Experimental validation of a patient-specific model of orthotic action in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis
Personalized modeling of brace action has potential in improving brace efficacy in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). Model validation and simulation uncertainty are rarely addressed, limiting the clinical implementation of personalized models. We hypothesized that a thorough validation of a personalized finite element model (FEM) of brace action would highlight potential means of improving the model.
Forty-two AIS patients were included retrospectively and prospectively. Personalized FEMs of pelvis, spine and ribcage were built from stereoradiographies. Brace action was simulated through soft cylindrical pads acting on the ribcage and through displacements applied to key vertebrae. Simulation root mean squared errors (RMSEs) were calculated by comparison with the actual brace action (quantified through clinical indices, vertebral positions and orientations) observed in in-brace stereoradiographies.
Simulation RMSEs of Cobb angle and vertebral apical axial rotation was lower than measurement uncertainty in 79 % of the patients. Pooling all patients and clinical indices, 87 % of the indices had lower RMSEs than the measurement uncertainty.
In-depth analysis suggests that personalization of spinal functional units mechanical properties could improve the simulation’s accuracy, but the model gave good results, thus justifying further research on its clinical application.
KeywordsFinite element model Spine deformity Brace Pediatrics
The authors are grateful to the ParisTech BiomecAM chair program on subject-specific musculoskeletal modeling (with the support of ParisTech and Yves Cotrel Foundations, Société Générale, Proteor and Covea) and to the “Investissements d’Avenir” program for funding the CORSIN Project, in collaboration between Proteor and our institution. We would also like to thank Ms Sonia Simoes for her technical help.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
No conflict of interest to disclose.
- 1.Dubousset J (1994) Three-dimensional analysis of the scoliotic deformity. In: Weinstein SL (ed) The pediatric spine: principles and practice. Raven Press Ltd, New yorkGoogle Scholar
- 10.Cobetto N, Aubin CE, Clin J, Le May S, Desbiens-Blais F, Labelle H, Parent S (2014) Braces optimized with computer-assisted design and simulations are lighter, more comfortable, and more efficient than plaster-cast braces for the treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine Deform 2:276–284. doi: 10.1016/j.jspd.2014.03.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 13.Vergari C, Ribes G, Aubert B, Adam C, Miladi L, Ilharreborde B, Abelin-Genevois K, Rouch P, Skalli W (2015) Evaluation of a patient-specific finite element model to simulate conservative treatment in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine Deform 3:4–11. doi: 10.1016/j.jspd.2014.06.014 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 14.Steffen JS, Obeid I, Aurouer N, Hauger O, Vital JM, Dubousset J, Skalli W (2010) 3-D postural balance with regard to gravity line: an evaluation in the transversal plane on 93 patients and 23 asymptomatic volunteers. Eur Spine J 19:760–767. doi: 10.1007/s00586-009-1249-5 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 16.Descrimes JL, Aubin CE, Skalli W, Zeller R, Danserau J, Lavaste F (1995) Introduction des facettes articulaires dans une modélisation par éléments finis de la colonne vertébrale et du thorax scoliotique: aspects mécaniques. Rachis 7:301–314Google Scholar