Advertisement

European Spine Journal

, Volume 26, Issue 6, pp 1586–1594 | Cite as

Defining the bone morphometry, micro-architecture and volumetric density profile in osteopenic vs non-osteopenic adolescent idiopathic scoliosis

  • Zhi-Wei Wang
  • Wayne Yuk-Wai Lee
  • Tsz-Ping Lam
  • Benjamin Hon-Kei Yip
  • Fiona Wai-Ping Yu
  • Wing-Sze Yu
  • Feng Zhu
  • Bobby Kin-Wah Ng
  • Yong Qiu
  • Jack Chun-Yiu ChengEmail author
Original Article

Abstract

Purpose

Osteopenia has been widely reported in about 30 % of girls with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). However, the bone quality profile of the 70 % non-osteopenic AIS defined by areal bone mineral density (BMD) with conventional dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) has not been adequately studied. Our purpose was to verify whether abnormal volumetric BMD (vBMD) and bone structure (morphometry and micro-architecture) also existed in the non-osteopenic AIS when compared with matched controls using both DXA and high-resolution peripheral computed tomography (HR-pQCT).

Methods

This was a case–control cross-sectional study. 257 AIS girls with a mean age of 12.7 (SD = 0.8) years old and 187 age- and gender-matched normal controls with an average age of 12.9 (SD = 0.5) years old were included. Areal BMD (aBMD) and bone quality were measured with standard DXA and HR-pQCT, respectively. The parameters of HR-pQCT could be categorized as bone morphometry, vBMD and bone micro-architecture. The results were compared between the osteopenic AIS and osteopenic control, and between the non-osteopenic AIS and non-osteopenic control.

Results

In addition to the lower aBMD and vBMD, osteopenic AIS showed significantly greater cortical perimeter and trabecular area than the osteopenic control even after adjustments of age (P < 0.05). Non-osteopenic AIS also showed significantly lower aBMD together with lower cortical area, thickness and vBMD than the non-osteopenic control (P < 0.05). After adjustments of age, cortical area and vBMD, and trabecular number and separation continued to show statistical significance (P < 0.05). Both the osteopenic and non-osteopenic AIS subgroups revealed significant abnormal bone quality parameters from that in the control group after adjustments of age and aBMD with multi-linear regression analysis (P < 0.05).

Conclusions

The present study specifically defined the abnormal profile of bone quality in the osteopenic and non-osteopenic AIS for the first time. Both the osteopenic and non-osteopenic AIS were likely to have relatively lower bone mineral status and abnormal bone morphometry, micro-architecture and volumetric density profile compared with their normal matched controls. The observed abnormalities were suggestive of decreased endocortical bone apposition or active endocortical resorption that could affect the mechanical bone strength in AIS. The underlying pathomechanism might be attributed to abnormal bone modeling/remodeling that could be associated with the etiopathogenesis of AIS.

Keywords

Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis Bone mineral density Bone structure Osteopenia Bone quality 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This study is supported by Research Grants Council of the Hong Kong S.A.R., China (Project no: 463113 and 468809).

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

None.

References

  1. 1.
    Weinstein SL, Dolan LA, Cheng JC, Danielsson A, Morcuende JA (2008) Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Lancet 371:1527–1537. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)60658-3 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Yim AP, Yeung HY, Hung VW, Lee KM, Lam TP, Ng BK, Qiu Y, Cheng JC (2012) Abnormal skeletal growth patterns in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis—a longitudinal study until skeletal maturity. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 37:E1148–E1154. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31825c036d CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Yu WS, Chan KY, Yu FW, Ng BK, Lee KM, Qin L, Lam TP, Cheng JC (2014) Bone structural and mechanical indices in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis evaluated by high-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography (HR-pQCT). Bone 61:109–115. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2013.12.033 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Will RE, Stokes IA, Qiu X, Walker MR, Sanders JO (2009) Cobb angle progression in adolescent scoliosis begins at the intervertebral disc. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 34:2782–2786. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181c11853 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cheng JC, Guo X, Sher AH (1999) Persistent osteopenia in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. A longitudinal follow up study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 24:1218–1222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lee WT, Cheung CS, Tse YK, Guo X, Qin L, Lam TP, Ng BK, Cheng JC (2005) Association of osteopenia with curve severity in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a study of 919 girls. Osteoporos Int 16:1924–1932. doi: 10.1007/s00198-005-1964-7 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hung VW, Qin L, Cheung CS, Lam TP, Ng BK, Tse YK, Guo X, Lee KM, Cheng JC (2005) Osteopenia: a new prognostic factor of curve progression in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 87:2709–2716. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.D.02782 PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Seeman E, Delmas PD (2006) Bone quality—the material and structural basis of bone strength and fragility. N Engl J Med 354:2250–2261. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra053077 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Yeung HY, Qin L, Hung VW, Lee KM, Guo X, Ng BW, Cheng JC (2006) Lower degree of mineralization found in cortical bone of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). Stud Health Technol Inform 123:599–604PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Yung PS, Lai YM, Tung PY, Tsui HT, Wong CK, Hung VW, Qin L (2005) Effects of weight bearing and non-weight bearing exercises on bone properties using calcaneal quantitative ultrasound. Br J Sports Med 39:547–551. doi: 10.1136/bjsm.2004.014621 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Cheuk KY, Zhu TY, Yu FW, Hung VW, Lee KM, Qin L, Cheng JC, Lam TP (2015) Abnormal bone mechanical and structural properties in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a study with finite element analysis and structural model index. Calcif Tissue Int. doi: 10.1007/s00223-015-0025-2 PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Yu WS, Chan KY, Yu FW, Yeung HY, Ng BK, Lee KM, Lam TP, Cheng JC (2013) Abnormal bone quality versus low bone mineral density in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a case-control study with in vivo high-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography. Spine J 13:1493–1499. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2013.05.018 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kono K, Asazuma T, Suzuki N, Ono T (2000) Body height correction in scoliosis patients for pulmonary function test. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong) 8:19–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Laib A, Hauselmann HJ, Ruegsegger P (1998) In vivo high resolution 3D-QCT of the human forearm. Technol Health Care 6:329–337PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Goldberg CJ, Dowling FE, Fogarty EE (1993) Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis—early menarche, normal growth. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 18:529–535CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Seeman E (2009) Bone modeling and remodeling. Crit Rev Eukaryot Gene Expr 19:219–233. doi: 10.1615/CritRevEukarGeneExpr.v19.i3.40 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Parfitt AM (1994) The two faces of growth: benefits and risks to bone integrity. Osteoporos Int 4:382–398. doi: 10.1007/BF01622201 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Parfitt AM, Travers R, Rauch F, Glorieux FH (2000) Structural and cellular changes during bone growth in healthy children. Bone 27:487–494. doi: 10.1016/S8756-3282(00)00353-7 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Seeman E (2008) Structural basis of growth-related gain and age-related loss of bone strength. Rheumatology 47(Suppl 4):iv2–iv8. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/ken177 PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Bass SL, Saxon L, Daly RM, Turner CH, Robling AG, Seeman E, Stuckey S (2002) The effect of mechanical loading on the size and shape of bone in pre-, peri-, and postpubertal girls: a study in tennis players. J Bone Miner Res 17:2274–2280. doi: 10.1359/jbmr.2002.17.12.2274 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kim BT, Mosekilde L, Duan Y, Zhang XZ, Tornvig L, Thomsen JS, Seeman E (2003) The structural and hormonal basis of sex differences in peak appendicular bone strength in rats. J Bone Miner Res 18:150–155. doi: 10.1359/jbmr.2003.18.1.150 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Yeh JK, Chen MM, Aloia JF (1996) Ovariectomy-induced high turnover in cortical bone is dependent on pituitary hormone in rats. Bone 18:443–450. doi: 10.1016/8756-3282(96)00045-2 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Seeman E (2003) Periosteal bone formation—a neglected determinant of bone strength. N Engl J Med 349:320–323. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp038101 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Cassidy JT (1999) Osteopenia and osteoporosis in children. Clin Exp Rheumatol 17:245–250PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Machida M, Dubousset J, Yamada T, Kimura J (2009) Serum melatonin levels in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis prediction and prevention for curve progression—a prospective study. J Pineal Res 46:344–348. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-079X.2009.00669.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Moreau A, Wang DS, Forget S, Azeddine B, Angeloni D, Fraschini F, Labelle H, Poitras B, Rivard CH, Grimard G (2004) Melatonin signaling dysfunction in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 29:1772–1781CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Suh KT, Lee SS, Hwang SH, Kim SJ, Lee JS (2007) Elevated soluble receptor activator of nuclear factor-kappaB ligand and reduced bone mineral density in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Eur Spine J 16:1563–1569. doi: 10.1007/s00586-007-0390-2 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Cheng JC, Qin L, Cheung CS, Sher AH, Lee KM, Ng SW, Guo X (2000) Generalized low areal and volumetric bone mineral density in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. J Bone Miner Res 15:1587–1595. doi: 10.1359/jbmr.2000.15.8.1587 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Lee WT, Cheung CS, Tse YK, Guo X, Qin L, Ho SC, Lau J, Cheng JC (2005) Generalized low bone mass of girls with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis is related to inadequate calcium intake and weight bearing physical activity in peripubertal period. Osteoporos Int 16:1024–1035. doi: 10.1007/s00198-004-1792-1 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Society C (2000) Chinese Dietary Reference Intakes. Chinese Light Industry Press, BeijingGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Seeman E (2008) Bone quality: the material and structural basis of bone strength. J Bone Miner Metab 26:1–8. doi: 10.1007/s00774-007-0793-5 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Zhi-Wei Wang
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
  • Wayne Yuk-Wai Lee
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
  • Tsz-Ping Lam
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
  • Benjamin Hon-Kei Yip
    • 1
  • Fiona Wai-Ping Yu
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
  • Wing-Sze Yu
    • 1
  • Feng Zhu
    • 2
    • 5
  • Bobby Kin-Wah Ng
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
  • Yong Qiu
    • 2
    • 5
  • Jack Chun-Yiu Cheng
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of Orthopaedics and TraumatologyThe Chinese University of Hong KongHong Kong SARChina
  2. 2.Joint Scoliosis Research Center of the Chinese University of Hong Kong and Nanjing University, The Chinese University of Hong KongHong Kong SARChina
  3. 3.SH Ho Scoliosis Research Laboratory, Faculty of MedicineThe Chinese University of Hong KongHong Kong SARChina
  4. 4.Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Second Affiliated Hospital, School of MedicineZhejiang UniversityHangzhouChina
  5. 5.Spine Surgery, Nanjing Drum Tower HospitalNanjing UniversityNanjingChina

Personalised recommendations