Advertisement

European Spine Journal

, Volume 27, Issue 6, pp 1266–1271 | Cite as

The prevalence of congenital C1 arch anomalies

  • Gina Hyun
  • Emad Allam
  • Paul Sander
  • Christopher Hasiak
  • Yihua Zhou
Original Article

Abstract

Purpose

To determine the prevalence, radiographic features and reporting rate of, and the association between the congenital anterior and posterior C1 arch anomalies.

Methods

The computed tomography (CT) images of the cervical spines of all patients over 18 years who had CT examinations in our hospital during the study period were reviewed to evaluate for congenital anomalies of the anterior and posterior C1 arches. Radiology reports of the corresponding CT examinations were reviewed to determine the reporting rate of these defects.

Results

Of 3273 subjects, 185 (5.65%) had congenital atlas anomalies: 169 isolated posterior (5.16%), 15 combined anterior and posterior (bipartite, 0.46%), and one isolated anterior (0.031%) arch defects. Females had a higher prevalence than males (7.46 versus 4.72%, P = 0.0013). Eighty-three cases (44.9%) of C1 arch anomalies were not reported. The Currarino type A, B, C and E posterior arch defects accounted for 81.6, 8.1, 1.1, and 0.5% of all arch anomalies while type D was not observed. Fifteen patients (0.46%) had combined anterior and posterior arch anomalies (bipartite atlas) versus only one with an isolated anterior C1 defect, indicating a significant association between the anterior and posterior arch defects (P < 0.0001).

Conclusions

Although some types of congenital C1 arch anomalies are rare, type A defects are relatively common radiological findings that are unreported approximately 45% of the time. Based on the significant association between the anterior and posterior arch defects, we propose possible mechanisms for the formation of the bipartite atlas.

Keywords

Congenital C1 anomalies Posterior arch defects Anterior arch defects Bipartite atlas 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

All authors declare that they have no conflict of interest to report.

References

  1. 1.
    Sekhon LHS, Fehlings MG (2001) Epidemiology, demographics, and pathophysiology of acute spinal cord injury. Spine 26:S2–S12CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Allam E, Zhou Y (2015) Bipartite Atlas or Jefferson fracture? A case series and literature review. Spine 40:E661–E664CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    de Zoete A, Langeveld UA (2007) A congenital anomaly of the atlas as a diagnostic dilemma: a case report. J Manip Physiol Ther 30:62–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Petre BM, Karp JE, Riley LH (2012) Athletic cervical spine injury in the setting of fusion failure of the anterior and posterior atlas. Orthopedics 35:e1449–e1452CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Park Y, Kim SM, Lee YT et al (2014) Congenital anomaly of the atlas misdiagnosed as posterior arch fracture of the atlas and atlantoaxial subluxation. Clin Orthop Surg 6:96–100CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Klimo P Jr, Blumenthal DT, Couldwell WT (2003) Congenital partial aplasia of the posterior arch of the atlas causing myelopathy: case report and review of the literature. Spine 28:E224–E228PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Pasku D, Katonis P, Karantanas A, Hadjipavlou A (2007) Congenital posterior atlas defect associated with anterior rachischisis and early cervical degenerative disc disease: a case study and review of the literature. Acta Orthop Belg 73:282–285PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Thompson DNP (2013) Expert’s comment concerning Grand Rounds case entitled “Congenital C1 arch deficiency: Grand Round Presentation” (by M. Elmalky, S. Elsayed, G. Arealis, H. Mehdian doi:10.1007/s00586-013-2682-z). Eur Spine J 22:1227–1229CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Junewick JJ, Chin MS, Meesa IR (2011) Ossification patterns of the atlas vertebra. AJR Am J Roentgenol 197:1229–1234CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Karwacki GM, Schneider JF (2012) Normal ossification patterns of atlas and axis: a CT study. Am J Neuroradiol 33:1882–1887CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Currarino G, Rollins N, Diehl JT (1994) Congenital defects of the posterior arch of the atlas: a report of seven cases including an affected mother and son. Am J Neuroradiol 15:249–254PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hirano Y, Sugawara A, Mizuno J et al (2011) Spontaneous C1 anterior arch fracture as a postoperative complication of foramen magnum decompression for Chiari malformation type 1. Surg Neurol Int 2:138CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Park JS, Eun JP, Lee HO (2011) Anteroposterior spondyloschisis of atlas with bilateral cleft defect of posterior arch: a case report. Spine 36:E144–E147CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Logan WW, Stuard ID (1973) Absent posterior arch of the atlas. Am J Roentgenol Radium Ther Nucl Med 118:431–434CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Guenkel S, Schlaepfer S, Gordic S et al (2013) Incidence and variants of posterior arch defects of the atlas vertebra. Radiol Res Pract 2013:957280PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Senoglu M, Safavi-Abbasi S, Theodore N et al (2007) The frequency and clinical significance of congenital defects of the posterior and anterior arch of the atlas. J Neurosurg Spine 7:399–402CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kwon JK, Kim MS, Lee GJ (2009) The incidence and clinical implications of congenital defects of atlantal arch. J Korean Neurosurg Soc 466:522–527CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Sagiuchi T, Tachibana S, Sato K et al (2006) Lhermitte sign during yawning associated with congenital partial aplasia of the posterior arch of the atlas. Am J Neuroradiol 27:258–260PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    O’Sullivan AW, McManus F (2004) Occult congenital anomaly of the atlas presenting in the setting of acute trauma. Emerg Med J 21:639–640CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Sharma A, Gaikwad SB, Deol PS et al (2000) Partial aplasia of the posterior arch of the atlas with an isolated posterior arch remnant: findings in three cases. Am J Neuroradiol 21:1167–1171PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Png W, Hey HW, Mohan K et al (2015) Congenital absence of the posterior arch of the atlas with concomitant fusion to the axis: a case report. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong) 23:402–404CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Park SY, Kang DH, Lee CH et al (2006) Combined congenital anterior and posterior midline cleft of the atlas associated with asymptomatic lateral atlantoaxial subluxation. J Korean Neurosurg Soc 40:44–46Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Sanchis-Gimeno JA, Blanco-Perez E, Aparicio L et al (2014) Difficulties in distinguishing between an atlas fracture and a congenital posterior atlas arch defect in postmortem analysis. Forensic Sci Int 242:e1–e5CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of RadiologySaint Louis University School of MedicineSaint LouisUSA

Personalised recommendations