An international consensus on the appropriate evaluation and treatment for adults with spinal deformity

  • Sigurd H. Berven
  • Steven J. Kamper
  • Niccole M. Germscheid
  • Benny Dahl
  • Christopher I. Shaffrey
  • Lawrence G. Lenke
  • Stephen J. Lewis
  • Kenneth M. Cheung
  • Ahmet Alanay
  • Manabu Ito
  • David W. Polly
  • Yong Qiu
  • Marinus de Kleuver
  • AOSpine Knowledge Forum Deformity
Original Article

Abstract

Purpose

Evaluation and surgical management for adult spinal deformity (ASD) patients varies between health care providers. The purpose of this study is to identify appropriateness of specific approaches and management strategies for the treatment of ASD.

Methods

From January to July 2015, the AOSpine Knowledge Deformity Forum performed a modified Delphi survey where 53 experienced deformity surgeons from 24 countries, rated the appropriateness of management strategies for multiple ASD clinical scenarios. Four rounds were performed: three surveys and a face-to-face meeting. Consensus was achieved with ≥70% agreement.

Results

Appropriate surgical goals are improvement of function, pain, and neural symptoms. Appropriate preoperative patient evaluation includes recording information on history and comorbidities, and radiographic workup, including long standing films and MRI for all patients. Preoperative pulmonary and cardiac testing and DEXA scan is appropriate for at-risk patients. Intraoperatively, appropriate surgical strategies include long fusions with deformity correction for patients with large deformity and sagittal imbalance, and pelvic fixation for multilevel fusions with large curves, sagittal imbalance, and osteoporosis. Decompression alone is inappropriate in patients with large curves, sagittal imbalance, and progressive deformity. It is inappropriate to fuse to L5 in patients with symptomatic disk degeneration at L5–S1.

Conclusions

These results provide guidance for informed decision-making in the evaluation and management of ASD. Appropriate care for ASD, a very diverse spectrum of disease, must be responsive to patient preference and values, and considerations of the care provider, and the healthcare system. A monolithic approach to care should be avoided.

Keywords

Adult spinal deformity Surgery Appropriateness Consensus Delphi 

Supplementary material

586_2017_5241_MOESM1_ESM.docx (29 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 29 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Pellise F, Vila-Casademunt A, Ferrer M, Domingo-Sabat M, Bago J, Perez-Grueso FJ, Alanay A, Mannion AF, Acaroglu E, European Spine Study Group E (2015) Impact on health related quality of life of adult spinal deformity (ASD) compared with other chronic conditions. Eur Spine J 24:3–11. doi:10.1007/s00586-014-3542-1 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Waldrop R, Cheng J, Devin C, McGirt M, Fehlings M, Berven S (2015) The burden of spinal disorders in the elderly. Neurosurgery 77(Suppl 4):S46–S50. doi:10.1227/NEU.0000000000000950 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Cho KJ, Kim YT, Shin SH, Suk SI (2014) Surgical treatment of adult degenerative scoliosis. Asian Spine J 8:371–381. doi:10.4184/asj.2014.8.3.371 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Wang G, Hu J, Liu X, Cao Y (2015) Surgical treatments for degenerative lumbar scoliosis: a meta analysis. Eur Spine J 24:1792–1799. doi:10.1007/s00586-015-3942-x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Yadla S, Maltenfort MG, Ratliff JK, Harrop JS (2010) Adult scoliosis surgery outcomes: a systematic review. Neurosurg Focus 28:E3. doi:10.3171/2009.12.FOCUS09254 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Tribus CB (2003) Degenerative lumbar scoliosis: evaluation and management. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 11:174–183CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Everett CR, Patel RK (2007) A systematic literature review of nonsurgical treatment in adult scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 32:S130–S134. doi:10.1097/BRS.0b013e318134ea88 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Liang CZ, Li FC, Li H, Tao Y, Zhou X, Chen QX (2012) Surgery is an effective and reasonable treatment for degenerative scoliosis: a systematic review. J Int Med Res 40:399–405CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Aebi M (2005) The adult scoliosis. Eur Spine J 14:925–948. doi:10.1007/s00586-005-1053-9 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Berjano P, Lamartina C (2014) Classification of degenerative segment disease in adults with deformity of the lumbar or thoracolumbar spine. Eur Spine J 23:1815–1824. doi:10.1007/s00586-014-3219-9 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Faldini C, Di Martino A, De Fine M, Miscione MT, Calamelli C, Mazzotti A, Perna F (2013) Current classification systems for adult degenerative scoliosis. Musculoskelet Surg 97:1–8. doi:10.1007/s12306-013-0245-4 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Schwab F, Ungar B, Blondel B, Buchowski J, Coe J, Deinlein D, DeWald C, Mehdian H, Shaffrey C, Tribus C, Lafage V (2012) Scoliosis Research Society-Schwab Adult Spinal Deformity Classification: a validation study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 37:1077–1082. doi:10.1097/BRS.0b013e31823e15e2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Garber AM, Tunis SR (2009) Does comparative-effectiveness research threaten personalized medicine? N Engl J Med 360:1925–1927. doi:10.1056/NEJMp0901355 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Paulus MC, Kalantar SB, Radcliff K (2014) Cost and value of spinal deformity surgery. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 39:388–393. doi:10.1097/BRS.0000000000000150 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Fitch K, Bernstein SJ, Aguilar MD, Burnand B, LaCalle JR, Lazaro P, van het Loo M, McDonnell J, Vader J, Kahan JP (2001) The RAND/UCLA appropriateness method user’s manual. RAND Corporation, Santa MonicaGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Shekelle P (2004) The appropriateness method. Med Decis Mak 24:228–231. doi:10.1177/0272989X04264212 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    de Kleuver M, Lewis SJ, Germscheid NM, Kamper SJ, Alanay A, Berven SH, Cheung KM, Ito M, Lenke LG, Polly DW, Qiu Y, van Tulder M, Shaffrey C (2014) Optimal surgical care for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: an international consensus. Eur Spine J 23:2603–2618. doi:10.1007/s00586-014-3356-1 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Schwab F, Lafage V, Farcy JP, Bridwell K, Glassman S, Ondra S, Lowe T, Shainline M (2007) Surgical rates and operative outcome analysis in thoracolumbar and lumbar major adult scoliosis: application of the new adult deformity classification. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 32:2723–2730. doi:10.1097/BRS.0b013e31815a58f2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Bradford DS, Tay BK, Hu SS (1999) Adult scoliosis: surgical indications, operative management, complications, and outcomes. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 24:2617–2629CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Schwab F, Farcy JP, Bridwell K, Berven S, Glassman S, Harrast J, Horton W (2006) A clinical impact classification of scoliosis in the adult. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 31:2109–2114. doi:10.1097/01.brs.0000231725.38943.ab CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Smith JS, Lafage V, Shaffrey CI, Schwab F, Lafage R, Hostin R, O’Brien M, Boachie-Adjei O, Akbarnia BA, Mundis GM, Errico T, Kim HJ, Protopsaltis TS, Hamilton DK, Scheer JK, Sciubba D, Ailon T, Fu KM, Kelly MP, Zebala L, Line B, Klineberg E, Gupta M, Deviren V, Hart R, Burton D, Bess S, Ames CP, International Spine Study G (2016) Outcomes of operative and nonoperative treatment for adult spinal deformity: a prospective, multicenter, propensity-matched cohort assessment with minimum 2-year follow-up. Neurosurgery 78:851–861. doi:10.1227/NEU.0000000000001116 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Theis J, Gerdhem P, Abbott A (2015) Quality of life outcomes in surgically treated adult scoliosis patients: a systematic review. Eur Spine J 24:1343–1355. doi:10.1007/s00586-014-3593-3 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Pekmezci M, Berven SH, Hu SS, Deviren V (2009) The factors that play a role in the decision-making process of adult deformity patients. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 34:813–817. doi:10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181851ba6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Koller H, Pfanz C, Meier O, Hitzl W, Mayer M, Bullmann V, Schulte TL (2016) Factors influencing radiographic and clinical outcomes in adult scoliosis surgery: a study of 448 European patients. Eur Spine J 25:532–548. doi:10.1007/s00586-015-3898-x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Smith JS, Klineberg E, Schwab F, Shaffrey CI, Moal B, Ames CP, Hostin R, Fu KM, Burton D, Akbarnia B, Gupta M, Hart R, Bess S, Lafage V, International Spine Study G (2013) Change in classification grade by the SRS-Schwab Adult Spinal Deformity Classification predicts impact on health-related quality of life measures: prospective analysis of operative and nonoperative treatment. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 38:1663–1671. doi:10.1097/BRS.0b013e31829ec563 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Andersen T, Christensen FB, Laursen M, Hoy K, Hansen ES, Bunger C (2001) Smoking as a predictor of negative outcome in lumbar spinal fusion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 26:2623–2628CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Schairer WW, Carrer A, Deviren V, Hu SS, Takemoto S, Mummaneni P, Chou D, Ames C, Burch S, Tay B, Sawyer A, Berven SH (2013) Hospital readmission after spine fusion for adult spinal deformity. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 38:1681–1689. doi:10.1097/BRS.0b013e31829c08c9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Worley N, Marascalchi B, Jalai CM, Yang S, Diebo B, Vira S, Boniello A, Lafage V, Passias PG (2016) Predictors of inpatient morbidity and mortality in adult spinal deformity surgery. Eur Spine J 25:819–827. doi:10.1007/s00586-015-4104-x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Hu SS, Berven SH (2006) Preparing the adult deformity patient for spinal surgery. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 31:S126–S131. doi:10.1097/01.brs.0000234760.69549.79 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Glassman SD, Anagnost SC, Parker A, Burke D, Johnson JR, Dimar JR (2000) The effect of cigarette smoking and smoking cessation on spinal fusion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 25:2608–2615CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Malfair D, Flemming AK, Dvorak MF, Munk PL, Vertinsky AT, Heran MK, Graeb DA (2010) Radiographic evaluation of scoliosis: review. AJR Am J Roentgenol 194:S8–S22. doi:10.2214/AJR.07.7145 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Bess S, Schwab F, Lafage V, Shaffrey CI, Ames CP (2013) Classifications for adult spinal deformity and use of the Scoliosis Research Society-Schwab Adult Spinal Deformity Classification. Neurosurg Clin N Am 24:185–193. doi:10.1016/j.nec.2012.12.008 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Frazier DD, Lipson SJ, Fossel AH, Katz JN (1997) Associations between spinal deformity and outcomes after decompression for spinal stenosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 22:2025–2029CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Houten JK, Nasser R (2013) Symptomatic progression of degenerative scoliosis after decompression and limited fusion surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis. J Clin Neurosci 20:613–615. doi:10.1016/j.jocn.2012.06.002 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Kuhns CA, Bridwell KH, Lenke LG, Amor C, Lehman RA, Buchowski JM, Edwards C II, Christine B (2007) Thoracolumbar deformity arthrodesis stopping at L5: fate of the L5–S1 disc, minimum 5-year follow-up. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 32:2771–2776. doi:10.1097/BRS.0b013e31815a7ece CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Edwards CC 2nd, Bridwell KH, Patel A, Rinella AS, Berra A, Lenke LG (2004) Long adult deformity fusions to L5 and the sacrum. A matched cohort analysis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 29:1996–2005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Swamy G, Berven SH, Bradford DS (2007) The selection of L5 versus S1 in long fusions for adult idiopathic scoliosis. Neurosurg Clin N Am 18:281–288. doi:10.1016/j.nec.2007.01.010 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Jain A, Hassanzadeh H, Strike SA, Menga EN, Sponseller PD, Kebaish KM (2015) Pelvic fixation in adult and pediatric spine surgery: historical perspective, indications, and techniques: AAOS exhibit selection. J Bone Jt Surg Am 97:1521–1528. doi:10.2106/JBJS.O.00576 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Saer EH 3rd, Winter RB, Lonstein JE (1990) Long scoliosis fusion to the sacrum in adults with nonparalytic scoliosis. An improved method. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 15:650–653CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Shen FH, Mason JR, Shimer AL, Arlet VM (2013) Pelvic fixation for adult scoliosis. Eur Spine J 22(Suppl 2):S265–S275. doi:10.1007/s00586-012-2525-3 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Tsuchiya K, Bridwell KH, Kuklo TR, Lenke LG, Baldus C (2006) Minimum 5-year analysis of L5–S1 fusion using sacropelvic fixation (bilateral S1 and iliac screws) for spinal deformity. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 31:303–308. doi:10.1097/01.brs.0000197193.81296.f1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Annis P, Lawrence BD, Spiker WR, Zhang Y, Chen W, Daubs MD, Brodke DS (2014) Predictive factors for acute proximal junctional failure after adult deformity surgery with upper instrumented vertebrae in the thoracolumbar spine. Evid Based Spine Care J 5:160–162. doi:10.1055/s-0034-1386755 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Barbanti Brodano G, Terzi S, Gasbarrini A, Bandiera S, Simoes C, Boriani S (2013) Do benefits overcome the risks related to surgery for adult scoliosis? A detailed analysis of a consecutive case series. Eur Spine J 22(Suppl 6):S795–S802. doi:10.1007/s00586-013-3031-y CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Rahman RK, Buchowski JM, Stephens B, Dorward IG, Koester LA, Bridwell KH (2013) Comparison of TLIF with rhBMP-2 versus no TLIF and higher posterolateral rhBMP-2 dose at L5–S1 for long fusions to the sacrum with sacropelvic fixation in patients with primary adult deformity. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 38:2264–2271. doi:10.1097/BRS.0000000000000045 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Ha Y, Maruo K, Racine L, Schairer WW, Hu SS, Deviren V, Burch S, Tay B, Chou D, Mummaneni PV, Ames CP, Berven SH (2013) Proximal junctional kyphosis and clinical outcomes in adult spinal deformity surgery with fusion from the thoracic spine to the sacrum: a comparison of proximal and distal upper instrumented vertebrae. J Neurosurg Spine 19:360–369. doi:10.3171/2013.5.SPINE12737 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Maruo K, Ha Y, Inoue S, Samuel S, Okada E, Hu SS, Deviren V, Burch S, William S, Ames CP, Mummaneni PV, Chou D, Berven SH (2013) Predictive factors for proximal junctional kyphosis in long fusions to the sacrum in adult spinal deformity. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 38:E1469–E1476. doi:10.1097/BRS.0b013e3182a51d43 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    O’Shaughnessy BA, Bridwell KH, Lenke LG, Cho W, Baldus C, Chang MS, Auerbach JD, Crawford CH (2012) Does a long-fusion “T3-sacrum” portend a worse outcome than a short-fusion “T10-sacrum” in primary surgery for adult scoliosis? Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 37:884–890. doi:10.1097/BRS.0b013e3182376414 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Fujimori T, Inoue S, Le H, Schairer WW, Berven SH, Tay BK, Deviren V, Burch S, Iwasaki M, Hu SS (2014) Long fusion from sacrum to thoracic spine for adult spinal deformity with sagittal imbalance: upper versus lower thoracic spine as site of upper instrumented vertebra. Neurosurg Focus 36:E9. doi:10.3171/2014.3.FOCUS13541 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Dorward IG, Lenke LG, Stoker GE, Cho W, Koester LA, Sides BA (2014) Radiographic and clinical outcomes of posterior column osteotomies in spinal deformity correction. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). doi:10.1097/BRS.0000000000000302 Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    La Maida GA, Luceri F, Gallozzi F, Ferraro M, Bernardo M (2015) Complication rate in adult deformity surgical treatment: safety of the posterior osteotomies. Eur Spine J 24(Suppl 7):879–886. doi:10.1007/s00586-015-4275-5 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Lenke LG, Fehlings MG, Shaffrey CI, Cheung KM, Carreon L, Dekutoski MB, Schwab FJ, Boachie-Adjei O, Kebaish KM, Ames CP, Qiu Y, Matsuyama Y, Dahl BT, Mehdian H, Pellise-Urquiza F, Lewis SJ, Berven SH (2016) Neurologic outcomes of complex adult spinal deformity surgery: results of the prospective, multicenter Scoli-RISK-1 study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 41:204–212. doi:10.1097/BRS.0000000000001338 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Smith JS, Klineberg E, Lafage V, Shaffrey CI, Schwab F, Lafage R, Hostin R, Mundis GM Jr, Errico TJ, Kim HJ, Protopsaltis TS, Hamilton DK, Scheer JK, Soroceanu A, Kelly MP, Line B, Gupta M, Deviren V, Hart R, Burton DC, Bess S, Ames CP, International Spine Study G (2016) Prospective multicenter assessment of perioperative and minimum 2-year postoperative complication rates associated with adult spinal deformity surgery. J Neurosurg Spine 25:1–14. doi:10.3171/2015.11.SPINE151036 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Dearborn JT, Hu SS, Tribus CB, Bradford DS (1999) Thromboembolic complications after major thoracolumbar spine surgery. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 24:1471–1476CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Rojas-Tomba F, Gormaz-Talavera I, Menendez-Quintanilla IE, Moriel-Duran J, Garcia de Quevedo-Puerta D, Villanueva-Pareja F (2016) Incidence and risk factors of venous thromboembolism in major spinal surgery with no chemical or mechanical prophylaxis. Rev Esp Cir Ortop Traumatol 60:133–140. doi:10.1016/j.recot.2015.10.002 PubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Fabricant PD, Admoni S, Green DW, Ipp LS, Widmann RF (2012) Return to athletic activity after posterior spinal fusion for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: analysis of independent predictors. J Pediatr Orthop 32:259–265. doi:10.1097/BPO.0b013e31824b285f CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Tarrant RC, O’Loughlin PF, Lynch S, Queally JM, Sheeran P, Moore DP, Kiely PJ (2014) Timing and predictors of return to short-term functional activity in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis after posterior spinal fusion: a prospective study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 39:1471–1478. doi:10.1097/BRS.0000000000000452 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Green BN, Johnson C, Moreau W (2009) Is physical activity contraindicated for individuals with scoliosis? A systematic literature review. J Chiropr Med 8:25–37. doi:10.1016/j.jcm.2008.11.001 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Acaroglu E, Yavuz AC, Guler UO, Yuksel S, Yavuz Y, Domingo-Sabat M, Pellise F, Alanay A, Perez Grueso FS, Kleinstück F, Obeid I (2016) A decision analysis to identify the ideal treatment for adult spinal deformity: is surgery better than non-surgical treatment in improving health-related quality of life and decreasing the disease burden? European Spine Study Group. Eur Spine J 25(8):2390–2400CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Acaroglu E, Guler UO, Cetinyurek-Yavuz A, Yuksel S, Yavuz Y, Ayhan S, Domingo-Sabat M, Pellise F, Alanay A, Perez Grueso FS, Kleinstück F, Obeid I, European Spine Study Group (2017) Decision analysis to identify the ideal treatment for adult spinal deformity: What is the impact of complications on treatment outcomes? Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc 51(3):181–190Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sigurd H. Berven
    • 1
  • Steven J. Kamper
    • 2
  • Niccole M. Germscheid
    • 3
  • Benny Dahl
    • 4
  • Christopher I. Shaffrey
    • 5
  • Lawrence G. Lenke
    • 6
  • Stephen J. Lewis
    • 7
  • Kenneth M. Cheung
    • 8
  • Ahmet Alanay
    • 9
  • Manabu Ito
    • 10
  • David W. Polly
    • 11
  • Yong Qiu
    • 12
  • Marinus de Kleuver
    • 13
  • AOSpine Knowledge Forum Deformity
  1. 1.Department of Orthopaedic SurgeryUniversity of California San FranciscoSan FranciscoUSA
  2. 2.Musculoskeletal DivisionThe George Institute for Global HealthSydneyAustralia
  3. 3.Research DepartmentAOSpine InternationalDavosSwitzerland
  4. 4.Spine Unit, Department of Orthopedic SurgeryRigshospitalet and University of CopenhagenCopenhagenDenmark
  5. 5.Department of Neurosurgery and Orthopaedic SurgeryUniversity of VirginiaCharlottesvilleUSA
  6. 6.Department of Orthopedic SurgeryColumbia University College of Physicians and SurgeonsNew YorkUSA
  7. 7.Department of SurgeryToronto Western HospitalTorontoCanada
  8. 8.Department of Orthopaedics and TraumatologyThe University of Hong KongHong KongChina
  9. 9.Faculty of MedicineAcibadem UniversityIstanbulTurkey
  10. 10.Department of Orthopedic SurgeryNational Hospital Organization Hokkaido Medical CenterSapporoJapan
  11. 11.Department of Orthopaedic SurgeryUniversity of MinnesotaMinneapolisUSA
  12. 12.Department of Spine SurgeryThe Affiliated Drum Tower Hospital of Nanjing University Medical SchoolNanjingChina
  13. 13.Department of OrthopedicsRadboud University Medical CenterNijmegenThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations