European Spine Journal

, Volume 24, Supplement 3, pp 353–360 | Cite as

Technical nuances of the minimally invasive extreme lateral approach to treat thoracolumbar burst fractures

  • Gurpreet S. Gandhoke
  • Zachary J. Tempel
  • Christopher M. Bonfield
  • Ricky Madhok
  • David O. Okonkwo
  • Adam S. Kanter
Ideas and Technical Innovations

Abstract

Purpose

Contemporary minimally invasive techniques have evolved to enable direct access to the anterior spinal column via the extreme lateral approach. We have employed this access approach to treat selected burst fractures. We report our technique. Thoracolumbar burst fractures that require surgical intervention have traditionally been managed with anterior, posterior, or combined approaches.

Methods

We have applied the minimally invasive extreme lateral approach to perform vertebral corpectomy, cage placement, and lateral instrumentation to treat burst fractures. Indications for surgery were incomplete spinal cord injury with persistent neural element compression due to ventral fracture fragments in the canal. We present the technical nuances of this surgical approach for the treatment of thoracolumbar burst fractures with two case illustrations.

Results

There were no peri- or intra-operative complications. Both patients in our series remained neurologically intact at their last follow-up (11 and 29 months, respectively), and maintained their correction of kyphosis.

Conclusion

The minimally invasive extreme lateral approach is an effective treatment option for the management of thoracolumbar burst fractures.

Keywords

Thoracolumbar burst fracture Spine trauma Extreme lateral approach Minimally invasive spine surgery 

Notes

Conflict of interest

None of the authors have any conflict of interest to disclose with regard to the material presented in this manuscript.

References

  1. 1.
    Aebi M, Etter C, Kehl T, Thalgott J (1987) Stabilization of the lower thoracic and lumbar spine with the internal spinal skeletal fixation system. Indications, techniques, and first results of treatment. Spine 12:544–551CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Clohisy JC, Akbarnia BA, Bucholz RD, Burkus JK, Backer RJ (1992) Neurologic recovery associated with anterior decompression of spine fractures at the thoracolumbar junction (T12–L1). Spine 17:S325–S330CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Dai LY, Jiang SD, Wang XY, Jiang LS (2007) A review of the management of thoracolumbar burst fractures. Surg Neurol 67:221–231 (discussion 31)CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Denis F (1983) The three column spine and its significance in the classification of acute thoracolumbar spinal injuries. Spine 8:817–831CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    McDonough PW, Davis R, Tribus C, Zdeblick TA (2004) The management of acute thoracolumbar burst fractures with anterior corpectomy and Z-plate fixation. Spine 29:1901–1908 (discussion 9)CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Faciszewski T, Winter RB, Lonstein JE, Denis F, Johnson L (1995) The surgical and medical perioperative complications of anterior spinal fusion surgery in the thoracic and lumbar spine in adults. A review of 1223 procedures. Spine 20:1592–1599CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kim DH, Jaikumar S, Kam AC (2002) Minimally invasive spine instrumentation. Neurosurgery 51:S15–S25PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bergey DL, Villavicencio AT, Goldstein T, Regan JJ (2004) Endoscopic lateral transpsoas approach to the lumbar spine. Spine 29:1681–1688CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ozgur BM, Aryan HE, Pimenta L, Taylor WR (2006) Extreme lateral interbody fusion (XLIF): a novel surgical technique for anterior lumbar interbody fusion. Spine J 6:435–443CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Vaccaro AR, Lehman RA Jr, Hurlbert RJ et al (2005) A new classification of thoracolumbar injuries: the importance of injury morphology, the integrity of the posterior ligamentous complex, and neurologic status. Spine 30:2325–2333CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    McBride GG (1993) Cotrel-Dubousset rods in surgical stabilization of spinal fractures. Spine 18:466–473CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kramer DL, Rodgers WB, Mansfield FL (1995) Transpedicular instrumentation and short-segment fusion of thoracolumbar fractures: a prospective study using a single instrumentation system. J Orthop Trauma 9:499–506CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Markel DC, Graziano GP (1995) A comparison study of treatment of thoracolumbar fractures using the ACE Posterior Segmental Fixator and Cotrel-Dubousset instrumentation. Orthopedics 18:679–686PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Parker JW, Lane JR, Karaikovic EE, Gaines RW (2000) Successful short-segment instrumentation and fusion for thoracolumbar spine fractures: a consecutive 41/2-year series. Spine 25:1157–1170CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Tezeren G, Kuru I (2005) Posterior fixation of thoracolumbar burst fracture: short-segment pedicle fixation versus long-segment instrumentation. J Spinal Disord Tech 18:485–488CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hodgson AR, Stock FE (1956) Anterior spinal fusion a preliminary communication on the radical treatment of Pott’s disease and Pott’s paraplegia. Br J Surg 44:266–275CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Bohlman HH, Freehafer A, Dejak J (1985) The results of treatment of acute injuries of the upper thoracic spine with paralysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 67(3):360–369PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Dunn HK (1984) Anterior stabilization of thoracolumbar injuries. Clin Orthop Relat Res (189):116–124Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Kostuik JP (1983) Anterior spinal cord decompression for lesions of the thoracic and lumbar spine, techniques, new methods of internal fixation results. Spine 8:512–531CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Gumbs AA, Bloom ND, Bitan FD, Hanan SH (2007) Open anterior approaches for lumbar spine procedures. Am J Surg 194:98–102CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Westfall SH, Akbarnia BA, Merenda JT et al (1987) Exposure of the anterior spine. Technique, complications, and results in 85 patients. Am J Surg 154:700–704CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Anand N, Regan JJ (2002) Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery for thoracic disc disease: classification and outcome study of 100 consecutive cases with a 2-year minimum follow-up period. Spine 27:871–879CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Cunningham BW, Kotani Y, McNulty PS et al (1998) Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery versus open thoracotomy for anterior thoracic spinal fusion. A comparative radiographic, biomechanical, and histologic analysis in a sheep model. Spine 23:1333–1340CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Escobar E, Transfeldt E, Garvey T, Ogilvie J, Graber J, Schultz L (2003) Video-assisted versus open anterior lumbar spine fusion surgery: a comparison of four techniques and complications in 135 patients. Spine 28:729–732PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Scheufler KM (2007) Technique and clinical results of minimally invasive reconstruction and stabilization of the thoracic and thoracolumbar spine with expandable cages and ventrolateral plate fixation. Neurosurgery 61:798–808 (discussion 9)CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    McAfee PC, Regan JR, Zdeblick T et al (1995) The incidence of complications in endoscopic anterior thoracolumbar spinal reconstructive surgery. A prospective multicenter study comprising the first 100 consecutive cases. Spine 20:1624–1632CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gurpreet S. Gandhoke
    • 1
  • Zachary J. Tempel
    • 1
  • Christopher M. Bonfield
    • 1
  • Ricky Madhok
    • 2
  • David O. Okonkwo
    • 1
  • Adam S. Kanter
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Neurological SurgeryUniversity of Pittsburgh Medical CenterPittsburghUSA
  2. 2.North Shore University HospitalNew YorkUSA

Personalised recommendations