Advertisement

European Spine Journal

, Volume 24, Supplement 1, pp 72–82 | Cite as

Sacral and pelvic osteotomies for correction of spinal deformities

  • Arnaud Bodin
  • Pierre RoussoulyEmail author
Original Article

Abstract

Introduction

Restoring a physiological sagittal spine balance is one of the main goals in spine surgery. Several technics have been described previously, as pedicle subtraction osteotomy. In more complicated cases involving spino-pelvic disorders, three authors proposed sacral osteotomy to restore sagittal balance of the spine. The authors describe the use of pelvic osteotomies for the correction of lumbo-sacral kyphosis, for decreasing pelvic incidence and for achieving sagittal balance correction in cases of lumbo-sacral sagittal deformity as an alternative of pedicle subtraction osteotomies (PSO).

Materials and methods

We simulate four types of pelvic osteotomies previously described for hip pathology (Salter, modified Salter, Chiari and posterior sacral osteotomy) on drawing software, and calculate during these osteotomies the variation of pelvic incidence (PI). Then, we compare the behaviour in this simulation to a cadaveric model where we perform the same four pelvic osteotomies. Via X-rays made the study, we calculate also the PI. Then, we analyse 11 patients who underwent pelvic osteotomies for sagittal unbalance, analysing operative and clinical data.

Results

We find a mathematical law governing the PI during anterior opening and posterior closing osteotomies (respectively Salter and sacral osteotomy):
$$ {\text{PI end}} = {\text{PI initial}} {-} a \times {\text{osteotomy angle}}.$$
These laws are confirmed in the cadaveric model which retrieves the same behaviour. In the clinical series, Salter osteotomy is easy and efficient on sagittal rebalancing; sacral osteotomy is more powerful.

Discussion

The Salter osteotomy is efficient for restoring sagittal balance of the spine. The posterior sacral osteotomy is more powerful but technically demanding. The indications of such special osteotomies are fixed lumbo-sacral kyphosis, especially high-grade spondylolisthesis, previously operated or not.

Conclusion

A study of a more substantial series would be considered.

Keywords

Pelvic osteotomy Sacral osteotomy Sagittal spine balance Spinal deformity Pelvic incidence High-grade spondylolisthesis 

Notes

Conflict of interest

None.

References

  1. 1.
    Barrey C, Jund J, Noseda O, Roussouly P (2007) Sagittal balance of the pelvis-spine complex and lumbar degenerative diseases. A comparative study about 85 cases. Eur spine J 16:1459–1467PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Berthonnaud E, Dimnet J, Roussouly P, Labelle H (2005) Analysis of the sagittal balance of the spine and pelvis using shape and orientation parameters. J Spinal Disord Tech 18:40–47PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Birnbaum K, Pastor A, Prescher A, Heller KD (2000) Complications of Chiari and Salter osteotomies. Surg Radiol Anat 22:225–233PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Blondel B, Jouve JL, Panuel M, Adalian P, Solari C, Tropiano P, Bollini G (2008) Etude de la fiabilité des mesures de l’incidence pelvienne dans l’analyse de l’équilibre sagittal du bassin. Rev Chir Orthop 94:321–326PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Boulay C, Tardieu C, Hecquet J, Benaim C, Mouilleseaux B, Marty C, Prat-Pradal D, Legaye J, Duval-Beaupère G, Pelissier J (2006) Sagittal alignment of spine and pelvis regulated by pelvic incidence. Eur Spine J 15:415–422PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Duval-Beaupère G, Legaye J (2004) Composante sagittale de la statique rachidienne. Rev Rhum 71:105–119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gangnet N, Dumas R, Pomero V, Mitulescu A, Skalli W, Vital JM (2006) 3D spinal and pelvic alignment in an asymptomatic population. Spine 31:E507–E512PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Gangnet N, Pomero V, Dumas R, Skalli W, Vital JM (2003) Variability of the spine and pelvis location with respect to the gravity line. Surg Radiol Anat 25:424–433PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Guigui P, Levassor N, Rillardon L, Wodecki P, Cardinne L (2003) Valeurs physiologiques des paramètres pelviens et rachidiens de l’équilibre sagittal du rachis. Rev chir Orthop 89:496–506PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hovorka I, Rousseau P, Amoretti N, Challali M, Julia M, Carles M, Daideri G, Bronsard N, Boileau P (2008) Extension reserve of the hip in relation with spine in Spine Concepts 2007 Sauramps medical. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 94(8):771–776PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hovorka I, Rousseau P, Bronsard N, Challali M, Julia M, Carles M, Amoretti N, Boileau P (2008) Mesure de la reserve d’extension de la hanche en relation avec le rachis. Rev Chir Orthop 94:771–776PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Itoi E (1991) Roentgenographic analysis of posture in spinal ostoporotics. Spine 6:750–756CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Jackson RP, Hales C (2000) Congruent spinopelvic alignment on standing lateral radiographs of adult volunteers. Spine 25:2808–2815PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Jackson RP (1998) Compensatory spinopelvic balance over the hip axis and better reliability in measuring lordosis to the pelvic radius on standing lateral radiographs of adult volunteers and patients. Spine 23:1750–1767PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kobayashi T, Atsuta Y, Matsuno T, Takeda N (2009) A longitudinal study of congruent sagittal spinal alignement in an adult cohort. Spine 29:671–676CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kuntz C, Levin LS, Ondra SL, Shaffrey CI, Morgan CJ (2007) Neutral upright sagittal spinal alignment from the occiput to the pelvis in asymptomatic adults. J Neurosurg Spine 6:104–112PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Lafage V, Schwab F, Skalli W, Hawkinson N, Gagey PM, Ondra S, Farcy JP (2008) Standing balance and sagittal plane spinal deformity. Spine 33:1572–1578PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Lafage V, Schwab F, Patel A, Hawkinson N, Farcy JP (2008) T1 tilt may outperform the plum-line in clinical correlation in meeting of international society for the study of lumbar spine meeting abstracts:115Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Lafage V, Schwab F, Rubio F, Farcy JP (2008) Impact of sagittal plane spinal deformity on the spino-pelvic relationship and gravity line in adults. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2008(90):supp III 433Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Lazennec JY, Charlot N, Gorin M, Roger B, Arafati N, Bissery A, Saillant G (2004) Hip-spine relationship. Surg Radiol Anat 26:136–144PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Lee CS, Lee CK, Kim YT, Hong YM, Yoo JH (2001) Dynamic sagittal imbalance of the spine in degenerative flat back. Spine 26:2029–2035PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Legaye J, Duval-Beaupère G, Hecquet J, Marty C (1998) Pelvic incidence. Eur Spine J 7:99–103PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Levassor N, Rillardon L, Deburge A, Guigui P (2003) Les paramètres pelviens et rachidiens de l’équilibre sagittal du rachis. Rev Chir Orthop;89:21 supplémentGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Mangione P, Sénégas J (1997) L’équilibre rachidien dans le plan sagittal. Rev Chir Orthop 83:22–32Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Morvan G, Wybier M, Mathieu P, Vuillemin V, Guerini H (2008) Clichés simples du rachis: statique et relations entre rachis et bassin. J Radiol 89:654–666PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Roussouly P, Transfeldt E, Schwender J, Berthonnaud E, Dimnet J (2002) Sagittal morphology and equilibrium of pelvis and spine in normals. Spine J 2:47S–128SCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Roussouly P, Gollogly S, Noseda O, Berthonnaud E, Dimnet J (2006) The vertical projection of the sum of the ground reactive forces of a standing patient is not the same as the C7 plumb-line. Spine 31:E320–E325PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Roussouly P, Berthonnaud E, Dimnet J (2003) Analyse géométrique et mécanique de la lordose lombaire dans une population de 160 adultes asymptomatiques. Rev Chir Orthop 89:632–639PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Roussouly P, Gollogly S, Berthonnaud E, Dimnet J (2005) Classification of the normal variation of the sagittal alignment of the human lumbar spine and pelvis in the standing position. Spine 30:346–353PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Schwab F, Lafage V, Boyce R, Skalli W, Farcy JP (2006) Gravity line analysis in adult volunteers. Spine 31:E959–E967PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Tassin JL (2004) Equilibre sagittal du rachis Conférence d’enseignement de la SOFCOTGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Vialle R, Levassor N, Rillardon L, Templier A, Skalli W, Guigui P (2005) Radiographic analysis of the sagittal alignment and balance of the spine in asymptomatic subjects JBJS 87A(2):260–267Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Vital JM, Obeid I (2008) Statique rachidienne dans le plan sagittal Mémoire pour la société d'imagerie musculo squelettiqueGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Vital JM, Gille O, Gangnet N (2004) Equilibre sagittal et applications cliniques. Rev Rhum 71:120–128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Jackson RP, Kanemura T, Kawakami N, Hales C (2000) Lumbopelvic lordosis and pelvic balance on repeated standing lateral radiographs of adult volunteers and untreated patients with constant low back pain. Spine 25:575–586PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Molinari RW (2005) Sagittal plane decompensation. Curr Opin Orthop 16:148–151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Bridwell KH (2006) Decision making regarding Smith Petersen vs. pedicle subtraction osteotomy vs. vertebral column resection for spin al deformity. Spine 31:S171–S178PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Bridwell KH, Lenke LG, Lewis SJ (2001) Treatment of spinal stenosis and fixed sagittal imbalance. Clin Orthop Rel Res 384:35–44Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Chang KW, Cheng CW, Chen HC, Chang KI, Chen TS (2008) Closing opening wedge osteotomy for the treatment of sagittal imbalance. Spine 33:1470–1477 Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Chen IH, Chien JT, Yu TC (2001) Transpedicular wedge osteotomy for correction of thoracolumbar kyphosis in ankylosing spondylitis. Spine 26:E354–E360PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Gill JB, Lewin A, Burd T, Longley M (2008) Corrective osteotomies in spine surgery. JBJS Am 90:2509–2520Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Mummaneni PV, Dhall SS, Ondra SL, Mummaneni VP, Berven S (2008) Pedicle subtraction osteotomy. Neurosurg 63S:171–176Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Ondra SL, Marzouk S, Koski T, Silva F, Salehi S (2006) Mathematical calculation of pedicule subtraction osteotomy size to allow precision correction of fixed sagittal deformity. Spine 31:E973–E979PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Rose PS, Bridwell KH, Lenke LG, Cronen GA, Mulconrey DS, Buchowski JB, Kim YJ (2009) Role of pelvic incidence, thoracic kyphosis and patient factors on sagittal plane correction following pedicule subtraction osteotomy. Spine 34:785–791 Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Roussouly P (2006) Correction des déséquilibres sagittaux et frontaux du rachis par ostéotomie rachidienne ou du bassin Conférence d’enseignement de la SOFCOT conférences d'enseignement, vol 91, pp 24–42Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Sansur CA, Fu KMG, Oskouian RJ, Jagannathan J, Kuntz C, Shaffrey CJ (2008) Surgical management of global spinal deformity in ankylosing spondylitis. Neurosurg Focus 24:E8 Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Van Royen BJ, De Gast A, Smit TH (2000) Deformity planning for sagittal plane corrective osteotomies of the spine in ankylosing spondylitis. Eur Spine J 9:492–498PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Wang MY, Berven SH (2007) Lumbar pedicule subtraction osteotomy. Neurosurg 60:140–146Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Yang BP, Yang CW, Ondra SL (2007) A novel mathematical model of the sagittal spine. Spine 32:466–470PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Yang BP, Ondra SL (2006) A method for calculating the exact angle required during pedicule subtraction osteotomy for fixed sagittal deformity. Neurosurg 59S:458–463Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Carlioz H (2000) Les ostéotomies du bassin chez l’enfant et l’adolescent. Acta Orthop Belgica 66:321–328Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Carlioz H, Madi F (2004) Les ostéotomies pelviennes in Conférences d’enseignement de la SOFCOT conférences d'enseignement, vol 87, pp 10–23Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Macnicol MF, Al Rawashdeh H, Auld J (2000) Technical aspects of the Salter innominate osteotomy. Cur Orthop 14:209–214Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    Macnicol MF (2007) The Salter innominate osteotomy. Cur Orthop 21:85–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Patil S, Sherlock DA (2007) The Chiari medial displacement osteotomy. Cur Orthop 21:109–114Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    Pfeifer R, Hurschler C, Ostermeier S, Windhagen H, Pressel T (2008) In vitro investigation of biomechanical changes of the hip after Slater pelvic osteotomy. Clin Biomec 23:299–304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Rab GT (1978) Biomechanical aspects of Salter osteotomy. Clin Orthop Rel Res 132:82–87Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    Sales de Gauzy J (1997) Indications des ostéotomies pelviennes chez l’enfant Conférences d’enseignement de la SOFCOT 62:71–90Google Scholar
  59. 59.
    Salter RB (1961) The classic innominate osteotomy in the treatment of congenital dislocation and subluxation of the hip. JBJS Brit 43B:518–531Google Scholar
  60. 60.
    Vaz G, Bejui-Hugues T (2003) Ostéotomie pelvienne dans le traitement de la dysplasie acétabulaire in Journées Lyonnaises de Chirurgie de la Hanche. Livre du congrès, 73–82Google Scholar
  61. 61.
    Gérard Y, Segal P, Jacob M (1971) L’ostéotomie pelvienne préférée à l’ostéotomie rachidienne pour le traitement des grandes cyphoses de la spondylarthrite ankylosante. Rev Rhum 38:221–229PubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Wilson PD, Levine DB (1969) Compensatory pelvic osteotomy for ankylosing spondylitis. JBJS Am 51:142–148Google Scholar
  63. 63.
    Hsieh PC, Ondra S, Wienecke RJ, O’Shaughnessy BA, Koski TR (2007) A novel approach to sagittal balance restoration following iatrogenic sacral fracture and resulting sacral kyphotic deformity. J Neurosurg Spine 6:368–372 Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Clinique MutualisteGrenobleFrance
  2. 2.CX Rouge Française-CMCR des MassuesLyonFrance

Personalised recommendations