The learning curve of lateral access lumbar interbody fusion in an Asian population: a prospective study
- 559 Downloads
Lateral access lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) is a minimally invasive technique that has an increasing popularity. It offers unique advantages and circumvents risk of certain serious complications encountered in other conventional spinal approaches. This study provides a statistical analysis defining the lateral access learning curve in the Asian population.
This prospective study included 32 consecutive patients who underwent LLIF from April 2012 to August 2014. The surgeries were performed by two senior spine surgeons and follow-up was conducted at 6 weeks, 3, 6, 9 months and 1 year post-operation.
The breakpoint in operating time occurred at the 22nd level operated, from a mean of 71 min in the early phase group to a mean of 42 min in the steady state group. LLIF at L4/5 level is technically more demanding but technically feasible as competency is achieved.
During the learning process, there was no compromise of perioperative or clinical outcomes. It should be feasibly incorporated into a spine surgeon’s repertoire of procedures for the lumbar spine.
KeywordsLateral access lumbar surgery Minimally invasive surgery Lumbar spine Learning curve
We would like to acknowledge Richard Tjahjono, medical illustrator, for his drawings used in this article.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- 11.Formica M, Berjano P, Cavagnaro L, Zanirato A, Piazzolla A, Formica C (2014) Extreme lateral approach to the spine in degenerative and post traumatic lumbar diseases: selection process, results and complications. Eur Spine J 23(Suppl 6):684–692. doi: 10.1007/s00586-014-3545-y CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 13.Aichmair A, Lykissas MG, Girardi FP, Sama AA, Lebl DR, Taher F, Cammisa FP, Hughes AP (2013) An institutional six-year trend analysis of the neurological outcome after lateral lumbar interbody fusion: a 6-year trend analysis of a single institution. Spine 38(23):E1483–E1490. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3182a3d1b4 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 14.Hyde J, Seits M (2011) Clinical experience, outcomes, and learning curve following XLIF for lumbar degenerative conditions. WScJ 2(1):21–26Google Scholar
- 19.Franke J, Greiner-Perth R, Boehm H, Mahlfeld K, Grasshoff H, Allam Y, Awiszus F (2009) Comparison of a minimally invasive procedure versus standard microscopic discotomy: a prospective randomised controlled clinical trial. Eur Spine J 18(7):992–1000. doi: 10.1007/s00586-009-0964-2 CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 24.Singer G (2005) Occupational radiation exposure to the surgeon. J Am Acad Orthop Sur 13(1):69–76Google Scholar