Relation of lumbar sympathetic chain to the open corridor of retroperitoneal oblique approach to lumbar spine: an MRI study
Retroperitoneal oblique approach to lumbar spine used surgical corridor between psoas muscle and aorta for exposure to anterior part of lumbar spine. Lumbar sympathetic chain (LSC) runs in the corridor to make it a structure at risk of injury.
Does LSC relationship with surgical corridor for minimally invasive retroperitoneal anterolateral oblique approach change in different intervertebral disc level?
Left LSC was identified in axial magnetic resonance imaging images at L2–3, L3–4 and L4–5 intervertebral disc levels of 144 patients. Distances between LSC and left psoas muscle and aorta were recorded.
Mean age of the patients was 62.3 years. LSC was identifiable in 90.9% of levels. Distance between LSC and psoas muscle at L2–3, L3–4 and L4–5 was 4.0 mm, 4.7 mm and 5.2 mm. Statistical difference was found between L2–3 and L4–5 level (p = 0.006). Distance between LSC and aorta at each level was 12.4 mm, 12.3 mm and 10.6 mm without statistical difference. In non-scoliosis group distance between LSC and psoas muscle at each level was 3.1 mm, 3.3 mm and 4.0 mm. Statistical difference was found between L2–3 and L4–5 level (p = 0.012) and between L3–4 and L4–5 level (p = 0.041). Distance between LSC and aorta at each level was 11.9 mm, 11.4 mm and 10.2 mm. Statistical difference was found between L2–3 and L4–5 disc level (p = 0.039).
LSC moves away from psoas muscle and becomes closer to aorta in L4–5 disc level.
KeywordsOblique lumbar interbody fusion Lumbar sympathetic chain Magnetic Resonance Imaging Oblique corridor Minimally invasive surgical approach
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
W. Limthongkul is a consultant for Medtronic. There is no funding or grants related to this research.
- 2.Davis TT, Hynes RA, Fung DA, Spann SW, MacMillan M, Kwon B, Liu J, Acosta F, Drochner TE (2014) Retroperitoneal oblique corridor to the L2–S1 intervertebral discs in the lateral position: an anatomic study. J Neurosurg Spine 21(5):785–793. https://doi.org/10.3171/2014.7.SPINE13564 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 6.Kim JS, Choi WS, Sung JH (2016) 314 Minimally invasive oblique lateral interbody fusion for L4–5: clinical outcomes and perioperative complications. Neurosurgery 63(Suppl 1):190–191. https://doi.org/10.1227/01.neu.0000489803.65103.84 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 7.Mehren C, Mayer HM, Zandanell C, Siepe CJ, Korge A (2016) The oblique anterolateral approach to the lumbar spine provides access to the lumbar spine with few early complications. Clin Orthop Relat Res 474(9):2020–2027. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-016-4883-3 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 8.Abe K, Orita S, Mannoji C, Motegi H, Aramomi M, Ishikawa T, Kotani T, Akazawa T, Morinaga T, Fujiyoshi T, Hasue F, Yamagata M, Hashimoto M, Yamauchi T, Eguchi Y, Suzuki M, Hanaoka E, Inage K, Sato J, Fujimoto K, Shiga Y, Kanamoto H, Yamauchi K, Nakamura J, Suzuki T, Hynes RA, Aoki Y, Takahashi K, Ohtori S (2017) Perioperative complications in 155 patients who underwent oblique lateral interbody fusion surgery: perspectives and indications from a retrospective, multicenter survey. Spine 42(1):55–62. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000001650 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 12.Schulte TL, Adolphs B, Oberdiek D, Osada N, Liljenqvist U, Filler TJ, Marziniak M, Bullmann V (2010) Approach-related lesions of the sympathetic chain in anterior correction and instrumentation of idiopathic scoliosis. Eur Spine J 19(9):1558–1568. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-010-1455-1 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 15.Silvestre C, Mac-Thiong JM, Hilmi R, Roussouly P (2012) Complications and morbidities of mini-open anterior retroperitoneal lumbar interbody fusion: oblique lumbar interbody fusion in 179 patients. Asian Spine J 6(2):89–97. https://doi.org/10.4184/asj.2012.6.2.89 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 16.Theologis AA, Mundis GM Jr., Nguyen S, Okonkwo DO, Mummaneni PV, Smith JS, Shaffrey CI, Fessler R, Bess S, Schwab F, Diebo BG, Burton D, Hart R, Deviren V, Ames C, for the International Spine Study G (2017) Utility of multilevel lateral interbody fusion of the thoracolumbar coronal curve apex in adult deformity surgery in combination with open posterior instrumentation and L5–S1 interbody fusion: a case-matched evaluation of 32 patients. J Neurosurg Spine 26(2):208–219. https://doi.org/10.3171/2016.8.spine151543 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 17.Liu L, Liang Y, Zhang H, Wang H, Guo C, Pu X, Zhang C, Wang L, Wang J, Lv Y, Ren Z, Zhou Q, Deng Z (2016) Imaging anatomical research on the operative windows of oblique lumbar interbody fusion. PLoS ONE 11(9):e0163452. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0163452 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 22.Regev GJ, Chen L, Dhawan M, Lee YP, Garfin SR, Kim CW (2009) Morphometric analysis of the ventral nerve roots and retroperitoneal vessels with respect to the minimally invasive lateral approach in normal and deformed spines. Spine 34(12):1330–1335. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181a029e1 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 23.Zhang F, Xu H, Yin B, Tao H, Yang S, Sun C, Wang Y, Yin J, Shao M, Wang H, Xia X, Ma X, Lu F, Jiang J (2017) Does right lateral decubitus position change retroperitoneal oblique corridor? a radiographic evaluation from L1 to L5. Eur Spine J 26(3):646–650. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-016-4645-7 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 24.Deukmedjian AR, Le TV, Dakwar E, Martinez CR, Uribe JS (2012) Movement of abdominal structures on magnetic resonance imaging during positioning changes related to lateral lumbar spine surgery: a morphometric study—clinical article. J Neurosurg Spine 16(6):615–623. https://doi.org/10.3171/2012.3.SPINE1210 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar