Advertisement

European Spine Journal

, Volume 25, Issue 1, pp 235–246 | Cite as

Influence of gender on patient-oriented outcomes in spine surgery

  • L. Pochon
  • F. S. Kleinstück
  • F. Porchet
  • Anne F. Mannion
Original Article

Abstract

Purpose

Few studies have examined gender differences in patient-oriented health-related quality of life before and after spine surgery. This study examined the influence of gender on baseline status and 1-year postoperative outcomes in a large series of patients undergoing surgery for different degenerative spinal disorders.

Methods

The study included 1518 patients [812 men and 706 women; mean (SD) age 61.4 ± 16.2 years], with three different pathologies (disc herniation, degenerative spondylolisthesis, or spinal stenosis), treated with specified surgical approaches. Preoperatively and 12 months postoperatively, patients completed the multidimensional Core Outcome Measures Index (COMI). Medical history, surgical details and perioperative complications were documented with the Eurospine “Spine Tango” Surgery 2006 form.

Results

Preoperatively and for all three pathologies, women had significantly (p < 0.05) worse COMI-scores than men, especially for the sub-domains “leg/buttock pain”, “dominant pain intensity”, and “general quality of life”; the change in the COMI sum score 12 months postoperatively showed no significant gender differences for any pathology (p > 0.05). 71.3 % males and 72.9 % females achieved the minimal clinically important change score (MCIC; 2.2 point reduction) for the COMI. Controlling for potential cofounders (preoperative COMI, ASA, complications, pathology), gender showed no significant association with the failure to achieve MCIC.

Conclusions

This results show that women do not differ significantly from men regarding their postoperative outcome, even though they present with a worse preoperative status. The management of a patient’s condition should not differ depending on their gender, since both men and women are able to improve to a similar extent.

Keywords

COMI Gender MCIC Outcome Spine surgery 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by the Schulthess Klinik Research Fund. We are grateful to Malgorzata Roos and Farouhar Mouttet for their assistance in conducting the statistical analyses. We would like to thank Dave O’Riordan, Gordana Balaban, Nora Aziz-Toth, Julian Amacker, Kirsten Clift, Selina Nauer, and Anne Fröhlich for their valuable assistance in collecting the questionnaire data and managing the Spine Tango Surgery data forms.

Conflict of interest

None.

References

  1. 1.
    Airaksinen O, Brox JI, Cedraschi C, Hildebrandt J, Klaber-Moffett J, Kovacs F, Mannion AF, Reis S, Staal JB, Ursin H, Zanoli G, COST B13 Working Group on Guidelines for Chronic Low Back Pain (2006) Chapter 4. European guidelines for the management of chronic nonspecific low back pain. Eur Spine J 15(Suppl 2):S192–S300. doi: 10.1007/s00586-006-1072-1 PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Deyo RA, Battie M, Beurskens AJ, Bombardier C, Croft P, Koes B, Malmivaara A, Roland M, Von Korff M, Waddell G (1998) Outcome measures for low back pain research. A proposal for standardized use. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 23:2003–2013CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Mannion AF, Elfering A, Staerkle R, Junge A, Grob D, Dvorak J, Jacobshagen N, Semmer NK, Boos N (2007) Predictors of multidimensional outcome after spinal surgery. Eur Spine J 16:777–786. doi: 10.1007/s00586-006-0255-0 PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Mannion AF, Elfering A (2006) Predictors of surgical outcome and their assessment. Eur Spine J 15(Suppl 1):S93–S108. doi: 10.1007/s00586-005-1045-9 PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Peolsson A, Hedlund R, Vavruch L, Oberg B (2003) Predictive factors for the outcome of anterior cervical decompression and fusion. Eur Spine J 12:274–280. doi: 10.1007/s00586-003-0530-2 PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Katz JN, Stucki G, Lipson SJ, Fossel AH, Grobler LJ, Weinstein JN (1999) Predictors of surgical outcome in degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 24:2229–2233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Block AR, Ohnmeiss DD, Guyer RD, Rashbaum RF, Hochschuler SH (2001) The use of presurgical psychological screening to predict the outcome of spine surgery. Spine J 1:274–282PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kohlboeck G, Greimel KV, Piotrowski WP, Leibetseder M, Krombholz-Reindl M, Neuhofer R, Schmid A, Klinger R (2004) Prognosis of multifactorial outcome in lumbar discectomy: a prospective longitudinal study investigating patients with disc prolapse. Clin J Pain 20:455–461PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Fillingim RB, King CD, Ribeiro-Dasilva MC, Rahim-Williams B, Riley JL (2009) Sex, gender, and pain: a review of recent clinical and experimental findings. J Pain 10:447–485. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2008.12.001 PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kroenke K, Spitzer RL (1998) Gender differences in the reporting of physical and somatoform symptoms. Psychosom Med 60:150–155PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Unruh AM (1996) Gender variations in clinical pain experience. Pain 65:123–167PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Berkley KJ (1997) Sex differences in pain. Behav Brain Sci 20:371–380 (discussion 435-513) PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Mannion AF, Junge A, Taimela S, Müntener M, Lorenzo K, Dvorak J (2001) Active therapy for chronic low back pain: part 3. Factors influencing self-rated disability and its change following therapy. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 26:920–929CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Mannion AF, Wieser S, Elfering A (2013) Association Between Beliefs and Care-Seeking Behavior for Low Back Pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31828473b5 Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Katz JN, Wright EA, Guadagnoli E, Liang MH, Karlson EW, Cleary PD (1994) Differences between men and women undergoing major orthopedic surgery for degenerative arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 37:687–694PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Loupasis GA, Stamos K, Katonis PG, Sapkas G, Korres DS, Hartofilakidis G (1999) Seven- to 20-year outcome of lumbar discectomy. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 24:2313–2317CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Strömqvist F, Ahmad M, Hildingsson C, Jönsson B, Strömqvist B (2008) Gender differences in lumbar disc herniation surgery. Acta Orthop 79:643–649. doi: 10.1080/17453670810016669 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Vucetic N, Astrand P, Güntner P, Svensson O (1999) Diagnosis and prognosis in lumbar disc herniation. Clin Orthop Relat Res 361:116–122PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Peul WC, Brand R, Thomeer RT, Koes BW (2008) Influence of gender and other prognostic factors on outcome of sciatica. Pain 138:180–191. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2007.12.014 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Anjarwalla NK, Brown LC, McGregor AH (2007) The outcome of spinal decompression surgery 5 years on. Eur Spine J 16:1842–1847. doi: 10.1007/s00586-007-0393-z PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Lehto MU, Honkanen P (1995) Factors influencing the outcome of operative treatment for lumbar spinal stenosis. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 137:25–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Häkkinen A, Kautiainen H, Järvenpää S, Arkela-Kautiainen M, Ylinen J (2007) Changes in the total Oswestry Index and its ten items in females and males pre- and post-surgery for lumbar disc herniation: a 1-year follow-up. Eur Spine J 16:347–352. doi: 10.1007/s00586-006-0187-8 PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Waddell G, Kummel EG, Lotto WN, Graham JD, Hall H, McCulloch JA (1979) Failed lumbar disc surgery and repeat surgery following industrial injuries. J Bone Joint Surg Am 61:201–207PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Mannion AF, Porchet F, Kleinstück FS, Lattig F, Jeszenszky D, Bartanusz V, Dvorak J, Grob D (2009) The quality of spine surgery from the patient’s perspective: part 2. Minimal clinically important difference for improvement and deterioration as measured with the Core Outcome Measures Index. Eur Spine J 18(Suppl 3):374–379. doi: 10.1007/s00586-009-0931-y PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Karlson EW, Daltroy LH, Liang MH, Eaton HE, Katz JN (1997) Gender differences in patient preferences may underlie differential utilization of elective surgery. Am J Med 102:524–530PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    McCullen GM, Bernini PM, Bernstein SH, Tosteson TD (1994) Clinical and roentgenographic results of decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis. J Spinal Disord 7:380–387PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Shabat S, Folman Y, Arinzon Z, Adunsky A, Catz A, Gepstein R (2005) Gender differences as an influence on patients’ satisfaction rates in spinal surgery of elderly patients. Eur Spine J 14:1027–1032. doi: 10.1007/s00586-004-0808-z PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Gepstein R, Arinzon Z, Adunsky A, Folman Y (2006) Decompression surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis in the elderly: preoperative expectations and postoperative satisfaction. Spinal Cord 44:427–431. doi: 10.1038/sj.sc.3101857 PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Mannion AF, Junge A, Elfering A, Dvorak J, Porchet F, Grob D (2009) Great expectations: really the novel predictor of outcome after spinal surgery? Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 34:1590–1599. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31819fcd52 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Merchant RA, Lui KL, Ismail NH, Wong HP, Sitoh YY (2005) The relationship between postoperative complications and outcomes after hip fracture surgery. Ann Acad Med Singapore 34:163–168PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Myles PS, Hunt JO, Moloney JT (1997) Postoperative ‘minor’ complications. Comparison between men and women. Anaesthesia 52:300–306PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Velanovich V (1993) The effects of age, gender, race and concomitant disease on postoperative complications. J R Coll Surg Edinb 38:225–230PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Mannion AF, Fekete TF, Porchet F, Haschtmann D, Jeszenszky D, Kleinstück FS (2014) The influence of comorbidity on the risks and benefits of spine surgery for degenerative lumbar disorders. Eur Spine J 23(Suppl 1):S66–S71. doi: 10.1007/s00586-014-3189-y PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Levine FM, De Simone LL (1991) The effects of experimenter gender on pain report in male and female subjects. Pain 44:69–72PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Shehab A, Al-Dabbagh B, AlHabib KF, Alsheikh-Ali AA, Almahmeed W, Sulaiman K, Al-Motarreb A, Nagelkerke N, Al Suwaidi J, Hersi A, Al Faleh H, Asaad N, Al Saif S, Amin H (2013) Gender disparities in the presentation, management and outcomes of acute coronary syndrome patients: data from the 2nd Gulf Registry of Acute Coronary Events (Gulf RACE-2). PLoS One 8:e55508. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0055508 PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Gijsbers van Wijk CM, van Vliet KP, Kolk AM (1996) Gender perspectives and quality of care: towards appropriate and adequate health care for women. Soc Sci Med 43:707–720PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Doyal L (2000) Gender equity in health: debates and dilemmas. Soc Sci Med 51:931–939PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • L. Pochon
    • 1
  • F. S. Kleinstück
    • 2
  • F. Porchet
    • 2
  • Anne F. Mannion
    • 1
  1. 1.Spine Center Division, Department of Research and DevelopmentSchulthess KlinikZurichSwitzerland
  2. 2.Spine CenterSchulthess KlinikZürichSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations