Sagittal imbalance treated with L5 pedicle subtraction osteotomy with short lumbar fusion from L4 to sacrum using four screws into L4 for enhanced fixation two additional vertebral screws: a technical note
- 374 Downloads
To report on suggested technique with four screws in a single vertebra (two pedicle screws and two direct vertebral body screws) for enhanced fixation with just one level cranially to a pedicle subtraction osteotomy (PSO).
A 60-year-old woman underwent L4/5 fusion surgery for degenerative spondylolisthesis. Two years later, she was unable to stand upright even for a short time because of lumbar kyphosis caused by subsidence of the fusion cage and of Baastrup syndrome in the upper lumbar spine [sagittal vertical axis (SVA) of 114 mm, pelvic incidence of 75°, and lumbar lordosis (LL) of 41°]. She underwent short-segment fusion from L4 to the sacrum with L5 pedicle subtraction osteotomy. We reinforced the construct with two vertebral screws at L4 in addition to the conventional L4 pedicle screws.
After the surgery, her sagittal parameters were improved (SVA, 36 mm; LL, 54°). Two years after the corrective surgery, she maintained a low sagittal vertical axis though high residual pelvic tilt indicated that the patient was still compensating for residual sagittal misalignment.
PSO surgery for sagittal imbalance usually requires a long fusion at least two levels above and below the osteotomy site to achieve adequate stability and better global alignment. However, longer fixation may decrease the patients’ quality of life and cause a proximal junctional failure. Our novel technique may shorten the fixation area after osteotomy surgery.
KeywordsSagittal imbalance Pedicle subtraction osteotomy Baastrup syndrome Vertebral screw Four-rod construct
No funds were receive in support of this work.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
No conflict of interest is declared.
- 5.Pateder DB, Park YS, Kebaish KM, Cascio BM, Buchowski JM, Song EW, Shapiro MB, Kostuik JP (2006) Spinal fusion after revision surgery for pseudarthrosis in adult scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 31:E314–E319. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.brs.0000217619.57333.96 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 7.Fujimori T, Okuda S, Iwasaki M, Yamasaki R, Maeno T, Yamashita T, Matsumoto T, Wada E, Oda T (2016) Validity of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association scoring system based on patient-reported improvement after posterior lumbar interbody fusion. Spine J. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2016.01.181 Google Scholar
- 14.Tsuchiya K, Bridwell KH, Kuklo TR, Lenke LG, Baldus C (2006) Minimum 5-year analysis of L5–S1 fusion using sacropelvic fixation (bilateral S1 and iliac screws) for spinal deformity. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 31:303–308. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.brs.0000197193.81296.f1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 15.Cheh G, Bridwell KH, Lenke LG, Buchowski JM, Daubs MD, Kim Y, Baldus C (2007) Adjacent segment disease following lumbar/thoracolumbar fusion with pedicle screw instrumentation: a minimum 5-year follow-up. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 32:2253–2257. https://doi.org/10.1097/brs.0b013e31814b2d8e CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 19.Yilgor C, Sogunmez N, Boissiere L, Yavuz Y, Obeid I, Kleinstuck F, Perez-Grueso FJS, Acaroglu E, Haddad S, Mannion AF, Pellise F, Alanay A, European Spine Study G (2017) Global Alignment and Proportion (GAP) Score: development and validation of a new method of analyzing spinopelvic alignment to predict mechanical complications after adult spinal deformity surgery. J Bone Jt Surg Am 99:1661–1672. https://doi.org/10.2106/jbjs.16.01594 CrossRefGoogle Scholar