hill Education, New York, NY,Google Scholar