Advertisement

European Spine Journal

, Volume 26, Issue 9, pp 2258–2266 | Cite as

Locking stand-alone cages versus anterior plate constructs in single-level fusion for degenerative cervical disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis

  • Mithun NambiarEmail author
  • Kevin Phan
  • John Edward Cunningham
  • Yi Yang
  • Peter Lawrence Turner
  • Ralph Mobbs
Review Article

Abstract

Purpose

To conduct a meta-analysis to compare the clinical and radiological outcomes in single-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) surgery for degenerative cervical disease performed by either single-level locking stand-alone cage (LSC) or anterior plate construct (APC).

Methods

We performed a comprehensive database search of Medline, PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews according to PRISMA guidelines and identified six articles that satisfied our inclusion criteria. We excluded all non-English language articles and articles which did not directly compare LSC and APC. Only papers which focussed on single-level ACDF were included in the study.

Results

There were no significant differences in blood loss, clinical outcomes (JOA, VAS, NDI scores) or radiological outcomes (cervical lordosis, segmental Cobb angle, subsidence and fusion) between the two groups. Operative time was significantly shorter in the LSC group (MD 7.2 min, 95% CI 0.3–14.1, p = 0.04). APC was associated with a statistically significant increase in dysphagia in the follow-up period (OR 6.2, 95% CI 1.0–36.6, p = 0.05).

Conclusion

LSC and APC have similar clinical and radiological outcomes. Further blinded randomised trials are required to establish conclusive evidence in favour of LSC with regards to minimising post-operative dysphagia. We also encourage future studies to make use of formalised dysphagia outcome measures in reporting complications.

Keywords

Stand-alone Zero-profile ACDF Cervical Plate 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

There was no funding for this research.

References

  1. 1.
    Smith GW, Robinson RA (1958) The treatment of certain cervical-spine disorders by anterior removal of the intervertebral disc and interbody fusion. J Bone Jt Surg Am 40A:607–624Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Lee MJ, Bazaz R, Furey CG, Yoo J (2005) Influence of anterior cervical plate design on dysphagia: a 2-year prospective longitudinal follow-up study. J Spinal Disord Tech 18:406–409CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Fountas KN, Kapsalaki EZ, Nikolakakos LG, Smisson HF, Johnston KW, Grigorian AA, Lee GP, Robinson JS Jr (2007) Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion associated complications. Spine 32:2310–2317CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Lee YS, Kim YB, Park SW (2015) Does a zero-profile anchored cage offer additional stabilization as anterior cervical plate? Spine 40:E563–E570. doi: 10.1097/brs.0000000000000864 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Scholz M, Schleicher P, Pabst S, Kandziora F (2015) A zero-profile anchored spacer in multilevel cervical anterior interbody fusion: biomechanical comparison to established fixation techniques. Spine 40:E375–E380. doi: 10.1097/brs.0000000000000768 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hoffstetter CP, Kesavabhotla K, Boockvar JA (2015) Zero-profile anchored spacer reduces rate of dysphagia compared with ACDF with anterior plating. J Spinal Disord Tech 28:E284–E290CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG; PRISMA Group (2009) Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med 6:e1000097CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Phan K, Mobbs RJ (2015) Systematic reviews and meta-analyses in spine surgery, neurosurgery and orthopedics: guidelines for the surgeon scientist. J Spine Surg 1:19–27PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Stroup DF, Berlin JA, Morton SC, Olkin I, Williamson GD, Rennie D, Moher D, Becker BJ, Sipe TA, Thacker SB (2000) Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology: a proposal for reporting. Meta-analysis Of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) group. JAMA 283:2008–2012CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Nemoto O, Kitada A, Naitou S, Tachibana A, Ito Y, Fujikawa A (2015) Stand-alone anchored cage versus cage with plating for single-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: a prospective, randomized, controlled study with a 2-year follow-up. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 25(Suppl 1):S127–S134. doi: 10.1007/s00590-014-1547-4 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Shin JS, Oh SH, Cho PG (2014) Surgical outcome of a zero-profile device comparing with stand-alone cage and anterior cervical plate with iliac bone graft in the anterior cervical discectomy and fusion. Korean J Spine 11:169–177. doi: 10.14245/kjs.2014.11.3.169 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Son DK, Son DW, Kim HS, Sung SK, Lee SW, Song GS (2014) Comparative study of clinical and radiological outcomes of a zero-profile device concerning reduced postoperative dysphagia after single level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion. J Korean Neurosurg Soc 56:103–107. doi: 10.3340/jkns.2014.56.2.103 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Wang Z, Zhu R, Yang H, Shen M, Wang G, Chen K, Gan M, Li M (2015) Zero-profile implant (Zero-p) versus plate cage Benezech implant (PCB) in the treatment of single-level cervical spondylotic myelopathy. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 16:290. doi: 10.1186/s12891-015-0746-4 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Tabaraee E, Ahn J, Bohl DD, Collins MJ, Massel DH, Aboushaala K, Singh K (2016) Comparison of surgical outcomes, narcotics utilization, and costs after an anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: stand-alone cage versus anterior plating. Clin Spine Surg. doi: 10.1097/bsd.0000000000000341 Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Shao H, Chen J, Ru B, Yan F, Zhang J, Xu S, Huang Y (2015) Zero-profile implant versus conventional cage-plate implant in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion for the treatment of degenerative cervical spondylosis: a meta-analysis. J Orthop Surg Res 10:148. doi: 10.1186/s13018-015-0290-9 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Liu W, Hu L, Wang J, Liu M, Wang X (2015) Comparison of zero-profile anchored spacer versus plate-cage construct in treatment of cervical spondylosis with regard to clinical outcomes and incidence of major complications: a meta-analysis. Ther Clin Risk Manag 11:1437–1447. doi: 10.2147/tcrm.s92511 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Dong J, Lu M, Lu T, Liang B, Xu J, Zhou J, Lv H, Qin J, Cai X, Huang S, Li H, Wang D, He X (2015) Meta-analysis comparing zero-profile spacer and anterior plate in anterior cervical fusion. PLoS One 10:e0130223CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Pruijs JE, Hageman MA, Keessen W, van der Meer R, van Wieringen JC (1994) Variation in Cobb angle measurements in scoliosis. Skelet Radiol 23:517–520CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Scholz M, Reyes PM, Schleicher P, Sawa AG, Baek S, Kandziora F, Marciano FF, Crawford NR (2009) A new stand-alone cervical anterior interbody fusion device: biomechanical comparison with established anterior cervical fixation devices. Spine 34:156–160CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Nayak AN, Stein MI, James CR, Gaskins 3rd RB, Cabezas AF, Adu-Lartey M, Castellvi AE, Santoni BG (2014) Biomechanical analysis of an interbody cage with three integrated cancellous lag screws in a two-level cervical spine fusion construct: an in vitro study. Spine J 14:3002–3010Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Paik H, Kang DG, Lehman RA Jr, Cardoso MJ, Gaume RE, Ambati DV, Dmitriev AE (2014) Do stand-alone interbody spacers with integrated screws provide adequate segmental stability for multilevel cervical arthrodesis? Spine J 14:1740–1747CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Shi S, Liu ZD, Li XF, Qian L, Zhong GB, Chen FJ (2015) Comparison of plate-cage construct and stand-alone anchored spacer in the surgical treatment of three-level cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a preliminary clinical study. Spine J 15:1973–1980. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2015.04.024 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Bazaz R, Lee MJ, Yoo JU (2002) Incidence of dysphagia after anterior cervical spine surgery: a prospective study. Spine 27:2453–2458CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mithun Nambiar
    • 1
    Email author
  • Kevin Phan
    • 2
  • John Edward Cunningham
    • 1
  • Yi Yang
    • 1
  • Peter Lawrence Turner
    • 1
  • Ralph Mobbs
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of OrthopaedicsThe Royal Melbourne HospitalMelbourneAustralia
  2. 2.Neuro Spine Surgery Research GroupPrince of Wales Private HospitalRandwickAustralia

Personalised recommendations