Skip to main content
Log in

Does surgery for Scheuermann kyphosis influence sagittal spinopelvic parameters?

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Spine Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To analyze changes in sagittal spinopelvic parameters (SSPs) after surgical treatment of Scheuermann’s Kyphosis (SK).

Methods

We analyzed 20 patients affected by SK and subjected to posterior correction of the kyphosis by facetectomy, Ponte osteotomy, fusion and multilevel instrumentation with pedicle screw system. Four spinal and three pelvic parameters were measured: sagittal vertical axis (SVA), thoracic kyphosis (TK), thoracolumbar kyphosis, lumbar lordosis (LL), pelvic incidence (PI), sacral slope (SS) and pelvic tilt (PT). Analysis of changes in postprocedural SSPs compared to preoperative values was performed.

Results

TK passed from 78.6° preoperatively to 45.8° (p = 0.003). LL passed from 74.5° preoperatively to 53.5° (p = 0.01). No significant changes occurred in SVA, SS, PT and PI compared to preoperative values.

Conclusion

We confirm the positive effect of surgery by Ponte osteotomy and posterior spinal fusion on TK and LL in patients with SK. In our experience, pelvic parameters did not change after surgery.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Lowe TG (1990) Scheuermann disease. J Bone Jt Surg Am 72:940–945

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Hosman AJ, Langeloo DD, de Kleuver M et al (2002) Analysis of the sagittal plane after surgical management for Scheuermann’s disease: a view on overcorrection and the use of an anterior release. Spine 27:167–175

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Scheuermann H (1920) Kyphosis dorsalis juvenilis. 82:385

    Google Scholar 

  4. Damborg F, Engell V, Andersen M et al (2006) Prevalence, concordance, and heritability of Scheuermann kyphosis based on a study of twins. J Bone Jt Surg 88:2133–2136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. McKenzie L, Sillence D (1992) Familial Scheuermann disease: a genetic and linkage study. J Med Genet 29:41–45

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Lamartina C (2010) Posterior surgery in Scheuermann’s kyphosis. Eur Spine J Off Publ Eur Spine Soc Eur Spinal Deform Soc Eur Sect Cerv Spine Res Soc 19:515–516

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Faldini C, Di Martino A, Perna F et al (2014) Changes in spino-pelvic alignment after surgical treatment of high-grade isthmic spondylolisthesis by a posterior approach: a report of 41 cases. Eur Spine J 23:714–719

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Mohanty SP, Bhat SN, Ishwara-Keerthi C (2011) The effect of posterior instrumentation of the spine on canal dimensions and neurological recovery in thoracolumbar and lumbar burst fractures. Musculoskelet Surg 95:101–106. doi:10.1007/s12306-011-0111-1

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Rawall S, Mohan K, Nene A (2013) Posterior approach in thoracolumbar tuberculosis: a clinical and radiological review of 67 operated cases. Musculoskelet Surg 97:67–75. doi:10.1007/s12306-012-0235-y

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Erfani MA, Pourabbas B, Nouraie H et al (2014) Results of fusion and instrumentation of thoracic and lumbar vertebral fractures in children: a prospective ten-year study. Musculoskelet Surg 98:107–114. doi:10.1007/s12306-014-0313-4

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Lee J-H, Na K-H, Kim J-H et al (2015) Is pelvic incidence a constant, as everyone knows? Changes of pelvic incidence in surgically corrected adult sagittal deformity. Eur Spine J. doi:10.1007/s00586-015-4199-0

  12. Roussouly P, Pinheiro-Franco JL (2011) Biomechanical analysis of the spino-pelvic organization and adaptation in pathology. Eur Spine J 20:609–618. doi:10.1007/s00586-011-1928-x

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Weng W-J, Wang W-J, Wu M-D et al (2015) Characteristics of sagittal spine-pelvis-leg alignment in patients with severe hip osteoarthritis. Eur Spine J Off Publ Eur Spine Soc Eur Spinal Deform Soc Eur Sect Cerv Spine Res Soc 24:1228–1236. doi:10.1007/s00586-014-3700-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Lamartina C, Berjano P (2014) Classification of sagittal imbalance based on spinal alignment and compensatory mechanisms. Eur Spine J Off Publ Eur Spine Soc Eur Spinal Deform Soc Eur Sect Cerv Spine Res Soc 23:1177–1189. doi:10.1007/s00586-014-3227-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Sørensen KH (1964) Scheuermann’s juvenile kyphosis: clinical appearances, radiography, aetiology, and prognosis. Munksgaard

  16. Cil A, Yazici M, Uzumcugil A et al (2005) The evolution of sagittal segmental alignment of the spine during childhood. Spine 30:93–100

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Papagelopoulos PJ, Mavrogenis AF, Savvidou OD et al (2008) Current concepts in Scheuermann’s kyphosis. Orthopedics 31:52–58. doi:10.3928/01477447-20080101-33

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Ashraf A, Noelle Larson A, Polly DW et al (2014) Change in Sagittal plane alignment following surgery for Scheuermann’s Kyphosis. Spine Deform 2:404–409. doi:10.1016/j.jspd.2014.04.013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Behrbalk E, Uri O, Parks RM et al (2014) Posterior-only correction of Scheuermann kyphosis using pedicle screws: economical optimization through screw density reduction. Eur Spine J Off Publ Eur Spine Soc Eur Spinal Deform Soc Eur Sect Cerv Spine Res Soc 23:2203–2210. doi:10.1007/s00586-014-3472-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Macagno AE, O’Brien MF (2006) Thoracic and thoracolumbar kyphosis in adults. Spine 31:S161–S170. doi:10.1097/01.brs.0000236909.26123.f8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Geck MJ, Macagno A, Ponte A, Shufflebarger HL (2007) The Ponte procedure: posterior only treatment of Scheuermann’s kyphosis using segmental posterior shortening and pedicle screw instrumentation. J Spinal Disord Tech 20:586–593. doi:10.1097/BSD.0b013e31803d3b16

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Ponte A (2003) Posterior column shortening for Scheuermann’s kyphosis: an innovative one-stage technique. Surg Tech Spine N Y NY Thieme Med 107–113

  23. Lonner BS, Newton P, Betz R et al (2007) Operative management of Scheuermann’s kyphosis in 78 patients: radiographic outcomes, complications, and technique. Spine 32:2644–2652. doi:10.1097/BRS.0b013e31815a5238

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Jiang L, Qiu Y, Xu L et al (2014) Sagittal spinopelvic alignment in adolescents associated with Scheuermann’s kyphosis: a comparison with normal population. Eur Spine J Off Publ Eur Spine Soc Eur Spinal Deform Soc Eur Sect Cerv Spine Res Soc 23:1420–1426. doi:10.1007/s00586-014-3266-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Tyrakowski M, Mardjetko S, Siemionow K (2014) Radiographic spinopelvic parameters in skeletally mature patients with Scheuermann disease. Spine 39:E1080–E1085. doi:10.1097/BRS.0000000000000460

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Cesare Faldini.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

None.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Faldini, C., Traina, F., Perna, F. et al. Does surgery for Scheuermann kyphosis influence sagittal spinopelvic parameters?. Eur Spine J 24 (Suppl 7), 893–897 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-015-4253-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-015-4253-y

Keywords

Navigation