Residence could influence the surgical outcome after corrective surgery in adult spinal deformity: comparison study between urban and rural area in Korea
Numerous factors affect the surgical outcomes in patients with adult spinal deformity (ASD). However, no study has examined the relationship between residence and physical factors and surgical outcomes in patients with ASD. Here, we analysed the impact of residence and physical factors on the post-operative outcomes of patients with ASD residing in urban (U) and rural (R) environments.
We retrospectively reviewed data from patients who had undergone ASD surgery with sacropelvic fixation at a single institution between June 2011 and May 2017 with a minimum 1 year follow-up. We divided the patients into two groups (U and R). Preoperative demographic data were reviewed, and radiographic parameters were measured preoperatively, immediately postoperatively, at 1, 3, and 6 months, and at the final follow-up. The L4 axial paraspinal muscles were measured preoperatively using magnetic resonance imaging.
There were 25 and 34 patients in the U and R groups, respectively. Both groups had similar preoperative demographic and radiological parameters. There were no differences between the groups in post-operative radiographic parameters, clinical outcomes, and complications, but proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK) was significantly higher in the R group. Additionally, muscle mass in the multifidus and erector spinae was lower in the R than in the U group.
Patient residence influenced PJK in patients with ASD. Mass reduction in the trunk extensor muscle is an important and existing risk factor for PJK. Surgeons should be aware of this information for preoperative counselling, informed consent, and post-operative education of patients with ASD.
KeywordsAdult spinal deformity Proximal junctional kyphosis Urban living Rural living Trunk extensor muscle
This work was supported by the World Class 300 Project (R&D) (S2482672) of the MOTIE, MSS (Korea).
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflicts of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- 1.Schwab F, Ungar B, Blondel B, Buchowski J, Coe J, Deinlein D, DeWald C, Mehdian H, Shaffrey C, Tribus C, Lafage V (2012) Scoliosis Research Society-Schwab adult spinal deformity classification: a validation study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 37(12):1077–1082. https://doi.org/10.1097/brs.0b013e31823e15e2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 3.Kim YJ, Lenke LG, Bridwell KH, Kim J, Cho SK, Cheh G, Yoon J (2007) Proximal junctional kyphosis in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis after 3 different types of posterior segmental spinal instrumentation and fusions: incidence and risk factor analysis of 410 cases. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 32(24):2731–2738. https://doi.org/10.1097/brs.0b013e31815a7ead CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 4.Kim YJ, Bridwell KH, Lenke LG, Glattes CR, Rhim S, Cheh G (2008) Proximal junctional kyphosis in adult spinal deformity after segmental posterior spinal instrumentation and fusion: minimum five-year follow-up. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 33(20):2179–2184. https://doi.org/10.1097/brs.0b013e31817c0428 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 8.Ha Y, Maruo K, Racine L, Schairer WW, Hu SS, Deviren V, Burch S, Tay B, Chou D, Mummaneni PV, Ames CP, Berven SH (2013) Proximal junctional kyphosis and clinical outcomes in adult spinal deformity surgery with fusion from the thoracic spine to the sacrum: a comparison of proximal and distal upper instrumented vertebrae. J Neurosurg Spine 19(3):360–369. https://doi.org/10.3171/2013.5.SPINE12737 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 11.Wang C, Xu W, He S, Gu S, Zhao Y, Zhang J, Zhu X, Li M (2010) Differences in postoperative quality of life between adolescent patients with idiopathic scoliosis residing in urban and rural environments. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 35(6):652–656. https://doi.org/10.1097/brs.0b013e3181b9fe3e CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 12.Misterska E, Glowacki M, Panek S, Ignys-O’Byrne A, Glowacki J, Ignys I, Krauss H, Piatek J (2012) Effects of living environment on the postoperative scoliosis research society-24 results in females with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Med Sci Monit 18(8):CR523–CR531CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 17.Kim JY, Ryu DS, Paik HK, Ahn SS, Kang MS, Kim KH, Park JY, Chin DK, Kim KS, Cho YE, Kuh SU (2016) Paraspinal muscle, facet joint, and disc problems: risk factors for adjacent segment degeneration after lumbar fusion. Spine J 16(7):867–875. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2016.03.010 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 21.Kim JS, Phan K, Cheung ZB, Lee N, Vargas L, Arvind V, Merrill RK, Gidumal S, Di Capua J, Overley S, Dowdell J, Cho SK (2019) Surgical, radiographic, and patient-related risk factors for proximal junctional kyphosis: a meta-analysis. Global Spine J 9(1):32–40. https://doi.org/10.1177/2192568218761362 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 23.Watanabe K, Michikawa T, Yonezawa I, Takaso M, Minami S, Soshi S, Tsuji T, Okada E, Abe K, Takahashi M, Asakura K, Nishiwaki Y, Matsumoto M (2017) Physical activities and lifestyle factors related to adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 99(4):284–294. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.16.00459 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 24.Ames CP, Scheer JK, Lafage V, Smith JS, Bess S, Berven SH, Mundis GM, Sethi RK, Deinlein DA, Coe JD, Hey LA, Daubs MD (2016) Adult spinal deformity: epidemiology, health impact, evaluation, and management. Spine Deform 4(4):310–322. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jspd.2015.12.009 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 27.Kobayashi T, Chiba H, Jimbo S, Senoo I, Shimizu M, Atsuta Y, Ito H, Sugisawa H, Sugawara T, Habaguchi T (2016) Clinical, physical, and radiographic analyses of lumbar degenerative kyphosis and spondylolisthesis among community-based cohort. Eur Spine J 25(8):2384–2389. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-016-4615-0 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 28.Le Huec JC, Richards J, Tsoupras A, Price R, Leglise A, Faundez AA (2018) The mechanism in junctional failure of thoraco-lumbar fusions. Part I: biomechanical analysis of mechanisms responsible of vertebral overstress and description of the cervical inclination angle (CIA). Eur Spine J 27:129–138. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-017-5425-8 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar