Are computer numerical control (CNC)-manufactured patient-specific metal templates available for posterior thoracic pedicle screw insertion? Feasibility and accuracy evaluation
Accurate and safe posterior thoracic pedicle insertion (PTPI) remains a challenge. Patient-specific drill templates (PDTs) created by rapid prototyping (RP) can assist in posterior thoracic pedicle insertion, but pose biocompatibility risks. The aims of this study were to develop alternative PDTs with computer numerical control (CNC) and assess their feasibility and accuracy in assisting PTPI.
Preoperative CT images of 31 cadaveric thoracic vertebras were obtained and then the optimal pedicle screw trajectories were planned. The PDTs with optimal screw trajectories were randomly assigned to be designed and manufactured by CNC or RP in each vertebra. With the guide of the CNC- or RP-manufactured PDTs, the appropriate screws were inserted into the pedicles. Postoperative CT scans were performed to analyze any deviations at entry point and midpoint of the pedicles.
The CNC group was found to be significant manufacture-time-shortening, and cost-decreasing, when compared with the RP group (P < 0.01). The PDTs fitted the vertebral laminates well while all screws were being inserted into the pedicles. There were no significant differences in absolute deviations at entry point and midpoint of the pedicle on either axial or sagittal planes (P > 0.05). The screw positions were grade 0 in 90.3% and grade 1 in 9.7% of the cases in the CNC group and grade 0 in 93.5% and grade 1 in 6.5% of the cases in the RP group (P = 0.641).
CNC-manufactured PDTs are viable for assisting in PTPI with good feasibility and accuracy.
KeywordsPatient-specific drill templates Computer numerical control Rapid prototyping Thoracic spine Pedicle
Compliance with ethical standards
This work was partly supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) (61190122, 61190123) and Guangdong and Guangzhou provincial scientific and technique department (2014A020212200, 2015A040404022, 2015B010125006, 2015B010125005, 201704020129, 201704020069).
Conflict of interest
The authors report no conflict of interest concerning the materials or methods used in this study or the findings specified in this paper.
- 12.Lee CH, Hyun SJ, Kim YJ, Kim KJ, Jahng TA, Kim HJ (2014) Accuracy of free hand pedicle screw installation in the thoracic and lumbar spine by a young surgeon: an analysis of the first consecutive 306 screws using computed tomography. Asian Spine J 8:237–243. doi: 10.4184/asj.2014.8.3.237 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 13.Austin MS, Vaccaro AR, Brislin B, Nachwalter R, Hilibrand AS, Albert TJ (2002) Image-guided spine surgery: a cadaver study comparing conventional open laminoforaminotomy and two image-guided techniques for pedicle screw placement in posterolateral fusion and nonfusion models. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 27:2503–2508. doi: 10.1097/01.BRS.0000031274.34509.1E CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 14.Lee CY, Wu MH, Li YY, Cheng CC, Hsu CH, Huang TJ, Hsu RW (2015) Intraoperative computed tomography navigation for transpedicular screw fixation to treat unstable thoracic and lumbar spine fractures: clinical analysis of a case series (CARE-compliant). Medicine (Baltimore) 94:e757. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000000757 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 18.Nyheim T, Staxrud LE, Jorgensen JJ, Jensen K, Olerud HM, Sandbaek G (2017) Radiation exposure in patients treated with endovascular aneurysm repair: what is the risk of cancer, and can we justify treating younger patients? Acta Radiol 58:323–330. doi: 10.1177/0284185116651002 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 23.Fu M, Lin L, Kong X, Zhao W, Tang L, Li J, Ouyang J (2013) Construction and accuracy assessment of patient-specific biocompatible drill template for cervical anterior transpedicular screw (ATPS) insertion: an in vitro study. PLoS One 8:e53580. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0053580 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 25.Farshad M, Betz M, Farshad-Amacker NA, Moser M (2017) Accuracy of patient-specific template-guided vs. free-hand fluoroscopically controlled pedicle screw placement in the thoracic and lumbar spine: a randomized cadaveric study. Eur Spine J 26:738–749. doi: 10.1007/s00586-016-4728-5 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 29.Putzier M, Strube P, Cecchinato R, Lamartina C, Hoff EK (2017) A new navigational tool for pedicle screw placement in patients with severe scoliosis a pilot study to prove feasibility, accuracy, and identify operative challenges. Clin Spine Surg 30:E430–E439. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0000000000000220 PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 30.Takemoto M, Fujibayashi S, Ota E, Otsuki B, Kimura H, Sakamoto T, Kawai T, Futami T, Sasaki K, Matsushita T, Nakamura T, Neo M, Matsuda S (2015) Additive-manufactured patient-specific titanium templates for thoracic pedicle screw placement: novel design with reduced contact area. Eur Spine J. doi: 10.1007/s00586-015-3908-z Google Scholar
- 32.Shin MH, Ryu KS, Park CK (2012) Accuracy and safety in pedicle screw placement in the thoracic and lumbar spines: comparison study between conventional C-Arm fluoroscopy and navigation coupled with O-arm (R) guided methods. J Korean Neurosurg Soc 52:204–209. doi: 10.3340/jkns.2012.52.3.204 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 34.Samdani AF, Ranade A, Sciubba DM, Cahill PJ, Antonacci MD, Clements DH, Betz RR (2010) Accuracy of free-hand placement of thoracic pedicle screws in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: how much of a difference does surgeon experience make? Eur Spine J 19:91–95. doi: 10.1007/s00586-009-1183-6 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 39.Hu Y, Yuan ZS, Spiker WR, Albert TJ, Dong WX, Xie H, Yuan JB, Wang CT (2013) Deviation analysis of C2 translaminar screw placement assisted by a novel rapid prototyping drill template: a cadaveric study. Eur Spine J 22:2770–2776. doi: 10.1007/s00586-013-2993-0 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar