Post-operative regression of retro-odontoid pseudotumors treated with and without fusion
- 36 Downloads
Retro-odontoid pseudotumor is common in elderly people and is a cause of cervical myelopathy. The goal of the study was to investigate surgical procedures, outcomes, and post-operative spontaneous regression of posterior cervical retro-odontoid pseudotumors.
The subjects were 29 patients who underwent surgery for myelopathy due to a retro-odontoid pseudotumor around the craniocervical region at 9 facilities and were followed-up for an average of 54 months (range 12–96 months). Data were collected in a multicenter review of a retrospective database. Comparisons were performed between cases treated with and without fusion.
The JOA recovery rate at final follow-up did not differ significantly between the fusion (n = 17, including all 15 patients with atlantoaxial subluxation) and non-fusion (n = 12) groups. However, pseudotumor regression was significantly more frequent in the fusion group (100% vs. 42%, p < 0.01). In all patients, regression cases had significantly higher rates of contrast enhancement of the pseudotumor on pre-operative T1 gadolinium-enhanced MRI (68% vs. 14%, p = 0.013) and of JOA recovery (50% vs. 30%, p < 0.01).
Regression of pseudotumor occurred in all cases treated with fusion surgery. There was a significant difference in pseudotumor regression with or without fusion, and regression was significantly related to gadolinium enhancement on MRI. Therefore, it is preferable to use fusion surgery for a retro-odontoid pseudotumor that shows contrast enhancement, even if there is no apparent instability pre-operatively.
KeywordsRetro-odontoid pseudotumor Atlantoaxial instability Occipitocervical fusion Posterior decompression Spinal fusion Gadolinium-enhanced MRI
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
None of the authors have a conflict of interest.
- 15.Tominaga F, Shirasawa K, Yamashita A et al (2015) Operation for retro-odontoid pseudotumor. Seikei-geka 66:311–314 [in Japanese] Google Scholar
- 17.Igarashi T, Hayashi M, Shibuya J et al (2015) Retroodontoid pseudotumor increased after cervical spinal decompression: a case report. Tohokuseisaishi 57:114–118Google Scholar
- 18.White AA, Panjabi MM (1990) Clinical biomechanism of the spine, 2nd edn. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, PhiladelphiaGoogle Scholar
- 19.Japanese Orthopaedic Association (1994) Scoring system for cervical myelopathy. J Jpn Orthop Assoc 68:490–530 [in Japanese] Google Scholar
- 26.Arima H, Murata H, Hasegawa T et al (2013) Treatment of retro-odontoid pseudotumor. Report of five cases. Rinsyo Seikei-geka 48:81–85 [in Japanese] Google Scholar
- 30.Wakatsuki T, Matsusaki M, Tanaka N et al (2016) Myelopathy recurrence by retro-odontoid cyst after atlas laminectomy for retro-odontoid pseudotumor: report of a case. Seikei-geka 67:243–246 [in Japanese] Google Scholar