Severe back pain in elite athletes: a cross-sectional study on 929 top athletes of Germany
- 504 Downloads
The cross-sectional study evaluates the incidence, localization, treatment, and influencing factors of back pain (BP) in Germany’s elite athletes.
An online questionnaire was sent out to 3564 top athletes. We used the VAS to identify the intensity of BP and SPSS for statistical analyses.
929 athletes responded. 514 (55.3 %) had BP within the last 12 months, mainly located in the lumbar spine (n = 293, 56.1 %). The average pain intensity was 5.75/10. Back-affecting exercise and additional burdens (e.g. at their place of work) did not increase the intensity of BP. When dividing the athletes into two groups according to the BP intensity, BP did not correlate with gender, age or BMI.
At least every tenth athlete suffers temporarily from low BP at a level at which spine surgery could be the only option to relieve the pain. BP occurs independently of back-affecting training and additional stress. Further evaluation is needed to identify factors for avoiding severe BP in top athletes.
KeywordsBack pain Elite athletes Sport Spine
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
- 5.Balagué F, Nordin M, Skovron ML, Dutoit G, Yee A, Waldburger M (1994) Non-specific low-back pain among schoolchildren: a field survey with analysis of some associated factors. J Spinal Disord (PMID:7819636) Google Scholar
- 9.Jackson D, Wiltse L, Cirincione R (1976) Spondylolysis in the female gymnast. Clin, OrthopGoogle Scholar
- 10.Korovessis P, Koureas G, Papazisis Z (2004) Correlation between backpack weight and way of carrying, sagittal and frontal spinal curvatures, athletic activity, and dorsal and low back pain in schoolchildren and adolescents. J Spinal Disord Tech 17(1):33–40 (PMID:14734974) CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 14.Jeffries LJ, Milanese SF, Grimmer-Somers KA (2007) Epidemiology of adolescent spinal pain: a systematic overview of the research literature. Spine 32(23):2630–7 (PMID:17978666) Google Scholar
- 15.Mattila VM, Sahi T, Jormanainen V, Pihlajamäli H (2008) Low back pain and its risk indicators: a survey of 7.040 Finnish mal conscripts. Eur Spine J 17(1):64–69 (PMID:17874146) Google Scholar
- 17.Davis RJ, Kim KD, Hisey MS, Hoffman GA, Bae HW, Gaede SE, Rashbaum RF, Nunley PD, Peterson DL, Stokes JK (2013) Cervical total disc replacement with the Mobi-C cervical artificial disc compared with anterior discectomy and fusion for treatment of 2-level symptomatic degenerative disc disease: a prospective, randomized, controlled multicenter clinical trial: clinical article. J Neurosurg Spine. doi: 10.3171/2013.6.SPINE12527 Google Scholar
- 18.Leboeuf-Yde C, Kyvik KO (1998) At what age does low back pain become a common problem? A study of 29,424 individuals aged 12–41 years. Spine 23(2):228–234 (PMID:9474731) Google Scholar
- 20.Wedderkopp N, Leboeuf-Yde C, Andersen LB, Froberg K, Hansen HS (2001) Back pain reporting pattern in a Danish population-based sample of children and adolescents. Spine 26(17):1879–83 (PMID:11568698) Google Scholar
- 21.Fanucchi GL, Stewart A, Jordaan R, Becker P (2009) Exercise reduces the intensity and prevalence of low back pain in 12–13 year old children: a randomised trial. Aust J Physiother 55(2):97–104 (PMID:19463080) Google Scholar
- 23.Campello M, Nordin M, Weiser S (1996) Physical exercise and low back pain. Scand J Med Sci Sports 6(2):63–72 (PMID:8809923) Google Scholar
- 24.Brokelman RB, Haverkamp D, van Loon C, Hol A, van Kampen A, Veth R (2012) The validation of the visual analogue scale for patient satisfaction after total hip arthroplasty. Eur Orthop Traumatol 3(2):101–105 (PMID:22798966)Google Scholar
- 25.Bijur PE, Silver W, Gallagher EJ (2001) Reliability of the Visual Analog Scale for Measurement of Acute Pain. Acad Emerg Med 8(12):1153–57 (PMID:11733293)Google Scholar