Quasi-automatic 3D reconstruction of the full spine from low-dose biplanar X-rays based on statistical inferences and image analysis
To design a quasi-automated three-dimensional reconstruction method of the spine from biplanar X-rays as the daily used method in clinical routine is based on manual adjustments of a trained operator and the reconstruction time is more than 10 min per patient.
The proposed method of 3D reconstruction of the spine (C3–L5) relies first on a new manual input strategy designed to fit clinicians’ skills. Then, a parametric model of the spine is computed using statistical inferences, image analysis techniques and fast manual rigid registration.
An agreement study with the clinically used method on a cohort of 57 adolescent scoliotic subjects has shown that both methods have similar performance on vertebral body position and axial rotation (null bias in both cases and standard deviation of signed differences of 1 mm and 3.5° around, respectively). In average, the solution could be computed in less than 5 min of operator time, even for severe scoliosis.
The proposed method allows fast and accurate 3D reconstruction of the spine for wide clinical applications and represents a significant step towards full automatization of 3D reconstruction of the spine. Moreover, it is to the best of our knowledge the first method including also the cervical spine.
KeywordsScoliosis 3D reconstruction Statistical inferences Landmark detection Biplanar X-rays
The authors thank the ParisTech BiomecAM chair program, on subject-specific musculoskeletal modelling and in particular Société Générale and COVEA. The authors would also like to thank Aurélien Laville for having initiated this work.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.
- 7.Schwab F, Farcy J-P, Bridwell K et al (2006) A clinical impact classification of scoliosis in the adult. Spine 31:2109–2114. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.brs.0000231725.38943.ab CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 10.Yazici M, Acaroglu ER, Alanay A et al (2001) Measurement of vertebral rotation in standing versus supine position in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. J Pediatr Orthop 21:252–256Google Scholar
- 11.Dubousset J, Charpak G, Dorion I et al (2005) A new 2D and 3D imaging approach to musculoskeletal physiology and pathology with low-dose radiation and the standing position: the EOS system. Bull Acad Natl Med 189:287–297 (discussion 297–300) Google Scholar
- 19.Aubert B, Vidal PA, Parent S et al (2017) Convolutional neural network and in-painting techniques for the automatic assessment of scoliotic spine surgery from biplanar radiographs. In: Medical image computing and computer-assisted intervention—MICCAI 2017. Springer, Cham, pp 691–699Google Scholar
- 25.Ebrahimi S, Angelini E, Gajny L, Skalli W (2016) Lumbar spine posterior corner detection in X-rays using Haar-based features. In: 2016 IEEE 13th international symposium on biomedical imaging (ISBI), pp 180–183Google Scholar