Minimal-invasive revision of adjacent level disease after MIS deformity surgery

  • Nils Hansen-Algenstaedt
  • Melanie Liem
  • SalahAddeen O. Khalifah
  • Johannes Holz
  • Alf Giese
Open Operating Theatre (OOT)

Keywords

Minimal invasive spine surgery MIS Percutaneous pedicle screw replacement Pedicle subtraction osteotomy Sagittal balance Minimal invasive revision surgery Kyphoscoliosis Posterior spinal fusion Minimal invasive osteotomy Minimal invasive TLIF 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Supplementary material

586_2017_5383_MOESM1_ESM.wmv (515.6 mb)
ESM1 (wmv 527998 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Hansen-Algenstaedt N, Liem M, Khalifah SO, Ilg A, Giese A (2016) Minimal-invasive TLIF. Eur Spine J 25:473–475CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Karikari IO, Isaacs RE (2010) Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a review of techniques and outcomes. Spine 35:S294–S301CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kim CW (2010) Scientific basis of minimally invasive spine surgery: prevention of multifidus muscle injury during posterior lumbar surgery. Spine 35:S281–S286CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hansen-Algenstaedt N, Khalifah S, Liem M, Holz J, Giese A (2016) MIS revision of de novo scoliosis and stenosis, following open spinal instrumentation. Eur Spine J 25:476–479CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Wong AP, Smith ZA, Nixon AT, Lawton CD, Dahdaleh NS, Wong RH, Auffinger B, Lam S, Song JK, Liu JC, Koski TR, Fessler RG (2015) Intraoperative and perioperative complications in minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a review of 513 patients. J Neurosurg Spine 22:487–495CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Yee TJ, Terman SW, La Marca F, Park P (2014) Comparison of adjacent segment disease after minimally invasive or open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. J Clin Neurosci 21:1796–1801CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bresnahan L, Ogden AT, Natarajan RN, Fessler RG (2009) A biomechanical evaluation of graded posterior element removal for treatment of lumbar stenosis: comparison of a minimally invasive approach with two standard laminectomy techniques. Spine 34:17–23CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Wang TY, Farber SH, Perkins SS, Back AG, Byrd SA, Chi D, Vincent D, Karikari IO (2017) Internally randomized control trial of radiation exposure using ultra-low radiation imaging versus traditional C-arm fluoroscopy for patients undergoing single-level minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. Spine 42:217–223CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Overley SC, Cho SK, Mehta AI, Arnold PM (2017) Navigation and robotics in spinal surgery: where are we now? Neurosurgery 80:S86–S99CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Roser F, Tatagiba M, Maier G (2013) Spinal robotics: current applications and future perspectives. Neurosurgery 72(Suppl 1):12–18CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nils Hansen-Algenstaedt
    • 1
  • Melanie Liem
    • 1
  • SalahAddeen O. Khalifah
    • 1
  • Johannes Holz
    • 1
  • Alf Giese
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Spine SurgeryOrthoCentrum Hamburg, Park-Klinik ManhagenHamburgGermany

Personalised recommendations