Advertisement

Reply to the letter to the editor of L. Russo et al. concerning “Relationship between sagittal spinal curves geometry and isokinetic trunk muscle strength in adults” by W. Elsayed, A. Farrag, Q. Muaidi, N. Almulhim (2018) Eur Spine J 27:2014–2022

  • Walaa Hamdy Elsayed
  • Ahmed Taha Farrag
  • Qassim Ibrahim Muaidi
  • Nora Ahmed Almulhim
Author's Reply

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Elsayed W, Farrag A, Muaidi Q, Almulhim N (2018) Relationship between sagittal spinal curves geometry and isokinetic trunk muscle strength in adults. Eur Spine J 27:2014–2022CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kleinerman RA (2006) Cancer risks following diagnostic and therapeutic radiation exposure in children. Pediatr Radiol 36(Suppl 2):121–125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ronckers CM, Land CE, Miller JS, Stovall M, Lonstein JE, Doody MM (2010) Cancer mortality among women frequently exposed to radiographic examinations for spinal disorders. Radiat Res 174:83–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Drerup B, Hierholzer E (1994) Back shape measurement using video rasterstereography and three-dimensional reconstruction of spinal shape. Clin Biomech 9:28–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hackenberg L, Hierholzer E, Potzl W, Gotze C, Liljenqvist U (2003) Rasterstereographic back shape analysis in idiopathic scoliosis after anterior correction and fusion. Clin Biomech 18:1–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Mohokum M, Mendoza S, Udo W, Sitter H, Paletta JR, Skwara A (2010) Reproducibility of rasterstereography for kyphotic and lordotic angles, trunk length, and trunk inclination: a reliability study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 35:1353–1358CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Frerich JM, Hertzler K, Knott P, Mardjetko S (2012) Comparison of radiographic and surface topography measurements in adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis. Open Orthop J 6:261–265CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Mangone M, Raimondi P, Paoloni M, Pellanera S, Di Michele A, Di Renzo S, Vanadia M, Dimaggio M, Murgia M, Santilli V (2013) Vertebral rotation in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis calculated by radiograph and back surface analysis-based methods: correlation between the Raimondi method and rasterstereography. Eur Spine J 22:367–371CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Schulein S, Mendoza S, Malzkorn R, Harms J, Skwara A (2013) Rasterstereographic evaluation of interobserver and intraobserver reliability in postsurgical adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients. J Spinal Disord Tech 26:E143–E149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Guidetti L, Bonavolonta V, Tito A, Reis VM, Gallotta MC, Baldari C (2013) Intra- and interday reliability of spine rasterstereography. Biomed Res Int 2013:745480CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Schroeder J, Reer R, Braumann KM (2015) Video raster stereography back shape reconstruction: a reliability study for sagittal, frontal, and transversal plane parameters. Eur Spine J 24:262–269CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    He JW, Yan ZH, Liu J, Yu ZK, Wang XY, Bai GH, Ye XJ, Zhang X (2009) Accuracy and repeatability of a new method for measuring scoliosis curvature. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 34:E323–E329CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Parent EC, Damaraju S, Hill DL, Lou E, Smetaniuk D (2010) Identifying the best surface topography parameters for detecting idiopathic scoliosis curve progression. Stud Health Technol Inform 158:78–82PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Walaa Hamdy Elsayed
    • 1
  • Ahmed Taha Farrag
    • 2
    • 3
  • Qassim Ibrahim Muaidi
    • 1
  • Nora Ahmed Almulhim
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Physical Therapy, College of Applied Medical SciencesImam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal UniversityDammamSaudi Arabia
  2. 2.Prince Sultan College of Health SciencesDhahranSaudi Arabia
  3. 3.Basic Science Department, Faculty of Physical TherapyCairo UniversityCairoEgypt

Personalised recommendations