European Spine Journal

, Volume 24, Issue 5, pp 1031–1042 | Cite as

Spinal fusion using adipose stem cells seeded on a radiolucent cage filler: a feasibility study of a single surgical procedure in goats

  • Robert J. Kroeze
  • Theo H. Smit
  • Pieter P. Vergroesen
  • Ruud A. Bank
  • Reinout Stoop
  • Bert van Rietbergen
  • Barend J. van Royen
  • Marco N. Helder
Original Article



To assess the feasibility of a one-step surgical concept, employing adipose stem cells (ASCs) and a novel degradable radiolucent cage filler (poly-L-lactide-co-caprolactone; PLCL), within polyetheretherketone cages in a stand-alone caprine spinal fusion model.


A double-level fusion study was performed in 36 goats. Four cage filler groups were defined: (i) acellular PLCL, (ii) PLCL + SVF (freshly harvested stromal vascular fraction highly enriched in ASCs); (iii) PLCL + ASCs (cultured to homogeneity); and (iv) autologous iliac crest bone graft (ABG). Fusion was assessed after 3 and 6 months by radiography, micro-CT, biomechanics, and biochemical analysis of tissue formed inside the cage after 6 months.


No adverse effects were observed in all groups. After 3 months, similar and low fusion rates were found. Segmental stability did not differ between groups in all tested directions. Micro-CT imaging revealed significantly higher amounts of mineralized tissue in the ABG group compared to all others. After 6 months, interbody fusion rates were: PLCL 53 %, SVF 30 %, ASC 43 % and ABG 63 %. A trend towards higher mineralized tissue content was found for the ABG group. Biochemical and biomechanical analyses revealed equal maturity of collagen cross-links and similar segmental stability between all groups.


This study demonstrates the technical feasibility and safety of the one-step surgical procedure for spinal fusion for the first time. The radiolucent PLCL scaffold allowed in vivo monitoring of bone formation using plain radiography. Addition of stem cells to the PLCL scaffolds did not result in adverse effects, but did not enhance the rate and number of interbody fusions under the current conditions. A trend towards superior results with ABG was found. Further research is warranted to optimize the spinal fusion model for proper evaluation of both PLCL and stem cell therapy.


Spinal fusion Animal model Degradable polymers Stem cells Tissue engineering 



The authors gratefully acknowledge Ger Vink, Klaas-Walter Meyer and Paul Sinnige from the University Animal Laboratory, for their invaluable help with the animal experiments and aftercare. The authors further like to acknowledge Dr. P. Gingras and Mr. P. Mulrooney for their help in designing and manufacturing the PLCL sheets used in this study. Finally, we would like to acknowledge Jessica Snabel from the Division of Biosciences, TNO Quality of Life, Leiden. The work of RJK has been supported by the Dutch Program for Tissue Engineering (Grant No. BGT 6734).

Conflict of interest

Bert van Rietbergen is a consultant for Scanco Medical AG.


  1. 1.
    Bank RA, Jansen EJ, Beekman B, te Koppele JM (1996) Amino acid analysis by reverse-phase high-performance liquid chromatography: improved derivatization and detection conditions with 9-fluorenylmethyl chloroformate. Anal Biochem 240:167–176CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Burkus JK, Foley K, Haid RW, LeHuec JC (2001) Surgical Interbody Research Group–radiographic assessment of interbody fusion devices: fusion criteria for anterior lumbar interbody surgery. Neurosurg Focus 10:E11PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Busscher I, van Dieen JH, Kingma I et al (2009) Biomechanical characteristics of different regions of the human spine: an in vitro study on multilevel spinal segments. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 34:2858–2864CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Helder MN, Knippenberg M, Klein-Nulend J, Wuisman PI (2007) Stem cells from adipose tissue allow challenging new concepts for regenerative medicine. Tissue Eng 13:1799–1808CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hoogendoorn RJ, Lu ZF, Kroeze RJ et al (2008) Adipose stem cells for intervertebral disc regeneration: current status and concepts for the future. J Cell Mol Med 12:2205–2216CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Jurgens WJ, Kroeze RJ, Bank RA, Ritt MJ, Helder MN (2011) Rapid attachment of adipose stromal cells on resorbable polymeric scaffolds facilitates the one-step surgical procedure for cartilage and bone tissue engineering purposes. J Orthop Res 29:853–860CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Knippenberg M, Helder MN, Zandieh DB, Wuisman PI, Klein-Nulend J (2006) Osteogenesis versus chondrogenesis by BMP-2 and BMP-7 in adipose stem cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 342:902–908CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Krijnen MR, Mensch D, van Dieen JH, Wuisman PI, Smit TH (2006) Primary spinal segment stability with a stand-alone cage: in vitro evaluation of a successful goat model. Acta Orthop 77:454–461CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Krijnen MR, Mullender MG, Smit TH, Everts V, Wuisman PI (2006) Radiographic, histologic, and chemical evaluation of bioresorbable 70/30 poly-L-lactide-CO-D, L-lactide interbody fusion cages in a goat model. Spine 31:1559–1567CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kroeze RJ, Helder MN, Roos WH et al (2010) The effect of ethylene oxide, glow discharge and electron beam on the surface characteristics of poly(L-lactide-co-caprolactone) and the corresponding cellular response of adipose stem cells. Acta Biomater 6:2060–2065CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kroeze RJ, van der Veen AJ, Van Royen BJ et al (2013) Relation between radiological assessment and biomechanical stability of lumbar interbody fusion in a large animal model. Eur Spine J 22:2731–2739CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Liu X, Ma PX (2004) Polymeric scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Ann Biomed Eng 32:477–486CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Parson A (2006) The long journey from stem cells to medical product. Cell 125:9–11CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Sasso RC, LeHuec JC, Shaffrey C (2005) Iliac crest bone graft donor site pain after anterior lumbar interbody fusion: a prospective patient satisfaction outcome assessment. J Spinal Disord Tech 18(Suppl):S77–S81CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Silber JS, Anderson DG, Daffner SD et al (2003) Donor site morbidity after anterior iliac crest bone harvest for single-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 28:134–139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Van Dijk M, Smit TH, Arnoe MF, Burger EH, Wuisman PI (2003) The use of poly-L-lactic acid in lumbar interbody cages: design and biomechanical evaluation in vitro. Eur Spine J 12:34–40PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Van Dijk M, Smit TH, Burger EH, Wuisman PI (2002) Bioabsorbable poly-L-lactic acid cages for lumbar interbody fusion: three-year follow-up radiographic, histologic, and histomorphometric analysis in goats. Spine 27:2706–2714CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Van Dijk M, Smit TH, Sugihara S, Burger EH, Wuisman PI (2002) The effect of cage stiffness on the rate of lumbar interbody fusion: an in vivo model using poly(l-lactic Acid) and titanium cages. Spine 27:682–688CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Van Dijk M, van Diest PJ, Smit TH et al (2005) Four-year follow-up of poly-L-lactic Acid cages for lumbar interbody fusion in goats. J Long Term Eff Med Implants 15:125–138CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Vergroesen PP, Kroeze RJ, Helder MN, Smit TH (2011) The use of poly(L-lactide-co-caprolactone) as a scaffold for adipose stem cells in bone tissue engineering: application in a spinal fusion model. Macromol Biosci 11:722–730CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Zuk PA (2001) Stem cell research has only just begun. Science 293:211–212PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Zuk PA, Zhu M, Ashjian P et al (2002) Human adipose tissue is a source of multipotent stem cells. Mol Biol Cell 13:4279–4295CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Zuk PA, Zhu M, Mizuno H et al (2001) Multilineage cells from human adipose tissue: implications for cell-based therapies. Tissue Eng 7:211–228CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Robert J. Kroeze
    • 1
    • 2
    • 6
  • Theo H. Smit
    • 1
    • 6
  • Pieter P. Vergroesen
    • 1
    • 6
  • Ruud A. Bank
    • 3
    • 6
  • Reinout Stoop
    • 4
  • Bert van Rietbergen
    • 5
  • Barend J. van Royen
    • 1
    • 6
  • Marco N. Helder
    • 1
    • 6
  1. 1.Department of Orthopaedic SurgeryVU University Medical CenterAmsterdamThe Netherlands
  2. 2.Department of Oral Cell Biology, Academic Centre for Dentistry Amsterdam (ACTA)Universiteit van Amsterdam and Vrije UniversiteitAmsterdamThe Netherlands
  3. 3.Department of Medical BiologyUniversity Medical Center GroningenGroningenThe Netherlands
  4. 4.Department of Tissue repair, Division of BiosciencesTNO Quality of LifeLeidenThe Netherlands
  5. 5.Department of Biomedical engineeringEindhoven University of TechnologyEindhovenThe Netherlands
  6. 6.MOVE/Skeletal Tissue Engineering Group Amsterdam (STEGA)AmsterdamThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations