Advertisement

European Spine Journal

, Volume 27, Issue 10, pp 2602–2608 | Cite as

Is vertebral body stenting in combination with CaP cement superior to kyphoplasty?

  • Sebastian Schützenberger
  • S. M. Schwarz
  • L. Greiner
  • O. Holub
  • S. Grabner
  • W. Huf
  • A. Sailler
  • C. Fialka
Original Article

Abstract

Purpose

In the evolution of the minimally invasive treatment of vertebral compression fractures, vertebral body stenting (VBS) was developed to reduce intraoperative and secondary loss of vertebral height. Particularly in combination with the usage of biodegradable cement, the influence of VBS on the rate of intraoperative complications and long-term outcome is unclear. The purpose of this study was to investigate the differences between balloon kyphoplasty (BKP) and VBS regarding their long-term clinical and radiological outcome in combination with calcium phosphate (CaP) application instead of polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA).

Methods

This retrospective study included 49 patients with fresh mono-segmental thoracolumbar fractures without neurological signs treated with VBS or BKP and CaP cement (Calcibone). The outcome was evaluated with the visual analogue pain scale (VAS), the Oswestry disability score (ODI), and radiologically assessed.

Results

In the course of the radiological follow-up, the VBS group showed statistically significant less vertebral height loss than the BKP group. However, with respect to VAS and ODI scores there were no statistically significant differences between the VBS and BKP group in the clinical follow-up. The rate of cement leakage was comparable in both groups.

Conclusions

Both techniques facilitated good clinical results in combination with absorbable cement augmentation. In particular, the VBS enabled us to benefit from the advantages of the resorbable isothermic CaP cement with an improved radiological outcome in the long term compared to BKP. However, there was a mentionable loss of reduction in the follow-up in both groups compared to previously published data with PMMA cement.

Graphical abstract

These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.

Keywords

Vertebral fracture Kyphoplasty Vertebral body stenting Absorbable cement Calcium phosphate 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

All authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Supplementary material

586_2018_5717_MOESM1_ESM.pptx (215 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (PPTX 215 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Ma X-L, Xing D, Ma J-X et al (2012) Balloon kyphoplasty versus percutaneous vertebroplasty in treating osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture: grading the evidence through a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Spine J 21:1844–1859.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-012-2441-6 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Klezl Z, Majeed H, Bommireddy R, John J (2011) Early results after vertebral body stenting for fractures of the anterior column of the thoracolumbar spine. Injury 42:1038–1042.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2011.04.006 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Lovi A, Teli M, Ortolina A et al (2009) Vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty: complementary techniques for the treatment of painful osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures. A prospective non-randomised study on 154 patients. Eur Spine J 18(Suppl 1):95–101.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-009-0986-9 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Liu J-T, Li C-S, Chang C-S, Liao W-J (2015) Long-term follow-up study of osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture treated using balloon kyphoplasty and vertebroplasty. J Neurosurg Spine 23:94–98.  https://doi.org/10.3171/2014.11.SPINE14579 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Nelson DA, Barker ME, Hamlin BH (1997) Thermal effects of acrylic cementation at bone tumour sites. Int J Hyperth 13:287–306CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Dahl OE, Garvik LJ, Lyberg T (1994) Toxic effects of methylmethacrylate monomer on leukocytes and endothelial cells in vitro. Acta Orthop Scand 65:147–153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hillmeier J, Meeder PJ, Noldge G et al (2004) Balloon kyphoplasty of vertebral compression fractures with a new calcium phosphate cement. Orthopade 33:31–39.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00132-003-0578-z CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Schroder C, Nguyen M, Kraxenberger M et al (2017) Modification of PMMA vertebroplasty cement for reduced stiffness by addition of normal saline: a material properties evaluation. Eur Spine J 26:3209–3215.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-016-4845-1 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ryu K-S, Shim J-H, Heo H-Y, Park C-K (2010) Therapeutic efficacy of injectable calcium phosphate cement in osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures: prospective nonrandomized controlled study at 6-month follow-up. World Neurosurg 73:408–411.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2010.01.006 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Gioia G, Mandelli D, Gogue R (2012) Treatment of typical amyelic somatic fractures with kyphoplasty and calcium phosphate cement: a critical analysis. Eur Spine J 21(Suppl 1):S108–S111.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-012-2225-z CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Maestretti G, Cremer C, Otten P, Jakob RP (2007) Prospective study of standalone balloon kyphoplasty with calcium phosphate cement augmentation in traumatic fractures. Eur Spine J 16:601–610.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-006-0258-x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hong S-J, Park Y-K, Kim JH et al (2006) The biomechanical evaluation of calcium phosphate cements for use in vertebroplasty. J Neurosurg Spine 4:154–159.  https://doi.org/10.3171/spi.2006.4.2.154 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Grafe IA, Baier M, Noldge G et al (2008) Calcium–phosphate and polymethylmethacrylate cement in long-term outcome after kyphoplasty of painful osteoporotic vertebral fractures. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 33:1284–1290CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Furderer S, Anders M, Schwindling B et al (2002) Vertebral body stenting. A method for repositioning and augmenting vertebral compression fractures. Orthopade 31:356–361CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Matejka J, Zeman J, Belatka J et al (2011) Vertebral body augmentation using a vertebral body stent. Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cechoslov 78:442–446Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Rotter R, Martin H, Fuerderer S et al (2010) Vertebral body stenting: a new method for vertebral augmentation versus kyphoplasty. Eur Spine J 19:916–923.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-010-1341-x CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Wang D, Zheng S, Liu A et al (2018) The role of minimally invasive vertebral body stent on reduction of the deflation effect after kyphoplasty: a biomechanical study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 43:E341–E347.  https://doi.org/10.1097/brs.0000000000002317 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Disch AC, Schmoelz W (2014) Cement augmentation in a thoracolumbar fracture model: reduction and stability after balloon kyphoplasty versus vertebral body stenting. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 39:E1147–E1153.  https://doi.org/10.1097/brs.0000000000000470 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Werner CML, Osterhoff G, Schlickeiser J et al (2013) Vertebral body stenting versus kyphoplasty for the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures: a randomized trial. J Bone Jt Surg Am 95:577–584.  https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.L.00024 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Meyers SP, Wiener SN (1991) Magnetic resonance imaging features of fractures using the short tau inversion recovery (STIR) sequence: correlation with radiographic findings. Skelet Radiol 20:499–507CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Magerl F, Aebi M, Gertzbein SD et al (1994) A comprehensive classification of thoracic and lumbar injuries. Eur Spine J 3:184–201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Garfin SR, Yuan HA, Reiley MA (2001) New technologies in spine: kyphoplasty and vertebroplasty for the treatment of painful osteoporotic compression fractures. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 26:1511–1515CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Osthus H, Cziske R, Jacobi E (2006) Cross-cultural adaptation of a German version of the Oswestry disability index and evaluation of its measurement properties. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 31:E448–E453CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Merritt JL, McLean TJ, Erickson RP, Offord KP (1986) Measurement of trunk flexibility in normal subjects: reproducibility of three clinical methods. Mayo Clin Proc 61:192–197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Kuklo TR, Polly DW, Owens BD et al (2001) Measurement of thoracic and lumbar fracture kyphosis: evaluation of intraobserver, interobserver, and technique variability. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 26:61–65 (discussion 66) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    R Core Team (2013) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. http://www.R-project.org/
  27. 27.
    Bates D, Mächler M, Bolker B, Walker S (2015) Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. J Stat Softw.  https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Martin-Lopez JE, Pavon-Gomez MJ, Romero-Tabares A, Molina-Lopez T (2015) Stentoplasty effectiveness and safety for the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral fractures: a systematic review. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 101:627–632.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otsr.2015.06.002 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Heo D-H, Kuh S-U (2007) Progressive, repeated lumbar compression fracture at the same level after vertebral kyphoplasty with calcium phosphate cement. Case report. J Neurosurg Spine 6:559–562.  https://doi.org/10.3171/spi.2007.6.6.7 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Blattert TR, Jestaedt L, Weckbach A (2009) Suitability of a calcium phosphate cement in osteoporotic vertebral body fracture augmentation: a controlled, randomized, clinical trial of balloon kyphoplasty comparing calcium phosphate versus polymethylmethacrylate. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 34:108–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Piazzolla A, De Giorgi G, Solarino G (2011) Vertebral body recollapse without trauma after kyphoplasty with calcium phosphate cement. Musculoskelet Surg 95:141–145.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12306-011-0130-y CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Klein R, Tetzlaff R, Weiss C et al (2017) Osteointegration and resorption of intravertebral and extravertebral calcium phosphate cement. Clin Spine Surg 30:E291–E296CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Wang H, Sribastav SS, Ye F et al (2015) Comparison of percutaneous vertebroplasty and balloon kyphoplasty for the treatment of single level vertebral compression fractures: a meta-analysis of the literature. Pain Physician 18:209–222PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Cankaya D, Yilmaz S, Deveci A et al (2015) Clinical and radiological outcomes of conservative treatment after stable post-traumatic thoracolumbar fractures in elderly: is it really best option for all elderly patients? Ann Med Surg (Lond) 4:346–350CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Shamji MF, Roffey DM, Young DK et al (2014) A pilot evaluation of the role of bracing in stable thoracolumbar burst fractures without neurological deficit. J Spinal Disord Tech 27:370–375.  https://doi.org/10.1097/BSD.0b013e31826eacae CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.AUVA Trauma Center MeidlingViennaAustria
  2. 2.Karl Landsteiner Institute for Clinical Risk ManagementViennaAustria

Personalised recommendations