Associations among pain, disability and psychosocial factors and the predictive value of expectations on returning to work in patients who undergo lumbar disc surgery
- 494 Downloads
The aim of this study was to describe the associations among pain, disability and psychosocial factors preoperatively as well as 3 and 24 months later for patients who undergo first time discectomy and to analyse the predictive value of psychosocial factors on the outcome 24 months after surgery.
Fifty-nine patients, 41 % women, with a mean age of 40 years and without comorbidities were included, of whom 56 responded to the 24-month follow-up; at that point, they were divided into patients with complaints (C, n = 36) and patients without complaints (NC, n = 20). Correlations among the pain intensity, disability and psychosocial factors were analysed preoperatively, 3 and 24 months after discectomy, and regression analyses of psychosocial factors on the outcome at 24 months were performed.
Psychosocial variables were weakly correlated with the pain intensity and disability preoperatively. High expectations on the return to work were predictive of both pain intensity (β = 8.0, p = 0.03) and disability (β = 9.1, p < 0.001) at 24 months. Associations between psychosocial variables and outcome variables were strengthened at the 3-month follow-up in the C group, and this association remained 24 months after surgery. Fear of movement was most strongly correlated with leg pain intensity (r s 0.64, p < 0.001) and the ability to decrease pain was the most correlated with disability (r s 0.78, p < 0.001).
Having high expectations on the return to work after surgery was the strongest predictor for a favourable outcome. Therefore, low preoperative expectations on return to work convey an important prognostic signal.
KeywordsLumbar discectomy Psychosocial factors Patients’ expectations Coping strategies Pain disability
Conflict of interest
- 1.Lurie JD, Tosteson AN, Deyo RA, Tosteson T, Weinstein J, Mirza SK (2014) Indications for spine surgery: validation of an administrative coding algorithm to classify degenerative diagnoses. Spine (Phila Pa 1976)Google Scholar
- 2.Weinstein JN, Lurie JD, Tosteson TD, Skinner JS, Hanscom B, Tosteson AN, Herkowitz H, Fischgrund J, Cammisa FP, Albert T, Deyo RA (2006) Surgical vs nonoperative treatment for lumbar disk herniation: the Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial (SPORT) observational cohort. JAMA 296(20):2451–2459PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 6.Johansson AC, Cornefjord M, Bergkvist L, Ohrvik J, Linton SJ (2007) Psychosocial stress factors among patients with lumbar disc herniation, scheduled for disc surgery in comparison with patients scheduled for arthroscopic knee surgery. Eur Spine J 16(7):961–970PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 13.Linton SJ, Hallden K (1997) Risk factors and the natural course of acute and recurrent musculoskeletal pain: developing a screening instrument. IASP Press 527–536Google Scholar
- 19.Miller RP, Kori SH,Todd DD (1991) The Tampa Scale. Unpublished report. Tampa, FLGoogle Scholar