Advertisement

European Spine Journal

, Volume 26, Issue 9, pp 2450–2458 | Cite as

Clinical and radiological outcomes of two-level endoscopic posterior cervical foraminotomy

  • Myung Soo Youn
  • Myeong Hwan Shon
  • Yoon Jae Seong
  • Jong Ki Shin
  • Tae Sik Goh
  • Jung Sub Lee
Original Article

Abstract

Purpose

The efficacy and safety of endoscopic posterior cervical foraminotomy (EPCF) have been demonstrated for single-level cervical radiculopathy, but no report in the medical literature has described the clinical results of two-level EPCF. The aim of this study was to assess the clinical and radiological outcomes of two-level EPCF performed in patients with cervical radiculopathy.

Methods

Twenty-two consecutive patients (9 females and 13 males) that underwent two-level EPCF with cervical radiculopathy from January 2012 to January 2014 were included in this study. Clinical outcomes were assessed before surgery and at 1, 3, 6, 12, and 24 months postoperatively using visual analogue scale for neck and arm, neck pain and disability scale (NPDS), and neck disability index (NDI) scores. Radiological outcomes were assessed by measuring segmental lordosis (SL), C2–7 lordosis, and disc height index (DHI) before surgery and at 12 and 24 months postoperatively.

Results

Mean VAS, NPDS, and NDI scores were significant improved at 1 month postoperatively versus preoperative values and these improvements were maintained at 2 years after surgery. SL and C2–7 lordosis were significantly increased after surgery, and no instability in dynamic view was observed during the 2-year follow-up period. Percentage DHIs of operated discs were also maintained without significant change at 2 years after surgery. One patient suffered from transient motor palsy due to root retraction.

Conclusions

Two-level EPCF can be safely preformed and should be considered an alternative to two-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion or open posterior cervical foraminotomy in selected patients.

Keywords

Two level Endoscopic Posterior cervical foraminotomy 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

This research was supported by the Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Education (NRF-2015R1D1A1A01059035).

References

  1. 1.
    Ahn Y, Lee SH, Shin SW (2005) Percutaneous endoscopic cervical discectomy: clinical outcome and radiographic changes. Photomed Laser Surg 23:362–368CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bohlman HH, Emery SE, Goodfellow DB, Jones PK (1993) Robinson anterior cervical discectomy and arthrodesis for cervical radiculopathy. Long-term follow-up of one hundred and twenty-two patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am 75:1298–1307CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bydon M, Mathios D, Macki M, de la Garza-Ramos R, Sciubba DM, Witham TF, Wolinsky JP, Gokaslan ZL, Bydon A (2014) Long-term patient outcomes after posterior cervical foraminotomy: an analysis of 151 cases. J Neurosurg Spine 21:727–731CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Caglar YS, Bozkurt M, Kahilogullari G, Tuna H, Bakir A, Torun F, Ugur HC (2007) Keyhole approach for posterior cervical discectomy: experience on 84 patients. Minim Invasive Neurosurg 50:7–11CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Clarke MJ, Ecker RD, Krauss WE, McClelland RI, Dekutoski MB (2007) Same segment and adjacent-segment disease following posterior cervical foraminotomy. J Neurosurg Spine 6:5–9CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Fraser JF, Hartl R (2007) Anterior approaches to fusion of the cervical spine: a meta-analysis of fusion rates. J Neurosurg Spine 6:298–303CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Frykholm R (1947) Deformities of dural pouches and strictures of dural sheaths in the cervical region producing nerve-root compression; contribution to the etiology and operative treatment of brachial neuralgia. J Neurosurg 4:403–413CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Holly LT, Moftakhar P, Khoo LT, Wang JC, Shamie N (2007) Minimally invasive 2-level posterior cervical foraminotomy: preliminary clinical results. J Spinal Disord Tech 20(1):20–24CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hosono N, Yonenobu K, Ono K (1996) Neck and shoulder pain after laminoplasty. A noticeable complication. Spine 21:1969–1973CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Inoue H, Ohmori K, Miyasaka K, Hosoe H (1999) Radiographic evaluation of the lumbosacral disc height. Skelet Radiol 28:638–643CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Jagannathan J, Sherman JH, Szabo T, Sahffrey CI, Jane JA (2009) The posterior cervical foraminotomy in the treatment of cervical disc/osteophyte disease: a single surgeon experience with a minimum of 5 years’ clinical and radiographic follow-up. J Neurosurg Spine 10:347–356CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kim CH, Kim KT, Chung CK, Park SB, Yang SH, Kim SM, Sung JK (2015) Minimally invasive cervical foraminotomy and discectomy for laterally located soft disk herniation. Eur Spine J 24:3005–3012CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Lawton CD, Smith ZA, Lam SK, Habib A, Wong RH, Fessler RG (2014) Clinical outcomes of microendoscopic foraminotomy and decompression in the cervical spine. World Neurosurg 81:422–427CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lee JH, Lee SH (2014) Clinical and radiographic changes after percutaneous endoscopic cervical discectomy: a long-term follow up. Photomed Laser Surg 32:663–668CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Lee JS, Suh KT, Kim JI, Lee HS, Goh TS (2013) Validation of the Korean version of the neck pain and disability scale. Asian Spine J 7:178–183CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Maiman DJ, Kumaresan S, Yoganandan N, Pintar FA (1999) Biomechanical effect of anterior cervical spine fusion on adjacent segments. Biomed Mater Eng 9:27–38PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Park MS, Moon SH, Lee HM, Kim TH, Oh JK, Lee SY, Oh JB, Riew KD (2015) Diagnostic value of oblique magnetic resonance images for evaluating cervical foraminal stenosis. Spine J 15:607–611CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Pedram M, Castagnera L, Carat X, Macouillard G, Vital JM (2003) Pharyngolaryngeal lesions in patients undergoing cervical spine surgery through the anterior approach: contribution of methylprednisolone. Eur Spine J 12:84–90CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Riew KD, Cheng I, Pimenta L, Taylor B (2007) Posterior cervical spine surgery for radiculopathy. Neurosurgery 60:S57–S63CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Ruetten S, Komp M, Merk H, Godolias G (2007) A new full-endoscopic technique for cervical posterior foraminotomy in the treatment of lateral disc herniations using 6.9-mm endoscopes: prospective 2-year results of 87 patients. Minim Invasive Neurosurg 50:219–226CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Scoville WB, Dohrmann GJ, Corkill G (1976) Late results of cervical disc surgery. J Neurosurg 45:203–210CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Shim JH, Park CK, Lee JH, Choi JW, Lee DC, Lim DH, Kim JK, Hwang JH (2009) A comparison of angled sagittal MRI and conventional MRI in the diagnosis of herniated disc and stenosis in the cervical foramen. Eur Spine J 18:1109–1116CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Shiraishi T, Kato M, Yato Y, Ueda S, Aoyama R, Yamane J, Kitamura K (2012) New techniques for exposure of posterior cervical spine through intermuscular planes and their surgical application. Spine 37:E286–E296CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Skovrlj B, Gologorsky Y, Haque R, Fessler RG, Qureshi SA (2014) Complications, outcomes, and need for fusion after minimally invasive posterior cervical foraminotomy and microdiscectomy. Spine J 14:2405–2411CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Song KJ, Choi BW, Choi BR, Seo GB (2010) Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Korean version of the neck disability index. Spine 35:E1045–E1049CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Terai H, Suzuki A, Toyoda H, Yasuda H, Kaneda K, Katsutani H, Nakamura H (2014) Tandem keyhole foraminotomy in the treatment of cervical radiculopathy: retrospective review of 35 cases. J Orthop Surg Res 9:38CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Toksoy A, Bektas F, Eken C, Ceken K, Cete Y (2010) Value of the swimming position and arm traction in visualizing the cervicothoracic junction over the standard lateral cervical X-ray. Int J Emerg Med 3:85–90CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Tschugg A, Neururer S, Scheufler KM, Ulmer H, Thome C, Hegewald AA (2014) Comparison of posterior foraminotomy and anterior foraminotomy with fusion for treating spondylotic foraminal stenosis of the cervical spine: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial (ForaC). Trials 15:437CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Villavicencio AT, Pushchak E, Burneikiene S, Thramann JJ (2007) The safety of instrumented outpatient anterior cervical discectomy and fusion. Spine J 7:148–153CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Wang MC, Chan L, Maiman DJ, Kreuter W, Deyo RA (2007) Complications and mortality associated with cervical spine surgery for degenerative disease in the United States. Spine 32:342–347CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Yang JS, Chu L, Chen L, Chen F, Ke ZY, Deng ZL (2014) Anterior or posterior approach of full-endoscopic cervical discectomy for cervical intervertebral disc herniation? A comparative cohort study. Spine 39:1743–1750CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Zdeblick TA, Zou D, Warden KE, McCabe R, Kunz D, Vanderby R (1992) Cervical stability after foraminotomy. A biomechanical in vitro analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 74:22–27CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Myung Soo Youn
    • 1
  • Myeong Hwan Shon
    • 1
  • Yoon Jae Seong
    • 1
  • Jong Ki Shin
    • 2
  • Tae Sik Goh
    • 2
  • Jung Sub Lee
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Orthopaedic SurgeryMyungeun HospitalBusanRepublic of Korea
  2. 2.Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Medical Research InstitutePusan National University School of MedicineBusanRepublic of Korea

Personalised recommendations