Decompression of the gluteus medius muscle as a new treatment for buttock pain: technical note
The clinical features and etiology of low back pain and buttock pain remain poorly understood. We report ten patients with buttock pain who underwent gluteus medius muscle (GMeM) decompression under local anesthesia.
Between December 2012 and November 2013 we surgically treated ten patients (four men, six women; mean age 65.1 years) for buttock pain. The affected side was unilateral in seven and bilateral in three patients (total sites, n = 13). The interval from symptom onset to treatment averaged 174 months; the mean postoperative follow-up period was 24 months. Decompression of the tight gluteal aponeurosis over the GMeM was performed under local anesthesia. Assessment of the clinical outcomes was on the numeric rating scale (NRS) for low back pain (LBP), the Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) score, and the Roland–Morris Disability Questionnaire (RDQ) score before and at the latest follow-up after treatment.
There were no intraoperative surgery-related complications. The buttock pain of all patients was improved after surgery; their NRS decreased from 7.0 to 0.8 and JOA and RMDQ scores indicated significant improvement (p < 0.05).
In patients with buttock pain, pain around the GMeM should be considered as a causative factor. Less invasive surgery with cutting and opening of the tight gluteal aponeurosis over the GMeM under local anesthesia yielded excellent clinical outcomes.
KeywordsButtock pain Decompression Gluteal aponeurosis Gluteus medius muscle Less invasive surgery Low back pain
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
We have no conflicts of interest and no financial disclosures.
- 1.Airaksinen O, Brox JI, Cedraschi C, Hildebrandt J, Klaber-Moffett J, Kovacs F, Mannion AF, Reis S, Staal JB, Ursin H, Zanoli G, COST B13 Working Group on Guidelines for Chronic Low Back Pain (2006) European guidelines for the management of chronic nonspecific low back pain. Eur Spine J 15:S192–S300CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 4.Dionne CE, Dunn KM, Croft PR, Nachemson AL, Buchbinder R, Walker BF, Wyatt M, Cassidy JD, Rossignol M, Leboeuf-Yde C, Hartvigsen J, Leino-Arjas P, Latza U, Reis S, Gil Del Real MT, Kovacs FM, Oberg B, Cedraschi C, Bouter LM, Koes BW, Picavet HS, van Tulder MW, Burton K, Foster NE, Macfarlane GJ, Thomas E, Underwood M, Waddell G, Shekelle P, Volinn E, Von Korff M (2008) A consensus approach toward the standardization of back pain definitions for use in prevalence studies. Spine 33:95–103CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 9.Cooper NA, Scavo KM, Strickland KJ, Tipayamongkol N, Nicholson JD, Bewyer DC, Sluka KA (2015) Prevalence of gluteus medius weakness in people with chronic low back pain compared to healthy controls. Eur Spine J (epub ahead of print)Google Scholar
- 10.Boden SD, Davis DO, Dina TS, Patronas NJ, Wiesel SW (1990) Abnormal magnetic-resonance scans of the lumbar spine in asymptomatic subjects. A prospective investigation. J Bone Jt Surg Am 72:403–408Google Scholar
- 11.Chiba Y, Isu T, Kim K, Iwamoto N, Morimoto D, Yamazaki K, Hokari M, Isobe M, Kusano M (2015) Intermittent low back pain attributable to superior cluneal nerve entrapment neuropathy. J Neurosurg Spine 13:1–5Google Scholar
- 20.Pedersen HE, Blunck CF, Gardner E (1956) The anatomy of lumbosacral posterior rami and meningeal branches of spinal nerves (sinu-vertebral nerves) with an experimental study of their functions. J Bone Jt Surg Am 38:377–391Google Scholar