The mechanism in junctional failure of thoraco-lumbar fusions. Part II: Analysis of a series of PJK after thoraco-lumbar fusion to determine parameters allowing to predict the risk of junctional breakdown
- 151 Downloads
To identify risk factors, in 12 patients with junctional breakdown (JBD) after thoraco-sacral fusions and to test a software locating maximal bending moment on full spine EOS images.
Twelve patients underwent long fusions for lumbar degenerative pathologies. Preop EOS images were compared to first postop EOS showing JBD. Parameters analyzed were: spinopelvic parameters [pelvic incidence (PI), pelvic tilt (PT), sacral slope (SS), sagittal vertical axis (SVA), spinosacral angle (SSA), lordosis, and kyphosis], proximal junctional angle (PJA), odontoid-hip axis angle (ODHA), and CIA. A new software estimated the location of maximum bending moment (M max) before and after JBD.
All patients except one had a JBD located between T10 and L1, diagnosed at average follow-up of 18.58 months. JBD was a fracture in six patients, severe adjacent disc degeneration in the remaining. Average PI was 52°. PT increased, SS decreased after JBD versus preop (p > 0.05). Average PJA was 34.5°. Global lordosis (GLL), upper lordosis (ULL), L4–S1 lordosis, and thoracic kyphosis (TK) were increased (p < 0.05). Lower lumbar lordosis (LLL), was not increased postJBD (p = 0.6). SVA, SSA, ODHA, and C7 slope were not modified (p > 0.05). CIA average value decreased by 7.5% after JBD. T1–T5 alignment was correlated to C7 slope before (R 2 = 0.77075) and after JBD (R 2 = 0.85409). ODHA decreased after JBD (p > 0.05). Most JBD occurred at or one level away from preoperative M max location.
This study confirms the importance of harmonious distribution of lumbar (GLL, ULL, and ILL) and thoracic curves (TK, T1–T5 segment) in thoraco-sacral fusions. All patients showed an exaggerated ULL, resulting in a posterior shift and increased lever arm at the thoraco-lumbar junction, leading to JBD.
KeywordsProximal junctional kyphosis Proximal junctional failure Bending moment Vertebral fracture Sagittal balance
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
There is no conflict of interest.
- 5.Le Huec JC, Charosky S, Barrey C, Rigal J, Aunoble S (2011) Sagittal imbalance cascade for simple degenerative spine and consequences: algorithm of decision for appropriate treatment. Eur Spine J 20(Suppl 5):699–703. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-011-1938-8 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 6.Le Huec JC, Faundez A, Dominguez D, Hoffmeyer P, Aunoble S (2015) Evidence showing the relationship between sagittal balance and clinical outcomes in surgical treatment of degenerative spinal diseases: a literature review. Int Orthop 39:87–95. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-014-2516-6 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 8.Bridwell KH, Lenke LG, Cho SK, Pahys JM, Zebala LP, Dorward IG, Cho W, Baldus C, Hill BW, Kang MM (2013) Proximal junctional kyphosis in primary adult deformity surgery: evaluation of 20 degrees as a critical angle. Neurosurgery 72:899–906. https://doi.org/10.1227/NEU.0b013e31828bacd8 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 13.Kim HJ, Bridwell KH, Lenke LG, Park MS, Song KS, Piyaskulkaew C, Chuntarapas T (2014) Patients with proximal junctional kyphosis requiring revision surgery have higher postoperative lumbar lordosis and larger sagittal balance corrections. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 39:E576–E580. https://doi.org/10.1097/brs.0000000000000246 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 14.Kim HJ, Yagi M, Nyugen J, Cunningham ME, Boachie-Adjei O (2012) Combined anterior-posterior surgery is the most important risk factor for developing proximal junctional kyphosis in idiopathic scoliosis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 470:1633–1639. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-011-2179-1 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 15.Kim YJ, Bridwell KH, Lenke LG, Glattes CR, Rhim S, Cheh G (2008) Proximal junctional kyphosis in adult spinal deformity after segmental posterior spinal instrumentation and fusion: minimum five-year follow-up. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 33:2179–2184. https://doi.org/10.1097/brs.0b013e31817c0428 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 17.Kim YJ, Lenke LG, Bridwell KH, Kim J, Cho SK, Cheh G, Yoon J (2007) Proximal junctional kyphosis in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis after 3 different types of posterior segmental spinal instrumentation and fusions: incidence and risk factor analysis of 410 cases. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 32:2731–2738. https://doi.org/10.1097/brs.0b013e31815a7ead CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 18.Lau D, Clark AJ, Scheer JK, Daubs MD, Coe JD, Paonessa KJ, LaGrone MO, Kasten MD, Amaral RA, Trobisch PD, Lee JH, Fabris-Monterumici D, Anand N, Cree AK, Hart RA, Hey LA, Ames CP, Committee SRSASD (2014) Proximal junctional kyphosis and failure after spinal deformity surgery: a systematic review of the literature as a background to classification development. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 39:2093–2102. https://doi.org/10.1097/brs.0000000000000627 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 20.Lonner BS, Newton P, Betz R, Scharf C, O’Brien M, Sponseller P, Lenke L, Crawford A, Lowe T, Letko L, Harms J, Shufflebarger H (2007) Operative management of Scheuermann’s kyphosis in 78 patients: radiographic outcomes, complications, and technique. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 32:2644–2652. https://doi.org/10.1097/brs.0b013e31815a5238 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 21.Maruo K, Ha Y, Inoue S, Samuel S, Okada E, Hu SS, Deviren V, Burch S, William S, Ames CP, Mummaneni PV, Chou D, Berven SH (2013) Predictive factors for proximal junctional kyphosis in long fusions to the sacrum in adult spinal deformity. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 38:E1469–E1476. https://doi.org/10.1097/brs.0b013e3182a51d43 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 26.Yagi M, King AB, Boachie-Adjei O (2012) Incidence, risk factors, and natural course of proximal junctional kyphosis: surgical outcomes review of adult idiopathic scoliosis. Minimum 5 years of follow-up. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 37:1479–1489. https://doi.org/10.1097/brs.0b013e31824e4888 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 30.Meeh C (1895) Volummessungen des menschlichen Körpers und seiner einzelner Teile in der verschiedenen Altersstufen. Ztschr fur Biologie 13:125–147Google Scholar