Reviewer’s comment concerning “Classification of normal sagittal spine alignment: refounding the Roussouly classification” by F. Laouissat et al. (2017). doi:10.1007/s00586-017-5111-x (Epub ahead of print)

Reviewer's Comment


Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The author declares that he has no competing interests.


  1. 1.
    Roussouly P, Gollogly S, Berthonnaud E, Dimnet J (2005) Classification of the normal variation in the sagittal alignment of the human lumbar spine and pelvis in the standing position. Spine 30:346–353CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Laouissat F, Sebaaly A, Gehrchen M, Roussouly P (2017) Classification of normal sagittal spine alignment: refounding the Roussouly classification. Eur Spine J. Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Roussouly P, Pinheiro-Franco JL (2011) Biomechanical analysis of the spino-pelvic organization and adaptation in pathology. Eur Spine J 20(Suppl 5):609–618. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Maillot C, Ferrero E, Fort D, Heyberger C, Le Huec JC (2015) Reproducibility and repeatability of a new computerized software for sagittal spinopelvic and scoliosis curvature radiologic measurements: Keops(®). Eur Spine J 24(7):1574–1581. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico GaleazziMilanItaly

Personalised recommendations