Intraosseous schwannoma of the mobile spine: a report of twenty cases
To clarify the clinical features, surgical strategies, and outcomes of intraosseous schwannoma (IOS) of the mobile spine.
We retrospectively reviewed patients with primary benign spinal schwannoma who underwent surgery in our orthopedic department.
A total of 101 patients with primary benign schwannoma located in the mobile spine underwent surgery in our orthopedic department from 2005 to 2015. Twenty-five patients presented with aggressive features. Twenty patients were regularly followed up, twelve with lesions in the cervical spine, six with lesions in the thoracic region, and two with lesions in the lumbar spine. Preoperative CT-guided biopsy was performed in fourteen cases; the accuracy of diagnosis was 100%, and IOS is not histologically different from conventional schwannoma. The computed tomography (CT) scan revealed expansile and osteolytic bone destruction in all these cases, with six patients having pathological fracture. On T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging, the lobulated schwannomas showed heterogeneous signal intensity and significant heterogeneous enhancement on post-contrast images. Gross total resection was performed in seventeen patients and subtotal resection in three. Tumor-involved nerve roots resection were documented to decrease local recurrence in fourteen cases. The visual analog scale score decreased from 5.66 ± 1.79 preoperatively to 1.16 ± 1.77 at the final follow-up. No local recurrence was noticed at the final follow-up.
CT-guided biopsy is effective for the preoperative diagnosis of spinal IOS. Total resection is the optimal treatment for IOS, whereas subtotal resection could be an alternative choice for high-risk cases.
KeywordsIntraosseous schwannoma Mobile spine Surgery Prognosis Biopsy
Yong Qiang Wang, Jin Xin Hu, and Shao Min Yang contributed equally to this paper.
This study was funded by Peking University Third Hospital (Y71508-01).
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
There is no other conflict of interest.
- 2.Engelhard HH, Villano JL, Porter KR, Stewart AK, Barua M, Barker FG, Newton HB (2010) Clinical presentation, histology, and treatment in 430 patients with primary tumors of the spinal cord, spinal meninges, or cauda equina. J Neurosurg Spine 13:67–77. https://doi.org/10.3171/2010.3.SPINE09430 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 15.Conti P, Pansini G, Mouchaty H, Capuano C, Conti R (2004) Spinal neurinomas: retrospective analysis and long-term outcome of 179 consecutively operated cases and review of the literature. Surg Neurol 61(34–43):44Google Scholar
- 19.Matsumoto Y, Harimaya K, Kawaguchi K, Hayashida M, Okada S, Doi T, Iwamoto Y (2016) Dumbbell scoring system: a new method for the differential diagnosis of malignant and benign spinal dumbbell tumors. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 41:E1230–E1236. https://doi.org/10.1097/brs.0000000000001582 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 20.Li B, Yin H, Meng T, Zhou P, Han Z, Jia Q, Cai W, Han S, Wang T, Chen T, Zhou W, Xiao J (2016) Clinical features and prognostic factors of patients with nerve sheath tumors in the cervical spine. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 41:E1208–E1215. https://doi.org/10.1097/brs.0000000000001595 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 24.Li P, Zhao F, Zhang J, Wang Z, Wang X, Wang B, Yang Z, Yang J, Gao Z, Liu P (2016) Clinical features of spinal schwannomas in 65 patients with schwannomatosis compared with 831 with solitary schwannomas and 102 with neurofibromatosis Type 2: a retrospective study at a single institution. J Neurosurg Spine 24:145–154. https://doi.org/10.3171/2015.3.SPINE141145 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 25.Fehlings MG, Nater A, Zamorano JJ, Tetreault LA, Varga PP, Gokaslan ZL, Boriani S, Fisher CG, Rhines L, Bettegowda C, Kawahara N, Chou D (2016) Risk factors for recurrence of surgically treated conventional spinal schwannomas: analysis of 169 patients from a multicenter international database. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 41:390–398. https://doi.org/10.1097/brs.0000000000001232 CrossRefGoogle Scholar