Advertisement

European Spine Journal

, Volume 27, Issue 7, pp 1586–1592 | Cite as

Health-related quality of life in patients undergoing cervico-thoracic osteotomies for fixed cervico-thoracic kyphosis in patients with ankylosing spondylitis

  • Silviu SabouEmail author
  • Hossein Mehdian
  • Dritan Pasku
  • Luca Boriani
  • Nasir A. Quraishi
Original Article

Abstract

Purpose

Ankylosing spondylitis (AS) can result in severe cervico-thoracic kyphotic deformity (CTKD). Few studies have addressed the relationship between cervico-thoracic osteotomies in AS and health-related quality of life scores. The aim of this study is to evaluate the impact of cervico-thoracic osteotomy (CTO) on improving quality of life for patients with fixed CTKD.

Methods

A database of all patients who underwent a CTO for CTKD in patients with AS was created. Data entered into the database consisted of patients’ demographics and comorbidities, as well as surgical, clinical and radiological data. The outcome measures used in our study were Neck Disability Index (NDI), EuroQol 5D-5L (EQ-5D-5L) and Visual Analogue Scale. We also measured the following radiological parameters: chin-brow to vertical angle (CBVA), C7-Slope, C2–7 angle, Regional Kyphosis Angle, C2–C7 sagittal vertical axis (SVA) and C7–S1 SVA.

Results

A total of 13 male patients with AS were included in our study. The mean age was 57.5 years (40–74); and mean follow-up was 37.6 months (12–78). Following the C7–T1 osteotomy (10 Smith Peterson Osteotomies and 3 Pedicle Subtraction Osteotomies), NDI improved from a mean of 65.54 (SD 8.95) to a mean of 22.09 (SD 6.99). The EQ-5D-5L improved from a mean of 0.41 (SD 0.16) to 0.86 (SD 0.088). Pre-operative CBVA was on average 54° (40°–75°) and post-operative was 7° (2°–12°). There were no major complications, 1 superficial infection and 5 minor nerve root irritations.

Conclusions

Cervical osteotomy for the management of fixed flexion deformity of cervical spine in ankylosing spondylitis is a safe procedure and can result in restoration of horizontal gaze and sagittal balance with significant improvement of the patient’s health-related quality of life.

Graphical abstract

These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.

Keywords

Spinal osteotomy Ankylosing spondylitis Outcome Complications Quality of life 

Notes

Funding

The manuscript submitted does not contain information about medical device(s)/drug(s). No funds were received in support of this work. No relevant financial activities outside the submitted work.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Supplementary material

586_2018_5530_MOESM1_ESM.pptx (135 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (PPTX 135 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Sieper J, Braun J, Rudwaleit M, Boonen A, Zink A (2002) Ankylosing spondylitis: an overview. Ann Rheum Dis 61(Suppl 3):iii8–iii18CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Wurm H (1955) Pathological anatomy and pathology of inflammatory ankylosing spondylitis (Bechterew–Marie–Strumpell disease). Z Rheumaforsch 14:337–364PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Braun J, Sieper J (2007) Ankylosing spondylitis. Lancet 369:1379–1390.  https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(07)60635-7 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Dakwar E, Reddy J, Vale FL, Uribe JS (2008) A review of the pathogenesis of ankylosing spondylitis. Neurosurg Focus 24:E2.  https://doi.org/10.3171/foc/2008/24/1/e2 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Khalessi AA, Oh BC, Wang MY (2008) Medical management of ankylosing spondylitis. Neurosurg Focus 24:E4.  https://doi.org/10.3171/foc/2008/24/1/e4 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Mehdian SM, Freeman BJ, Licina P (1999) Cervical osteotomy for ankylosing spondylitis: an innovative variation on an existing technique. Eur Spine J 8:505–509CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lee JS, Youn MS, Shin JK, Goh TS, Kang SS (2015) Relationship between cervical sagittal alignment and quality of life in ankylosing spondylitis. Eur Spine J 24:1199–1203.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-014-3491-8 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Tokala DP, Lam KS, Freeman BJ, Webb JK (2007) C7 decancellisation closing wedge osteotomy for the correction of fixed cervico-thoracic kyphosis. Eur Spine J 16:1471–1478.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-006-0290-x CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Urist MR (1958) Osteotomy of the cervical spine; report of a case of ankylosing rheumatoid spondylitis. J Bone Jt Surg Am 40-A:833–843CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Theologis AA, Tabaraee E, Funao H, Smith JS, Burch S, Tay B, Kebaish K, Deviren V, Ames C (2015) Three-column osteotomies of the lower cervical and upper thoracic spine: comparison of early outcomes, radiographic parameters, and peri-operative complications in 48 patients. Eur Spine J 24(Suppl 1):S23–S30.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-014-3655-6 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ward MM (1998) Quality of life in patients with ankylosing spondylitis. Rheum Dis Clin N Am 24:815–827 (x) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ozgul A, Peker F, Taskaynatan MA, Tan AK, Dincer K, Kalyon TA (2006) Effect of ankylosing spondylitis on health-related quality of life and different aspects of social life in young patients. Clin Rheumatol 25:168–174.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10067-005-1150-5 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Bostan EE, Borman P, Bodur H, Barca N (2003) Functional disability and quality of life in patients with ankylosing spondylitis. Rheumatol Int 23:121–126.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00296-002-0261-4 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ames CP, Smith JS, Scheer JK, Shaffrey CI, Lafage V, Deviren V, Moal B, Protopsaltis T, Mummaneni PV, Mundis GM Jr, Hostin R, Klineberg E, Burton DC, Hart R, Bess S, Schwab FJ (2013) A standardized nomenclature for cervical spine soft-tissue release and osteotomy for deformity correction: clinical article. J Neurosurg Spine 19:269–278.  https://doi.org/10.3171/2013.5.spine121067 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Glassman SD, Hamill CL, Bridwell KH, Schwab FJ, Dimar JR, Lowe TG (2007) The impact of perioperative complications on clinical outcome in adult deformity surgery. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 32:2764–2770.  https://doi.org/10.1097/brs.0b013e31815a7644 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Wollowick A (2011) Osteotomies for the treatment of cervical kyphosis caused by ankylosing spondylitis: indications and techniques. Semin Spinal Surg 23(3)188–198.  https://doi.org/10.1053/j.semss.2011.04.009 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kim KT, Park DH, Lee SH, Lee JH (2015) Results of corrective osteotomy and treatment strategy for ankylosing spondylitis with kyphotic deformity. Clin Orthop Surg 7:330–336.  https://doi.org/10.4055/cios.2015.7.3.330 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Deviren V, Scheer JK, Ames CP (2011) Technique of cervicothoracic junction pedicle subtraction osteotomy for cervical sagittal imbalance: report of 11 cases. J Neurosurg Spine 15:174–181.  https://doi.org/10.3171/2011.3.spine10536 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Shimizu K, Matsushita M, Fujibayashi S, Toguchida J, Ido K, Nakamura T (1996) Correction of kyphotic deformity of the cervical spine in ankylosing spondylitis using general anesthesia and internal fixation. J Spinal Disord 9:540–543CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    McMaster MJ (1997) Osteotomy of the cervical spine in ankylosing spondylitis. J Bone Jt Surg Br 79:197–203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Scheer JK, Tang JA, Buckley JM, Deviren V, Pekmezci M, McClellan RT, Ames CP (2011) Biomechanical analysis of osteotomy type and rod diameter for treatment of cervicothoracic kyphosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 36:E519–E523.  https://doi.org/10.1097/brs.0b013e3181f65de1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Weatherley C, Jaffray D, Terry A (1988) Vascular complications associated with osteotomy in ankylosing spondylitis: a report of two cases. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 13:43–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Liu H, Qian BP, Qiu Y, Mao SH, Qu Z, Wang B, Yu Y, Zhu ZZ (2017) Does the traversing length of the aorta change after closing wedge osteotomy for ankylosing spondylitis patients with thoracolumbar kyphosis?: A magnetic resonance imaging investigation. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 42:106–112.  https://doi.org/10.1097/brs.0000000000001781 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Gertzbein SD, Harris MB (1992) Wedge osteotomy for the correction of post-traumatic kyphosis. A new technique and a report of three cases. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 17:374–379CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Chang KW, Cheng CW, Chen HC, Chang KI, Chen TC (2008) Closing-opening wedge osteotomy for the treatment of sagittal imbalance. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 33:1470–1477.  https://doi.org/10.1097/brs.0b013e3181753bcd CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Zhang X, Zhang Z, Wang J, Lu M, Hu W, Wang Y (2016) Vertebral column decancellation: a new spinal osteotomy technique for correcting rigid thoracolumbar kyphosis in patients with ankylosing spondylitis. Bone Jt J 98-B:672–678.  https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620x.98b5.35726 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Mehdian H, Arun R, Aresti NA (2015) V–Y vertebral body osteotomy for the treatment of fixed sagittal plane spinal deformity. Spine J Off J N Am Spine Soc 15:771–776.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2015.01.014 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Patel K, Tajsic T, Budohoski KP, Guilfoyle MR, Trivedi RA (2017) Simultaneous navigated cervico-thoracic and thoraco-lumbar fixation. Eur Spine J.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-017-5233-1 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Suk KS, Kim KT, Lee SH, Kim JM (2003) Significance of chin-brow vertical angle in correction of kyphotic deformity of ankylosing spondylitis patients. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 28:2001–2005.  https://doi.org/10.1097/01.brs.0000083239.06023.78 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Song K, Su X, Zhang Y, Liu C, Tang X, Zhang G, Zheng G, Cui G, Zhang X, Mao K, Wang Z, Wang Y (2016) Optimal chin-brow vertical angle for sagittal visual fields in ankylosing spondylitis kyphosis. Eur Spine J 25:2596–2604.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-016-4588-z CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Complex Spine SurgerySalford Royal NHS Foundation TrustSalfordUK
  2. 2.Centre for Spinal Studies and SurgeryQueens Medical Centre Campus of Nottingham University Hospitals NHS TrustNottinghamUK

Personalised recommendations