Population-averaged MRI atlases for automated image processing and assessments of lumbar paraspinal muscles
- 403 Downloads
Growing evidence suggests an association between lumbar paraspinal muscle degeneration and low back pain (LBP). Currently, time-consuming and laborious manual segmentations of paraspinal muscles are commonly performed on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) axial scans. Automated image analysis algorithms can mitigate these drawbacks, but they often require individual MRIs to be aligned to a standard “reference” atlas. Such atlases are well established in automated neuroimaging analysis. Our aim was to create atlases of similar nature for automated paraspinal muscle measurements.
Lumbosacral T2-weighted MRIs were acquired from 117 patients who experienced LBP, stratified by gender and age group (30–39, 40–49, and 50–59 years old). Axial MRI slices of the L4–L5 and L5–S1 levels at mid-disc were obtained and aligned using group-wise linear and nonlinear image registration to produce a set of unbiased population-averaged atlases for lumbar paraspinal muscles.
The resulting atlases represent the averaged morphology and MRI intensity features of the corresponding cohorts. Differences in paraspinal muscle shapes and fat infiltration levels with respect to gender and age can be visually identified from the population-averaged data from both linear and nonlinear registrations.
We constructed a set of population-averaged atlases for developing automated algorithms to help analyze paraspinal muscle morphometry from axial MRI scans. Such an advancement could greatly benefit the fields of paraspinal muscle and LBP research.
KeywordsLumbar paraspinal muscles MRI atlas Image processing Measurement Multifidus
This project was partly funded by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) Discovery Grant RGPIN-2015-04136.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflicts of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
- 4.Zotti MGT, Boas FV, Clifton T, Piche M, Yoon WW, Freeman BJC (2017) Does pre-operative magnetic resonance imaging of the lumbar multifidus muscle predict clinical outcomes following lumbar spinal decompression for symptomatic spinal stenosis? Eur Spine J 26(10):2589–2597. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-017-4986-x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 5.Shahidi B, Parra CL, Berry DB, Hubbard JC, Gombatto S, Zlomislic V, Allen RT, Hughes-Austin J, Garfin S, Ward SR (2017) Contribution of lumbar spine pathology and age to paraspinal muscle size and fatty infiltration. Spine 42(8):616–623. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000001848 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 6.Hodges P, Holm AK, Hansson T, Holm S (2006) Rapid atrophy of the lumbar multifidus follows experimental disc or nerve root injury. Spine 31(25):2926–2933. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.brs.0000248453.51165.0b CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 16.May A, Gaser C (2006) Magnetic resonance-based morphometry: a window into structural plasticity of the brain. Curr Opin Neurol 19(4):407–411. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.wco.0000236622.91495.21 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 17.Xiao Y, Bailey L, Chakravarty MM, Beriault S, Sadikot AF, Pike GB, Collins DL (2012) Atlas-based segmentation of the subthalamic nucleus, red nucleus, and substantia nigra for deep brain stimulation by incorporating multiple MRI contrasts. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the third international conference on Information Processing in Computer-Assisted Interventions, Pisa, ItalyCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 18.Xiao Y, Fonov VS, Beriault S, Gerard I, Sadikot AF, Pike GB, Collins DL (2015) Patch-based label fusion segmentation of brainstem structures with dual-contrast MRI for Parkinson’s disease. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg 10(7):1029–1041. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-014-1119-4 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar