European Spine Journal

, Volume 24, Supplement 3, pp 361–368 | Cite as

The learning curve of lateral access lumbar interbody fusion in an Asian population: a prospective study

  • Chong Leslie Lich Ng
  • Boon Chuan Pang
  • Paul Julius A. Medina
  • Kimberly-Anne Tan
  • Selvaraj Dahshaini
  • Li-Zhen Liu
Original Article
First Online:
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:

Abstract

Purpose

Lateral access lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) is a minimally invasive technique that has an increasing popularity. It offers unique advantages and circumvents risk of certain serious complications encountered in other conventional spinal approaches. This study provides a statistical analysis defining the lateral access learning curve in the Asian population.

Methods

This prospective study included 32 consecutive patients who underwent LLIF from April 2012 to August 2014. The surgeries were performed by two senior spine surgeons and follow-up was conducted at 6 weeks, 3, 6, 9 months and 1 year post-operation.

Results

The breakpoint in operating time occurred at the 22nd level operated, from a mean of 71 min in the early phase group to a mean of 42 min in the steady state group. LLIF at L4/5 level is technically more demanding but technically feasible as competency is achieved.

Conclusions

During the learning process, there was no compromise of perioperative or clinical outcomes. It should be feasibly incorporated into a spine surgeon’s repertoire of procedures for the lumbar spine.

Keywords

Lateral access lumbar surgery Minimally invasive surgery Lumbar spine Learning curve 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Notes

Acknowledgments

We would like to acknowledge Richard Tjahjono, medical illustrator, for his drawings used in this article.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Sharma AK, Kepler CK, Girardi FP, Cammisa FP, Huang RC, Sama AA (2011) Lateral lumbar interbody fusion: clinical and radiographic outcomes at 1 year: a preliminary report. J Spinal Disord Tech 24(4):242–250. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0b013e3181ecf995 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Oliveira L, Marchi L, Coutinho E, Pimenta L (2010) A radiographic assessment of the ability of the extreme lateral interbody fusion procedure to indirectly decompress the neural elements. Spine 35(26 Suppl):S331–S337. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3182022db0 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Dakwar E, Cardona RF, Smith DA, Uribe JS (2010) Early outcomes and safety of the minimally invasive, lateral retroperitoneal transpsoas approach for adult degenerative scoliosis. Neurosurg Focus 28(3):E8. doi: 10.3171/2010.1.focus09282 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ozgur BM, Aryan HE, Pimenta L, Taylor WR (2006) Extreme lateral interbody fusion (XLIF): a novel surgical technique for anterior lumbar interbody fusion. Spine J 6(4):435–443. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2005.08.012 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Rodgers WB, Gerber EJ, Rodgers JA (2010) Lumbar fusion in octogenarians: the promise of minimally invasive surgery. Spine 35(26 Suppl):S355–S360. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3182023796 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Berjano P, Lamartina C (2011) Minimally invasive lateral transpsoas approach with advanced neurophysiologic monitoring for lumbar interbody fusion. Eur Spine J 20(9):1584–1586. doi: 10.1007/s00586-011-1997-x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Berjano P, Lamartina C (2013) Far lateral approaches (XLIF) in adult scoliosis. Eur Spine J 22(2):242–253. doi: 10.1007/s00586-012-2426-5 CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Pimenta L, Oliveira L, Schaffa T, Coutinho E, Marchi L (2011) Lumbar total disc replacement from an extreme lateral approach: clinical experience with a minimum of 2 years follow-up. J Neurosurg Spine 14(1):38–45. doi: 10.3171/2010.9.spine09865 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Berjano P, Balsano M, Buric J, Petruzzi M, Lamartina C (2012) Direct lateral access lumbar and thoracolumbar fusion: preliminary results. Eur Spine J 21(Suppl 1):S37–S42. doi: 10.1007/s00586-012-2217-z CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Arnold PM, Anderson KK, McGuire RA Jr (2012) The lateral transpsoas approach to the lumbar and thoracic spine: a review. Surg Neurol Int 3(Suppl 3):S198–S215. doi: 10.4103/2152-7806.98583 CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Formica M, Berjano P, Cavagnaro L, Zanirato A, Piazzolla A, Formica C (2014) Extreme lateral approach to the spine in degenerative and post traumatic lumbar diseases: selection process, results and complications. Eur Spine J 23(Suppl 6):684–692. doi: 10.1007/s00586-014-3545-y CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Khajavi K, Shen AY (2014) Two-year radiographic and clinical outcomes of a minimally invasive, lateral, transpsoas approach for anterior lumbar interbody fusion in the treatment of adult degenerative scoliosis. Eur Spine J 23(6):1215–1223. doi: 10.1007/s00586-014-3246-6 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Aichmair A, Lykissas MG, Girardi FP, Sama AA, Lebl DR, Taher F, Cammisa FP, Hughes AP (2013) An institutional six-year trend analysis of the neurological outcome after lateral lumbar interbody fusion: a 6-year trend analysis of a single institution. Spine 38(23):E1483–E1490. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3182a3d1b4 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hyde J, Seits M (2011) Clinical experience, outcomes, and learning curve following XLIF for lumbar degenerative conditions. WScJ 2(1):21–26Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Meredith DS, Kepler CK, Huang RC, Hegde VV (2013) Extreme lateral interbody fusion (XLIF) in the thoracic and thoracolumbar spine: technical report and early outcomes. Musculoskeletal J of HSS J 9(1):25–31. doi: 10.1007/s11420-012-9312-x Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Lee KH, Yeo W, Soeharno H, Yue WM (2014) Learning curve of a complex surgical technique: minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS TLIF). J Spinal Disord Tech. doi: 10.1097/bsd.0000000000000089 Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Muggeo VM (2003) Estimating regression models with unknown break-points. Stat Med 22(19):3055–3071. doi: 10.1002/sim.1545 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Obenchain TG (1991) Laparoscopic lumbar discectomy: case report. J Laparoendosc Surg 1(3):145–149CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Franke J, Greiner-Perth R, Boehm H, Mahlfeld K, Grasshoff H, Allam Y, Awiszus F (2009) Comparison of a minimally invasive procedure versus standard microscopic discotomy: a prospective randomised controlled clinical trial. Eur Spine J 18(7):992–1000. doi: 10.1007/s00586-009-0964-2 CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Park DK, Lee MJ, Lin EL, Singh K, An HS, Phillips FM (2010) The relationship of intrapsoas nerves during a transpsoas approach to the lumbar spine: anatomic study. J Spinal Disord Tech 23(4):223–228. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0b013e3181a9d540 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Benglis DM, Vanni S, Levi AD (2009) An anatomical study of the lumbosacral plexus as related to the minimally invasive transpsoas approach to the lumbar spine. J Neurosurg Spine 10(2):139–144. doi: 10.3171/2008.10.spi08479 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Uribe JS, Vale FL, Dakwar E (2010) Electromyographic monitoring and its anatomical implications in minimally invasive spine surgery. Spine 35(26 Suppl):S368–S374. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3182027976 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Uribe JS, Arredondo N, Dakwar E, Vale FL (2010) Defining the safe working zones using the minimally invasive lateral retroperitoneal transpsoas approach: an anatomical study. J Neurosurg Spine 13(2):260–266. doi: 10.3171/2010.3.spine09766 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Singer G (2005) Occupational radiation exposure to the surgeon. J Am Acad Orthop Sur 13(1):69–76Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Pumberger M, Hughes AP, Huang RR, Sama AA, Cammisa FP, Girardi FP (2012) Neurologic deficit following lateral lumbar interbody fusion. Eur Spine J 21(6):1192–1199. doi: 10.1007/s00586-011-2087-9 CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Chong Leslie Lich Ng
    • 1
  • Boon Chuan Pang
    • 2
  • Paul Julius A. Medina
    • 3
  • Kimberly-Anne Tan
    • 4
  • Selvaraj Dahshaini
    • 1
  • Li-Zhen Liu
    • 5
  1. 1.Spine Surgery, Deptartment of OrthopedicsTan Tock Seng HospitalSingaporeSingapore
  2. 2.National Neuroscience InstituteSingaporeSingapore
  3. 3.Department of OrthopedicsTan Tock Seng HospitalSingaporeSingapore
  4. 4.Faculty of Medicine, UNSW MedicineUniversity of New South Wales, UNSWSydneyAustralia
  5. 5.Tan Tock Seng HospitalSingaporeSingapore

Personalised recommendations